| 研究生: |
許治平 Hsu, Chih-Ping |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
結合模擬及啟發式解法求解半導體廠機台組態決策 The tool portfolio analysis for semiconductor fab using simulation-based heuristics |
| 指導教授: |
楊大和
Yang, Ta-ho |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
電機資訊學院 - 製造工程研究所 Institute of Manufacturing Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2005 |
| 畢業學年度: | 93 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 74 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 順序偏好法 、瓶頸機台 、效用函數 、機台組態規劃 、模擬 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | utility function, simulation, TOPSIS, bottleneck machine, tool portfolio planning |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:78 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
半導體製造業的製造系統特色包括耗費設備成本大、製程步驟數多與機器設備複雜,而依據製程設備、技術與產品需求,決定工廠內機台類別與數量的產能規劃程序在此稱為機台組態規劃。半導體廠中通常有上百種不同類型的機台,總機台數更可達到數百台,再加上製程複雜等特色,因此易發生過多的設備投資將造成產能閒置及資金積壓,亦無益於產出量的提升;過少設備投資則會使產出不如預期,而造成收益上的損失及影響生產績效,一般研究大多探討在一個固定的生產環境中,管理方式與系統參數對生產績效的影響,甚少研究專注於機台種類與數量的配置。因此,本研究以模擬為基礎的啟發式方法來調整機台組態,期望得到符合實際系統需求及具較適效益的機台組態決策。
本研究主要目的在考慮單一產品下,根據機台組態變動方式與瓶頸指標選擇搭配下,調整出數個不同的機台組態解,並以投資成本、效用函數及改變投料量方式來分析比較數種機台組態解的優劣,衡量的產出績效分別為週期時間、平均在製品量、等候時間、產出量及個別機台的利用率。
The characters of the manufacturing system in semiconductor manufacturing are high-cost of equipment, plenty of manufacturing procedure, and complex of tool portfolio. Tool portfolio planning is a capacity planning with making decision of the category and quantity of machines in a wafer fab according to the technology and demand of product. There are usually more than one hundred different kinds of machines in a fab. According to hundreds of machines and complex of manufacturing procedure, the over-investing for tools under a fab where releasing amount of wafer is fixed will raise let machines idle, sit on capital and not be helpful to the throughput. On the other hand, the lack of investment for equipments will result in the insufficient throughput, the lost of benefit and terrible performance of manufacturing. The last researches generally probe into the case of the performance of manufacturing caused by management and factors of system. Less research does that case focus on the decision of tool portfolio. Therefore this thesis is to develop a simulation-based heuristics to adjust the tool portfolio in order to make the most beneficial decision about tool portfolio and manufacture sufficient throughput.
The goal of this research is to find out many different tool portfolios by arrangement in pairs of the adjustment of tool portfolio and the choices of bottleneck according single product in fab. These tool portfolios would be analyzed and compared with some performance index, including investment, utility function and inference by changing input of material. These performance indices are cycle time, average work in process, queuing delay, throughput and the utilization of individual tools.
參考文獻
莊達人,(民87),VLSI製造技術,高立圖書有限公司
黃承龍、張盛鴻、李榮貴,(民,90),瓶頸漂移分析與對策之研究,中國工業工程期刊, Vol. 18, No. 4,pp.73-81.
楊君威,(民90),利用離散式建模擬方法求解即時性產能規劃問題-以半導體封裝廠封膠區為例,國立成功大學製造工程研究所,碩士論文
葛廣漢,(民,92),半導體設備產業現況與展望,經濟部精密機械工業發展推動小組(Download from: http://www.tami.org.tw/market/20030115.htm)
羅文雄、蔡榮輝,(民92),半導體製造技術,滄海書局
Arena User’s Guide, Version 7.0, 2003, Rockwell Software Inc., West Allis, WI USA.
Bonal, J., Ortega, C., Rios, L., Aparicio, S., Fernandez, M., Rosendo, M., Alejandro, S. M., 1996, Overall Fab Efficiency., IEEE Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, pp.49-52.
Chou W., Eveton J., 1996, Capacity Planning for Develop Wafer Fab Expansion, IEEE Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, pp.17-22
Chou Y.C., Hong L.H., 2000, A Methodology for Product Mix Planning in Semiconductor Foundry Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol.13, No.3, pp.278-285
Chou Y.C., Wu C.S., 2002, Economic analysis and optimization of tool portfolio in semiconductor manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp.447-453.
Goldratt, E. and Cox, J., 1992, The Goal- a process of ongoing improvement, North River Press, Great Barrington, MA.
Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.P., 1981, Multiple Attribute Decision Making:Method and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Iwata Y., Taji K., And Tamura, H., 2003, Multi-objective capacity planning for agile semiconductor manufacturing, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 14, No. 3, April–may, pp.244–254.
Law, A.M. and Kelton, W.D., 2000, Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 3rd edition, McGraw international, pp.518-526.
Neudroff J., 1999, Static capacity analysis using Microsoft Visual Basic, International Conference on Semiconductor Manufacturing Operational Modeling and simulation, pp.207-212
Stevenson W.J.,1999, Production/Operations Management 6/e, McGraw Hill Company.
Uribe, A.M., Cochran, J.K., and Shunk, D L., 2003, Two-stage simulation optimization for agile manufacturing capacity planning, International Journal Production Research, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp.1181–1197.
Wortman, J.C., Euwe, M.J., Taal, M. and Wiers, V.C.S., 1996, A review of capacity planning techniques within standard software packages, Production Planning & Control, 7, pp.117-128.
Yoon, K.P. and Hwang, C.L., 1995,Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction, Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA
Zeleny, M., 1982, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, New York, McGraw-Hill.