| 研究生: |
洪丞賢 Hong, Cheng-Xian |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
在策略成本之考量下製造商與零售商間之通路競爭 Channel competition between the manufacturer and the retailer under the consideration of strategic costs. |
| 指導教授: |
謝中奇
Hsieh, Chung-Chi |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系 Department of Industrial and Information Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2010 |
| 畢業學年度: | 98 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 59 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 自有品牌 、網路通路 、賽局理論 、Hotelling 模型 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Store Brand, Internet Channel, Game Theory, Hotelling Model |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:100 下載:7 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著自有品牌風潮的興起,有越來越多零售商推出自有品牌商品與製造商爭利,並同時提升競價能力。此外,隨著科技的發達與進步,消費者購買產品之途徑不再局限於實體零售通路,可以透過網路通路亦或電視購物頻道購買商品,在市場上呈現多通路之商品競爭。本研究係以單一製造商透過單一零售商販售NB(National Brand)商品之模式,雙方成員皆擁有其競爭策略,在零售商方面可以選擇是否行使自有品牌策略;在製造商方面可以選擇是否建立網路通路販售商品,本研究以賽局理論作為推論基礎,探討以下四個模型,分別是雙方皆不行使策略、僅零售商推行自有品牌策略、僅製造商行使網路通路策略與雙方皆行使策略。
本研究係以Hotelling模型建構供應鏈之市場競爭,並在第四章的參數分析探討不同情境參數對於製造商與零售商的競爭策略及獲利之影響。本研究指出零售商推行自有品牌策略必須釐清商品的市場定位,倘若已將自有品牌商品定義為該類產品別之替代品,零售商無須隨商品品質提升而提高商品價格,否則容易喪失消費者的價格青睞;製造商推行網路通路策略必須多加注意成本控制,消費者傾向購買網路通路商品之主要因素為網路價格普遍較零售價格低,倘若高成本反映至網路通路之商品售價,容易導致製造商喪失行使網路通路策略之優勢。
With the rise of Store Brand trend, more and more retailers introduce Store Brand products to compete with the manufacturer for profit. This strategy not only increases retailers' profits, but also promotes retailers' tendering abilities. Furthermore, the consumption is no longer limited in the retail channel due to the developed and advanced technology. People can purchase products through TV shopping or on-line shopping. Therefore, the competition in products of multiple selling channels occurs in the market. This research develops the model in which a single manufacturer sells National Brand products through a single retailer. Both of the bilateral members have their own competitive strategies. From the point of view of the retailer, he can decide whether to develop Store Brand products or not. However, for the manufacturer, he can decide if he develops the internet channel to sell National Brand products. Based on the game theory, this research discusses four models respectively: Both of two sides do not adopt strategies; only the retailer adopts the store brand strategy; only the manufacturer adopts the internet channel strategy; and both sides adopt strategies.
This research is based on Hotelling model to build the market competition of supplying chains. We discuss the different situational parameters regarding the manufacturer's and the retailer's competition strategies and profits. This research points out that the retailer adopts the store brand strategy must clearly define products' positions in the market. If the retailer has defined the Store Brand products as National Brand products' substitutes, the retailer does not need to raise the products' price along with the products' quality, or the retailer is easy to lose consumers' favor. The manufacturer adopting the internet channel strategy must pay attention to the control of cost. Consumers prefer to purchase the products through the internet channel because the prices are lower than those in the retail channel. If the high cost reflects upon the price of products in the internet channel, it easily makes the manufacturer lose the superiority of adopting the internet channel strategy.
Ailawadi, K. L., Gedenk, K. and Neslin, S. Understanding competition between
retailers and manufacturers: An integrated analysis of store brand and
national brand deal usage. Tuck Business School Working Paper, 2003.
Balasubramanian, S. Mail versus mall: A strategic analysis of competition
between direct marketers and conventional retailers. Marketing Science,
17(3), 181-195, 1998.
Batra, R. and Sinha, I. Consumer-level factors moderating the success of
private label brands. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 175-191, 2000.
Cattani, K., Gilland, W., Heese, H. S. and Swaminathan, J. Boiling frogs: Pric-
ing strategies for a manufacturer adding a direct channel that competes
with the traditional channel. Production and Operations Management,
15(1), 40-56, 2006.
C. d'Aspremont, J.-F. T., J. Jaskold Gabszewicz. On hotelling's "stability in
competition". Econometrica, 47(5), 1145-1150, 1979.
Chen, K. Y., Kaya, M. and Ozer, O. Dual sales channel management with ser-
vice competition. Submitted to the Journal of Manufacturing and Service
Operations Management, 10(4), 654-675, 2008.
Chiang, W. Y. K., Chhajed, D. and Hess, J. D. Direct-marketing, indirect
pro¯ts: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Man-
agement Science, 49(1), 1-20, 2003.
Corstjens, M. and Lal, R. Building store loyalty through store brands. Journal
of Marketing Research, 37(3), 281-291, 2000.
Dhar, S. K. and Hoch, S. J. Why store brand penetration varies by retailer.
Marketing Science, 16(3), 208-227, 1997.
Dumrongsiri, A., Fan, M., Jain, A. and Moinzadeh, K. A supply chain model
with direct and retail channels. European Journal of Operational Research,
187(3), 691-718, 2008.
Gerstner, E. and Hess, J. D. Pull promotions and channel coordination. Mar-
keting Science, 14(1), 43-60, 1995.
Geyskens, I., Gielens, K. and Dekimpe, M. G. The market valuation of internet
channel additions. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 102-119, 2002.
Groznik, A. and Heese, H. S. Supply chain interactions due to store-brand
introductions: The impact of retail competition. European Journal of
Operational Research, 203(3), 575-582, 2010.
Hendershott, T. and Zhang, J. A model of direct and intermediated sales.
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 15(2), 279-316, 2006.
Hotelling, H. Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 9(153), 41-57,
1929.
Kumar, N. and Ruan, R. On manufacturers complementing the traditional
retail channel with a direct online channel. Quantitative Marketing and
Economics, 4(3), 289-323, 2006.
Li, H., Kuo, C. and Russell, M. G. The impact of perceived channel util-
ities,shopping orientations and demographics on the consumer's online
buying behavior. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5(2),
1-20, 1999.
Liang, T. P. and Huang, J. S. An empirical study on consumer acceptance
of products in electronic markets: a transaction cost model. Decision
Support Systems, 24(1), 29-43, 1998.
Pauwels, K. and Srinivasan, S. Who bene¯ts from store brand entry? Mar-
keting Science, 23(3), 364-390, 2004.
Raju, J. S., Sethuraman, R. and Dhar, S. K. The introduction and performance
of store brands. Management Science, 41(6), 957-978, 1995.
Salop, S. C. Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell Journal of
Economics, 10(1), 141-156, 1979.
Seifert, R. W., Thonemann, U. W. and Sieke, M. A. Integrating direct and
indirect sales channels under decentralized decision-making. International
Journal of Production Economics, 103(1), 209-229, 2006.
Vandenbosch, M. B. and Weinberg, C. B. Product and price-competition in
a 2-dimensional vertical diRerentiation model. Marketing Science, 14(2),
224-249, 1995.
Wu, C. C. and Wang, C. J. A positive theory of private label: A strategic role
of private label in a duopoly national-brand market. Marketing Letters,
16(2), 143-161, 2005.
Wu, D. Z., Ray, G., Geng, X. J. and Whinston, A. Implications of reduced
search cost and free riding in e-commerce. Marketing Science, 23(2),
255-262, 2004.