| 研究生: |
寧提爾 Nitisahakul, Niti |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
文化「降解」:泰國政府「泰國」泰國化與國民黨台灣中國化的詳細比較研究 Cultural “Devolutions”: A detailed comparative study between the Thai Government’s Thaification of “Thailand” and KMT’s Sinicization of Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
蔣為文
Chiung, Wi-vun |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
文學院 - 台灣文學系 Department of Taiwanese Literature |
| 論文出版年: | 2024 |
| 畢業學年度: | 112 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 124 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 比較法 、文化 、 語言 、身分 、 蔣中正 、鑾披汶·頌堪 、台灣 、泰國 、華化 、泰國化 、泰國文化 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Comparative Study, Culture, Language, Identity, Chiang Kai-Shek, Plaek Phibunsongkhram, Taiwan, Thailand, Sinicization, Thaification, Thai |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:55 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究是針對於 1938 年到 1944 年的泰國披文頌堪政府政策和 1945 年到1975 年台灣蔣介石政府政策的文化同化和政治認同進行詳細比較研究。在這項研究中,作者發現蔣介石的政府指導方向和披文頌堪的泰國政府方向有許多共同點 。蔣介石政府將某些當地文化和台灣本地民族一部分特徵進行改變和同化,推行發展華國文化。同樣鑾披汶政府以創造和發展泰國中部文化為中心去同化其他小民族的文化風情和某些特徵,這些做法和政策後來被學者和作家稱為“泰國化”或 “Thaification”,它的整體特徵與已經廣泛使用和研究的“華化” 或 “Sinicization” 如出一轍。在此以外研究中,作者發現兩個政府的文化政策做法具體細節也十分相似,兩方都適用鎮壓和打擊手段 例如 禁止某些語言或除掉某些文化風情,目的集中在本地人民,尤其是不被官方認可和推動的小民族文化,此事效果是導致鎮壓對象群體中各種文化元素和身份開始被侵蝕和破壞。雖然一些政策的實施或執行可能有所不同,但總體影響方向卻是一致的,擴展目標文明,不被認可的文化開始慢慢消失,帶領國家文化發展成我們現在所看到的泰國和台灣現代文化。另外作者也發現,雖然兩位的政策和方向大部分一致,但其中的動機和策略有不同的地方。披文頌堪當時的目的是為了發展國家和穩固國家政府,但蔣介石的目的是為了強行擊中華民族共和國,當時台灣是殖民地和軍事行動起點。
This study is a comparative study between Chiang Kai-Shek’s regime in Taiwan from the year 1945 to 1975 and Plaek Phibunsongkhram’s 1st government in Thailand from the year 1938 to 1944 on their policies as well as their effects regarding their cultural assimilation policies. In this study, the author has found several similarities regarding Chiang Kai-shek’s regime approaches in his policies over Taiwan and Plaek Phibunsongkhram’s nationalist government’s various decisions on Thailand. While Chiang Kai-Shek was sinicizing Taiwan and erasing Taiwanese cultures and identities, Plaek’s government was also participating in the similar practises by creating and promoting central Thai identities and cultures at the expenses of other cultures and minorities, these practises and policies were later called “Thaification'' by scholars and journalists, as their general characteristics were similar to the term “Sinicization'' already widely used. During the research and studies, the author found that the similarity between Thailand’s marshal Plaek’s policies regarding the “Thaification” and Generalissimo Chiang’s “Sinicization” were strikingly similar, with both dictators employed several similar methods of suppression, such as prohibition of certain languages or expunging of certain cultural identities targeting the local population, especially the groups outside the officially endorsed or promoted cultural groups; Han Chinese for Chiang and Central Thai for Plaek, the methods of which led to the erosions and destructions of various cultural elements and identities in the groups targeted for suppression. Moreover, while some policies may be differently implemented or executed, the effects of overall directions they took didn’t only led to the rise and fall of certain cultural groups, but also the creations and existences of several cultural elements within modern Thai and Taiwanese societies we are witnessing today. Despite all the similarities, however, several differences were also found regarding the motivations and the implementations of the policies. For, while Phibunsongkhram focused on the nation-building through the utilization of the cultural assimilation policies, namely “Ratta Niyom” or Cultural Mandates, Chiang Kai-shek mainly used cultural assimilation policies as tools in order to further the cause in the reclamation of the mainland China, treating Taiwan as an occupied colony and a stepping stone for the military operation.
Anujarn, S. (2015) Pibulsongkram’s Nationalist Policy and the Opposition to the Dissemination of Christianity of French Missionaries, 1938 - 1944. Proceedings of the 5th national SMARTS conference: Asian identities 2015
Amae, Y. (2011), Pro-colonial or Postcolonial? Appropriation of Japanese Colonial Heritage in Present-day Taiwan. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 40 (1), 19-62. ISSN: 1868-4874 (online), ISSN: 1868-1026 (print)
Bao, H.P. (2019). Images of Islam in Taiwan: from Chinese Islam to Global Islam. Journal of Islam in Asia, 16(1), 137-160. International Islamic University Malaysia.
Beng, S. (2017). Taiwan’s 400 Year History. SMC Publishing INC.
Bunnag, P. (1988) The Administrative Policy of the Government towards the Thai Muslims in the Southern Provinces (1932-1973). Chulalongkorn University Press.
Chang, B. (2004). From Taiwanisation to de-sinification. China Perspectives, 56, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.438
Chang D. (2009) Two Women, Two Visions of Nationhood for Taiwan: Madame Chiang Kai-shek and Hsiu-lien Annette Lu. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 15(2), 7-32, DOI: 10.1080/12259276.2009.11666065
Chaibunkaew, M. (2014) การสร้างความเป็นไทยในความเป็นมลายูมุสลิมบนพื้นที่สามจังหวัดชายแดนภาคใต้ กรณีศึกษานโยบายผสมกลมกลืนทางวัฒนธรรมของจอมพล ป. พิบูลสงคราม พ. ศ. 2481-2500 [Creating Thai identity as a Malay Muslim in the three southern border provinces: a case study of Field Marshal P. Pibulsongkhram's cultural assimilation policy (1938-1957)] [Term Paper, Thammasart University].
Cheng F. (2021). The Evolution of “Sinicisation.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 31(2):321-342. doi:10.1017/S1356186320000681
Haas, E. (1986). What is Nationalism and Why Should We Study it?. International Organization , Summer, 1986, Vol. 40, No. 3 (Summer, 1986), 707-744.
Hantrakool, P. (2003). พัฒนาการของลัทธิชาตินิยม [The Development of Nationalism]. Journal of the Faculty of Arts, Silpakorn University, 26(1), 11-57.
Hiranto, U. (1981). สารานุกรมศัพท์ทางรัฐศาสตร์ [Thai collection political sciences]. Odeonstore: Bangkok
Hsiau, A. (2018). Narrating Taiwan out of the Chinese Empire: Rewriting Taiwan’s History from a Taiwanese Perspective in the 1970s. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 18(2), 93-126.
Hsu, C. (2014). The Construction of National Identity in Taiwan’s Media, 1896-2012. BRILL.
Huang, H. (2004). State power, prostitution and sexual order in Taiwan: towards a genealogical critique of ‘Virtuous Custom’. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 5(2), 237-262.
DOI: 10.1080/1464937042000236739
Jacobs, J. B. (2012). Democratizing Taiwan. BRILL.
Klöter, H. (2014). Language Policy in the KMT and DPP eras. China Perspectives, 6.
DOI : 10.4000/chinaperspectives.442
Lee, A. (2014). Patriotic songs in primary school textbooks in Taiwan from 1949–1987. Australian Journal of Music Education, 2, 119-28.
Lee, C; Huang, J. (2023). Making Christianity Chinese: Sinicization Outside State Narratives. China Perspectives, 133, 3-8.
Lim, M. (2020). Thaification: from ethnicity to nationality. Identity Hunter. https://identityhunters.org/2020/12/05/thaification-from-ethnicity-to-nationality/
Thepboriruk, K. H. (2019). Dear Thai Sisters: Propaganda, Fashion, and the Corporeal Nation under Phibunsongkhram. Southeast Asian Studies, 8(2), 233–258. https://repository.kulib.kyotou.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2433/244012/1/sas_8_2_233.pdf
Ma, T. (2020). Making Taiwan Chinese, 1945–60. In A. Baumler (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Revolutionary China, Routledge (202-216). New York, Routledge.
Mongkolwan, P. (2016). โสร่ง รัฐนิยม และความเป็นมาของโปสเตอร์แผ่นหนึ่ง [Sarong, Ratta Niyom, And The Origin of One Poster]. RUSAMILAE JOURNAL, 35(3), 77–86.
Numnonda, T. (1978). Pibulsongkram’s Thai Nation-Building Programme during the Japanese Military Presence, 1941-1945. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 9(2), 234–247. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20062726
Osterhammel, J. (1997). Kolonialismus: Geschichte Formen Folgen. München C H Beck.
Pang H.P. (2014). TAIWAN AND CHIANG KAI-SHEK'S FANGONG DALU, Asian Affairs, 45(1), 79-107, DOI: 10.1080/03068374.2013.871843
Pankaew, A. (2016) หลวงวิจิตรวาทการ. King Prajadhipok's Institute. http://wiki.kpi.ac.th/index.php?title=หลวงวิจิตรวาทการ
Phuongpit, N. (2002). การประกาศใช้ "รัฐนิยม" ในสมัยรัฐบาลจอมพล ป. พิบูลสงคราม (พ.ศ. 2481 - 2487) [The Announcement and implementation of “Ratta Niyom” during Phibunsongkhram’s Government (1938 - 1944)]. Journal of History, 1 (January - December).
Quang, N.M., Oishi, M. (2016). Spiralling Insurgency in the Deep South: Thailand’s Unseen Road to Ethnic Conflict Management. In: Oishi, M. (eds) Contemporary Conflicts in Southeast Asia. Asia in Transition, 3. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0042-3_4
Ruamsil P. (1978). นโยบายการพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจสมัยรัฐบาล จอมพล ป. พิบูลสงคราม ตั้งแต่ พ.ศ. 2481 ถึง พ.ศ. 2487 / ผาณิต รวมศิลป์ [Field Marshal P. Pibulsonggram's policy of economic development from 1938 to 1944] [Dissertation, Chulalongkorn University].
Ruth, R. A. (2022). Brief history of Thailand: Monarchy, War and Resilience: The Fascinating Story of the Gilded Kingdom at the Heart of Asia. Tuttle Publishing.
Seton-Watson, H. (1981). Language and national consciousness. British Academy.
Schmid, J. (2012) The Development of Christianity in Taiwan. Academia. https://www.academia.edu/35897726/The_Development_of_Christianity_in_Taiwan
Shih , C.S. (1968). Economic Development in Taiwan after the Second World War. Weltwirtschaftliches Archive, Bd. 100 (1968), 113-134
Shih, F. (2012). Taiwan's subjectivity and national narrations: towards a comparative perspective with Ireland. Taiwan in Comparative Perspective, 4, 6-33. ISSN 1752-7732
Sinlapasai, D. (2019). Sharing urban public space in Bangkok, Thailand : the in-between space: a study of the Siam area [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2020.85164
Sommer, M. (2011). Colonies - Colonisation - Colonialism: A Typological Reappraisal. Ancient West & East, 10, 183-193.
Thamsook, N. (1978). Pibulsongkram’s Thai nation-building programme during the Japanese Military Presence, 1941–1945. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 9(2), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463400009760
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 56, Page 810. 24 June B.E. 2482 (1939). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2482/D/810.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 56, Page 1010. 10 July B.E. 2482 (1939). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2482/D/1010.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 56, Page 1281. 7 August B.E. 2482 (1939). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2482/D/1281.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 56, Page 2653. 9 September B.E. 2482 (1939). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2482/D/1611.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 56, Page 2359. November 6, B.E. 2482 (1939). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2482/D/2359.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 56, Page 3434. 19 February B.E. 2482 (1940). Retrieved 4 January 2023. http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2482/D/3434.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 56, Page 2653. 10 December B.E. 2482 (1939). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2482/D/2653.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 56, Page 3641. 25 March B.E. 2482 (1940). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2482/D/3641.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 57, Page 78. 30 April B.E. 2483 (1940). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2483/A/78.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 57, Page 151. 24 June B.E. 2483 (1940). Retrieved 4 January 2023.https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2483/A/151.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 58, Page 113. 21 January B.E. 2484 (1941). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2484/A/113.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 58, Page 1132., 9 September B.E. 2484 (1941). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2484/A/1132.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 59, Page 331. 3 February B.E. 2485 (1942). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2485/A/008/331.PDF
The Royal Gazette, Vol. 59, Page 1137. June B.E. 2485 (1942). Retrieved 4 January 2023. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2485/A/008/331.PDF
Wadkean, P. (2022).Nation-building Sangha during Field Marshal Plaek
Phibunsongkhram's government in 1938-1944 A.D. Journal of Liberal Arts, 2(1). Maejo University.
Wang, S.H. (1987). Chiang Kai-Shek and the Promotion of the Chinese Cultural Renaissance Movement. Chinese Studies in History, 21(2), 66-90, DOI: 10.2753/CSH0009-4633210266
Wekke, I. S., Ashrori, M., & Hamuddin, B. (2018). Institutional transformation of Madrasa of Muslim Minority in Thailand. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v4i1.1961
Wichitwathakan, L. งานค้นคว้าเรื่องชนชาติไทย [Research On Ethnic Thai]. สร้างสรรค์บุ๊คส์, 2006.