簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊捷
Yang, Chieh
論文名稱: 基於ERP資料之雲端智慧補貨決策系統建構
Development of a Cloud-Based Intelligent Replenishment Decision System Based on ERP Data
指導教授: 楊大和
Yang, Taho
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電機資訊學院 - 製造資訊與系統研究所
Institute of Manufacturing Information and Systems
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 84
中文關鍵詞: 數位轉型資料流程自動化智慧補貨決策資訊流圖差異化補貨策略
外文關鍵詞: Digital transformation, Data process automation, Intelligent replenishment decision-making, Information stream mapping(iSM), Differentiated replenishment strategy
相關次數: 點閱:4下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在數位轉型情境下,中小企業雖多已導入ERP系統,惟補貨決策仍常因資料分散、更新延遲與缺乏標準化計算邏輯,而高度仰賴人工經驗判斷,導致決策耗時、資訊不一致,並衍生缺料與庫存偏高等問題。本研究以工業潤滑油製造企業為個案場域,依循自働生產管理環(Jidoka–JIT Cycle, JJC)理念,建構基於ERP資料之雲端智慧補貨決策系統。本系統以Google Workspace為基礎,結合Google Apps Script串接ERP匯出資料,並透過Data Studio建置視覺化報表,形成雲端資料自動化流程、標準化補貨運算及異常警示監控機制。同時,運用資訊流圖(Information Stream Mapping, iSM)量化評估系統導入前後之資訊流效率。導入後,資訊流之自動化、中心化與即時化程度皆明顯提升,採購補貨決策作業時間由4小時縮短至1小時,有效改善資訊流動與作業效率。為提升補貨策略之適配性,進一步提出同時考量使用價值、需求型態與供應限制之三維補貨分類框架,並依分類結果指派差異化補貨策略。模擬結果顯示,三維分類差異化補貨策略相較於經驗法則可降低平均庫存價值約30.4%,相較於單一標準化補貨策略亦可降低約8.2%,並在維持相對穩定服務水準之前提下,降低補貨作業負荷。綜合而言,本文提出一套具實務導入可行性於中小企業之雲端補貨決策支援流程,能有效提升資訊流效率、補貨決策一致性與存貨管理績效。

    In the context of digital transformation, many small and medium-sized enterprises have adopted ERP systems; however, replenishment decisions often remain dependent on human experience due to dispersed data, delayed updates, and the lack of standardized calculation logic. This study takes an industrial lubricant manufacturing company as the case context and develops a cloud-based intelligent replenishment decision system based on ERP data, following the concept of the Jidoka–JIT Cycle (JJC).
    The proposed system is built on Google Workspace, integrates ERP-exported data through Google Apps Script, and uses Data Studio to construct visualized reports. It establishes an automated cloud-based data process, standardized replenishment calculations, and abnormality alert mechanisms. Information Stream Mapping (iSM) is also applied to evaluate the improvement in information flow efficiency before and after implementation.
    The results show that the system improves the automation, centralization, and real-time availability of information flow. The replenishment decision-making time was reduced from four hours to one hour. In addition, the proposed three-dimensional replenishment classification framework, which considers usage value, demand pattern, and supply constraints, reduced average inventory value by approximately 30.4% compared with the experience-based rule and by approximately 8.2% compared with a single standardized replenishment strategy, while maintaining a relatively stable service level.

    目錄vi 表目錄ix 圖目錄x 1緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機1 1.2 研究目的3 1.3 研究架構4 2 文獻探討6 2.1 存貨管理與補貨策略6 2.1.1 差異化補貨策略7 2.1.2 需求型態差異與分類7 2.1.3 定期檢查補貨策略8 2.1.4 二冪週期補貨策略9 2.2 數位精實與資訊流改善9 2.2.1 精實觀點下之庫存管理改善10 2.2.2 資訊流價值圖11 2.2.3 自働生產管理環(Jidoka-JIT Cycle)與簡易智慧化13 2.3 雲端協作平台與資料自動化15 2.3.1 Google Workspace16 2.3.2 Google Apps Script17 2.3.3 Data Studio18 2.4 生成式AI於決策支援系統19 2.4.1 決策支援系統之可解釋性需求19 2.4.2 生成式AI於決策支援之定位20 2.4.3 Gemini CLI20 3 問題分析與研究方法設計21 3.1 案例公司背景與營運特性22 3.2 補貨決策流程現況分析22 3.2.1 資訊面22 3.2.2 作業面23 3.2.3 決策面23 3.3 iSM資訊流斷點辨識23 3.4 改善策略25 4 系統建構27 4.1 系統設計與架構27 4.2 資料自動運算流程28 4.2.1 Apps Script觸發器與排程設定29 4.3 雲端智慧補貨決策平台建置29 4.3.1 補貨決策判斷模組30 4.3.2 分裝與原裝採購管理模組31 4.3.3 儲位管理與異常警示模組31 4.4 存貨管理儀表板32 4.5 生成式AI即時輔助分析模組34 4.5.1 架構設計與系統串接34 4.5.2 模組功能36 4.5.3 輸出成果與實務價值37 4.6 系統導入效益分析39 5 補貨策略優化與模擬分析41 5.1 三維補貨分類框架設計41 5.1.1 使用價值構面42 5.1.2 需求型態構面43 5.1.3 供應限制構面45 5.2 差異化補貨策略設計47 5.2.1 定期檢查補貨策略架構48 5.2.2 二冪檢視週期設計(Power of Two, PoT)49 5.2.3 三維分類對應之差異化補貨策略49 5.3 模擬情境設計50 5.3.1 資料前處理51 5.3.2 模擬情境52 5.3.3 績效指標設定55 5.3.4 權重敏感度分析設計56 5.4 三維分類結果分析58 5.4.1 構面分類結果分析58 5.4.2 三維整合分類結果60 5.5 績效分析60 5.5.1 情境績效比較61 5.5.2 補貨頻率分布與實務適用性分析62 5.5.3 權重敏感度分析結果63 6 結論與未來建議66 6.1 研究結論66 6.2 管理意涵67 6.3 研究限制與未來建議67 參考文獻70

    經濟部中小及新創企業署. (2025). 2025年中小企業白皮書. https://www.sme.gov.tw/article-tw-2345-13928
    Cardós, M., & Babiloni, E. (2011). Exact and approximate calculation of the cycle service level in periodic review inventory policies. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 63–68.
    Coussement, K., Abedin, M. Z., Kraus, M., Maldonado, S., & Topuz, K. (2024). Explainable AI for enhanced decision-making. Decision Support Systems, 184, 114276.
    De Bock, K. W., Coussement, K., De Caigny, A., Słowiński, R., Baesens, B., Boute, R. N., Choi, T.-M., Delen, D., Kraus, M., & Lessmann, S. (2024). Explainable AI for operational research: A defining framework, methods, applications, and a research agenda. European Journal of Operational Research, 317(2), 249–272.
    Google. (2026a). Data Studio. Retrieved May 2, 2026 from https://cloud.google.com/data-studio
    Google. (2026b). Google Workspace. Retrieved May 2, 2026 from https://workspace.google.com/resources/
    Google Cloud. (2026). Gemini CLI. Retrieved May 2, 2026 from https://docs.cloud.google.com/gemini/docs/codeassist/gemini-cli
    Google Developers. (2025). Hands-on with Gemini CLI. Retrieved April 8, 2026 from https://codelabs.developers.google.com/gemini-cli-hands-on
    Google for Developers. (2026, April 20). Google Apps Script Overview. Retrieved May 2, 2026 from https://developers.google.com/apps-script/overview
    Gupta, P., Seetharaman, A., & Raj, J. R. (2013). The usage and adoption of cloud computing by small and medium businesses. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 861–874.
    Haddud, A., DeSouza, A., Khare, A., & Lee, H. (2017). Examining potential benefits and challenges associated with the Internet of Things integration in supply chains. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(8), 1055–1085.
    Hines, P., & Rich, N. (1997). The seven value stream mapping tools. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(1), 46–64.
    Ivanov, D. (2022). Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Operations Research, 319(1), 1411–1431.
    Kobeissi, M., Assy, N., Gaaloul, W., Defude, B., Benatallah, B., & Haidar, B. (2023). Natural language querying of process execution data. Information Systems, 116, 102227.
    Koumanakos, D. P. (2008). The effect of inventory management on firm performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(5), 355–369.
    Lolli, F., Ishizaka, A., Gamberini, R., & Rimini, B. (2017). A multicriteria framework for inventory classification and control with application to intermittent demand. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 24(5-6), 275–285.
    Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing—The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 176–189.
    Maxwell, W. L., & Muckstadt, J. A. (1985). Establishing consistent and realistic reorder intervals in production-distribution systems. Operations Research, 33(6), 1316–1341.
    Model Context Protocol. (2025). Model Context Protocol Specification. Model Context Protocol. https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-11-25
    Petropoulos, F., Makridakis, S., Assimakopoulos, V., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2014). ‘Horses for Courses’ in demand forecasting. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(1), 152–163.
    Ramanathan, R. (2006). ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization. Computers & Operations Research, 33(3), 695–700.
    Roh, P., Kunz, A., & Wegener, K. (2019). Information stream mapping: Mapping, analysing and improving the efficiency of information streams in manufacturing value streams. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 25, 1–13.
    Sugimori, Y., Kusunoki, K., Cho, F., & Uchikawa, S. (1977). Toyota production system and kanban system materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system. The International Journal of Production Research, 15(6), 553–564.
    Syntetos, A. A., Boylan, J. E., & Croston, J. D. (2005). On the categorization of demand patterns. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(5), 495–503.
    Tajbakhsh, M. M. (2010). On the distribution free continuous-review inventory model with a service level constraint. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59(4), 1022–1024.
    Theodorou, E., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2023). Optimizing inventory control through a data-driven and model-independent framework. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 12, 100103.
    Tokar, T. (2010). Behavioural research in logistics and supply chain management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(1), 89–103.
    Torabi, S. A., Hatefi, S. M., & Pay, B. S. (2012). ABC inventory classification in the presence of both quantitative and qualitative criteria. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63(2), 530–537.
    van Donselaar, K., Broekmeulen, R., & de Kok, T. (2021). Heuristics for setting reorder levels in periodic review inventory systems with an aggregate service constraint. International Journal of Production Economics, 237, 108137.
    Wang, L., & Chen, H. (2022). Optimization of a stochastic joint replenishment inventory system with service level constraints. Computers & Operations Research, 148, 106001.
    Yang, T., & Fujimoto, T. (2026). Jidoka just-in-time cycle – from genba kaizen to the introduction of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2026.2656950
    Yarbrough, A. C., Harris, G. A., & Purdy, G. T. (2022). Improving the flow of data and information in manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters, 32, 1–4.
    Yigitbasioglu, O. M., & Velcu, O. (2012). A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(1), 41–59.

    QR CODE