| 研究生: |
鄭臣復 Jeng, Chen-Fu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
考量不同顧客特性下之製造商與第三方業者動態定價策略 Dynamic pricing strategies of the manufacturer and the third-party under different customer characteristics |
| 指導教授: |
謝中奇
Hsieh, Chung-Chi |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系 Department of Industrial and Information Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 99 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 耐用性商品 、新產品與二手品 、定價策略 、顧客特性 、價格承諾 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Durable product, New product and used product, Pricing strategy, Price commitment, Customer characteristics |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:94 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著二級市場的蓬勃發展,製造商在提出新產品時,必須思考到未來會有二手品與其競爭的可能性,以及如何吸引顧客進行購買以及重複購買之行為,進而影響新產品定價策略。本研究考慮製造商與第三方業者在共同市場裡的競爭行為,其中將市場依顧客消費特性與製造商產品價格資訊公佈方法分為三種模型,分別為當市場中顧客類型皆為近視型顧客或是策略型顧客時的一般動態定價方法以及當市場中顧客類型為策略型顧客時製造商使用價格承諾的三種模型。
本研究利用逆推法求解三種模型,可以發現在任一個模型之中製造商皆擁有兩種定價策略(D1與D2),D1(D2)定價策略意指製造商預期第三方業者會根據利潤最大化之內部解(邊界解)來為其產品進行定價之決策,當兩種定價策略同時可行時,在製造商使用一般動態定價方法的情況之下,製造商皆會選擇使用D2定價策略,在製造商使用價格承諾的情況之下,D1與D2定價策略適用性取決於產品特性。
本研究發現製造商與第三方業者共同存在於同一個顧客市場時,製造商在一般動態定價方法的兩種定價策略下皆偏好面對策略型顧客,而對於第三方業者來說在製造商使用D1定價策略下,偏好面對近視型顧客,而在製造商使用D2定價策略下,當產品升級幅度較高或是產品耐用性較低時,第三方業者偏好面對近視型顧客。在製造商使用價格承諾方面,可以發現當製造商面對產品可升級幅度較高或是製造成本較低時,在使用D1定價策略下使用價格承諾是有利可圖的,而在使用D2定價策略的情況之下可以發現,製造商使用價格承諾所獲得的利潤大於使用一般動態定價方法所獲得的利潤,而第三方業者在產品升級幅度適中以及偏低或是產品耐用性適中以及偏高時較不願意看到製造商使用價格承諾,而當產品升級幅度偏高或是產品耐用性偏低時,第三方業者偏好見到製造商使用價格承諾。
This thesis studied a two-period pricing problem in which one manufacturer sells products in the first period and upgraded products in the second period, and the third party sells used products in the second period. It constructed three models according to customer characteristics and the timing of product price information announcement. The purpose of this study is to find the equilibrium decisions of the manufacturer and the third party under these three models.
There exist two pricing strategies for the manufacturer in each model. The first pricing strategy D1 refers to the manufacturer’s pricing strategy at which the third party’s constraint for its best-response price is non-binding, and the second pricing strategy D2 refers to the manufacturer’s pricing strategy at which the third party’s constraint for its best-response price is binding. Numerical analysis reveals that when the manufacturer uses the general dynamic pricing method, the D2 pricing strategy is a dominant strategy. The manufacturer prefers to face strategic customers under the D2 strategy, and the third party’s preference depends on product characteristics under the D2 strategy. In the case that the manufacturer uses the price commitment method with the D2 pricing strategy, the manufacturer’s profit is greater than the profit with the general dynamic pricing method, and the third party’s profit also improves when there is a larger product upgrade or the product is less durable.
Agrawal, V. V., Atasu, A., & Van Ittersum, K. (2015). Remanufacturing, third-party competition, and consumers' perceived value of new products. Management Science, 61(1), 60-72.
Arends, B. (2010). Why I don’t want an iPad for Christmas. Wall Street Journal (December 21).
Chen, J. M., & Chang, C. I. (2013). Dynamic pricing for new and remanufactured products in a closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 153-160.
Chen, J. M., & Hsu, Y. T. (2015). Trade-ins strategy for a durable goods firm facing strategic consumers. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 22(1), 183-194.
Chen, J. M., & Hsu, Y. T. (2017). Revenue management for durable goods using trade-ins with certified pre-owned options. International Journal of Production Economics, 186, 55-70.
Desai, P. S., & Purohit, D. (1999). Competition in durable goods markets: The strategic consequences of leasing and selling. Marketing Science, 18(1), 42-58.
Ferrer, G., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2006). Managing new and remanufactured products. Management Science, 52(1), 15-26.
Ferrer, G., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2010). Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 370-379.
Gao, P., Wang, X., Jing, Y., & Deng, L. (2015). Differentiated pricing policy for new, remanufactured and refurbished products. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 229(11), 2063-2075.
Han, X., Yang, Q., Shang, J., & Pu, X. (2017). Optimal strategies for trade-old-for-remanufactured programs: Receptivity, durability, and subsidy. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 602-616.
Kaya, O. (2010). Incentive and production decisions for remanufacturing operations. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 442-453.
Kremer, M., Mantin, B., & Ovchinnikov, A. (2017). Dynamic pricing in the presence of myopic and strategic consumers: theory and experiment. Production and Operations Management, 26(1), 116-133.
Liang, C., Çakanyıldırım, M., & Sethi, S. P. (2014). Analysis of product rollover strategies in the presence of strategic customers. Management Science, 60(4), 1033-1056.
Li, J., Granados, N., & Netessine, S. (2014). Are consumers strategic? Structural estimation from the air-travel industry. Management Science, 60(9), 2114-2137.
Li, W., Wu, H., & Deng, L. (2015). Decision-making based on consumers’ perceived value in different remanufacturing modes. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2015, 1-8.
Li, W., Wu, H., Jin, M., & Lai, M. (2017). Two-stage remanufacturing decision makings considering product life cycle and consumer perception. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 581-590.
Luo, Z., Chen, X., Chen, J., & Wang, X. (2017). Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 437-451.
Maiti, T., & Giri, B. C. (2017). Two-period pricing and decision strategies in a two-echelon supply chain under price-dependent demand. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 42, 655-674.
Mitra, S. (2016). Models to explore remanufacturing as a competitive strategy under duopoly. Omega, 59, 215-227.
Moorthy, K. S., & Png, I. P. (1992). Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Science, 38(3), 345-359.
Nair, H. (2007). Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 5(3), 239-292.
Örsdemir, A., Kemahlıoğlu‐Ziya, E., & Parlaktürk, A. K. (2014). Competitive quality choice and remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 23(1), 48-64.
Shankar, V., & Bolton, R. N. (2004). An empirical analysis of determinants of retailer pricing strategy. Marketing Science, 23(1), 28-49.
Shi, T., Gu, W., Chhajed, D., & Petruzzi, N. C. (2016). Effects of remanufacturable product design on market segmentation and the environment. Decision Sciences, 47(2), 298-332.
Shu, T., Liao, H., Chen, S., Wang, S., Lai, K. K., & Gan, L. (2016). Analysing remanufacturing decisions of supply chain members in uncertainty of consumer preferences. Applied Economics, 48(34), 3208-3227.
Shulman, J. D., Cunha Jr, M., & Saint Clair, J. K. (2015). Consumer uncertainty and purchase decision reversals: Theory and evidence. Marketing Science, 34(4), 590-605.
Tian, C., & Xiao, T. (2017). Profit of a Supply Chain versus its Decentralization in the Presence of Strategic Customers. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 16(6), 1647-1670.
Van Ackere, A., & Reyniers, D. J. (1995). Trade-ins and introductory offers in a monopoly. The RAND Journal of Economics, 26(1), 58-74.
Wang, S., Hu, Q., & Liu, W. (2017). Price and quality-based competition and channel structure with consumer loyalty. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(2), 563-574.
Xiao, Y. (2017). Choosing the right exchange-old-for-new programs for durable goods with a rollover. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 512-526.
Xiong, Y., Zhao, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Manufacturer-remanufacturing vs supplier-remanufacturing in a closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 176, 21-28.
Xiong, Y., Zhao, P., Xiong, Z., & Li, G. (2016). The impact of product upgrading on the decision of entrance to a secondary market. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(2), 443-454.
Yin, R., Li, H., & Tang, C. S. (2015). Optimal pricing of two successive‐generation Products with trade‐in options under uncertainty. Decision Sciences, 46(3), 565-595.
Zhao, P., & Xiong, Z. (2014). The strategy of new product introduction in durable goods with secondary market: application of the optimization method to supply chain problem. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014, 543092.
Zhu, X., Wang, M., Chen, G., & Chen, X. (2016). The effect of implementing trade-in strategy on duopoly competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(3), 856-868.
Zou, Z. B., Wang, J. J., Deng, G. S., & Chen, H. (2016). Third-party remanufacturing mode selection: Outsourcing or authorization?. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 87, 1-19.
校內:2023-06-21公開