在全球化與數位化加速推進的時代背景下，企業正面臨日益複雜且快速變化的競爭環境。特別是對於資源密集型產業如砂石業，市場需求波動、環境法規日益嚴格以及產業內部競爭壓力的增加，使得企業的生存與發展挑戰重重。如何透過動態能力的構建與應用，適應外部環境變化，並透過競合戰略實現合作與競爭的平衡，已成為該產業的重要議題。本研究在探討動態能力如何驅動砂石企業的競合戰略實施，進而推動企業的可持續發展。
本研究以X公司為研究對象，採用質性個案研究法，深入分析企業在面對市場挑戰時的策略調適過程，特別是其如何利用動態能力（如資源整合、組織學習與創新能力）來應對外部環境的不確定性。同時，本研究檢視了該企業如何在產業鏈中與競爭者建立合作關係，以實現資源共享與風險共擔，並通過競合戰略創造雙贏的局面。研究結果顯示，動態能力在砂石產業中發揮著關鍵作用，不僅有助於企業快速響應市場需求變化，還能支持其在激烈的競爭中保持韌性與競爭優勢。此外，競合戰略理論為砂石企業提供了一種整合內外部資源與能力的新模式，使企業能夠在競爭中找到合作的可能性，從而提升整體績效。
本研究填補了動態能力與競合戰略理論在砂石產業應用的學術空白，也為產業實務提供了具體參考建議。透過強化動態能力，企業可以更有效地應對市場挑戰，並在競合關係中創造更大的價值。本研究期望能為其他資源密集型產業的發展提供有益的啟示。

In the era of accelerating globalization and digitalization, businesses face increasingly complex and rapidly changing competitive environments. For resource-intensive industries such as the sand and gravel industry, fluctuations in market demand, stricter environmental regulations, and intensified internal competition have posed significant challenges to corporate survival and development. How to construct and apply dynamic capabilities to adapt to external environmental changes and achieve a balance between cooperation and competition through coopetition strategies has become a critical issue for this industry. This study aims to explore how dynamic capabilities drive the implementation of coopetition strategies in sand and gravel enterprises, thereby promoting sustainable corporate development.
This research focuses on FuXiang Sand & Stone Co., Ltd., adopting a qualitative case study method to analyze the company's strategy adjustment processes in response to market challenges. It particularly examines how the company leverages dynamic capabilities, such as resource integration, organizational learning, and innovation, to cope with uncertainties in the external environment. Furthermore, this study investigates how the company establishes cooperative relationships with competitors within the industry chain to achieve resource sharing and risk sharing, creating win-win outcomes through coopetition strategies. The findings reveal that dynamic capabilities play a crucial role in the sand and gravel industry, not only enabling companies to respond swiftly to market changes but also supporting resilience and competitive advantage amid intense competition. Additionally, coopetition strategy theory provides sand and gravel enterprises with a novel approach to integrating internal and external resources and capabilities, allowing them to identify cooperative opportunities within competitive environments and enhance overall performance.
This study not only fills the academic gap in applying dynamic capabilities and coopetition strategy theory to the sand and gravel industry but also offers practical recommendations for the industry. By strengthening dynamic capabilities, companies can more effectively address market challenges and create greater value within coopetitive relationships. It is hoped that this study will provide useful insights for the development of other resource-intensive industries.

一、英文文獻
Arranz, N., Arroyabe, M., Li, J., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2020). Innovation as a driver of eco‐innovation in the firm: An approach from the dynamic capabilities theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1494-1503.
Bailey, E. E., & Panzar, J. C. (1981). The contestability of airline markets during the transition to deregulation. Law and Contemporary Problems, 44(1), 125-145.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). "Coopetition" in business networks—to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411-426.
Brandenburger, A. M. (2017). Strategy needs creativity. Harvard Business Review, 95(2), 54-61.
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition. Doubleday.
Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. (1977). From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2), 241-261.
Christensen, L. R., & Greene, W. H. (1976). Economies of scale in U.S. electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy, 84(4), 655-676.
Dagnino, G. B. (2009). Coopetition strategy: A new kind of interfirm dynamics for value creation. In Coopetition strategy (pp. 45-63). Routledge.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2009). Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308-330.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650-663.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010.
Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., & Hanlon, S. C. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 110-141.
Ritala, P., Golnam, A., & Wegmann, A. (2014). Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon.com. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 236-249.
Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2009). What’s in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition. Technovation, 29(12), 819-828.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(3), 359-368.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.
二、中文文獻
(一) 碩博士論文
文庭章. (2008). 砂石貨運業評核機制之探討 中央警察大學. 交通管理研究所碩士論文.
王德耘. (2023). 新創企業發展動態能力之探索性研究: 以凱鈿行動科技為例 國立成功大學. 企業管理學系博碩士論文.
何文松. (2011). 企業動態能力與競爭優勢之研究-以台灣汽車零組件產業西進中國為例 國立臺北大學. 企業管理學系學位論文.
吳宜融. (2019). 第三方物流業者動態能力、雙元能力與績效之關係 國立臺灣海洋大學. 航運管理學系碩士論文.
徐榛良. (2023). 以商業生態系統觀點探討蛋雞產業之價值共創-F 公司為個案.國立屏東科技大學. 農企業管理系所碩士論文.
秦葦樺. (2024). 揭示智慧養雞廠之制度轉型歷程: 動態能力觀點 國立成功大學. 經營管理碩士學位學程博碩士論文.
黃子娜. (2017). 以競合觀點探討中小企業間之價值共創:以K公司的競合關係為例 國立成功大學.企業管理學系博碩士論文.
黃強倪. (2002). 企業水平競合分析模式之發展與應用-以大型購物中心為例 國立成功大學.企業管理學系博碩士論文.
楊晴雯. (2023). 以動態能力探討木材貿易商之競爭優勢-以台灣 T 公司為例 國立嘉義大學. 企業管理學系碩士論文.
葉浩. (2022). 平台生命週期之動態能力研究：以L公司為例 國立政治大學. 37. 企業管理研究所MBA學位學程論文.
簡俊雄. (2020). 以個案研究法探討台灣砂石業的經營策略與危機處理. 國立暨南國際大學.高階經營管理碩士學位學程學位論文. 1-36.
羅澄龍. (2006). 產業競合模式策略探討－以自行車產業為例 國立中央大學.資訊管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文.
(二) 期刊與文章
陳殷哲, & 侯春妃. (2021). 動態能力之統合分析研究 管理實務與理論研究, 15(1), 1-21.
陳世政. (2021). 臺灣砂石市場供需分析與探討. 營建知訊(461), 25-34.
鄒思宇, & 張俊鴻. (2024). 砂石市場趨勢分析與大數據技術應用. 營建知訊(494), 28-
林信華;陳錦嫣;陳文福. (2015). 取締違規砂石車之法令及其缺失問題之探討－以臺中市砂石車為例 坡地防災學報, 14(1), 1-16.
(三)、網路資料
經濟部地質調查及礦物管理中心 https://amis.mine.gov.tw/與土石資源服務平台https://amis.mine.gov.tw/know/relatedknow/intro.