永續概念的興起，影響了交通政策的發展方向，各種永續交通政策也隨之誕生，2017年高雄市舉辦的ICLEI生態交通全球盛典，哈瑪星地區被選為實施生態交通概念的示範場域，但是當地居民與各專家學者對於這項政策都有不同的聲音，盛典的推動亦受到當地各利害關係人群體的影響，讓高雄市政府展開了曲折的推動過程，所幸最後有如期舉行，但盛典結束後，各項生態交通措施並未能夠在哈瑪星當地有所延續，當地交通行為在盛典結束後，也恢復過去的仰賴私人運具的模式。本次研究希望透過蒐集二手資料、利害關係人之看法、哈瑪星社區當地之特色等資料，利用訪談的方式，並以紮根理論進行訪談資料的整理分析，並藉由路徑依賴、利害關係人參與等理論，分析各利害關係人對於生態交通全球盛典之觀點，探索哈瑪星地區到底太早引入轉型，亦或是錯過了一個轉型機會，進而提供後續政策執行參考，相關研究過程亦可提供日後其他地方辦理參與式規劃之參考。

The rise of the concept of sustainability has influenced the direction of transportation policy development, and various sustainable transport policies have been born accordingly. The 2017 ICLEI EcoMobility World Festival held in Kaohsiung , the Hamasen area was selected as a demonstration site for the implementation of the EcoMobility concept, but local residents, experts and scholars had different voices about this policy, and the promotion of the festival was influenced by various local stakeholders. Fortunately, the event was held as scheduled, but after the event, the EcoMobility measures did not continue in Hamasen, and the local traffic behavior reverted to the old mode of relying on private transportation after the event. This study aims to collect secondary data, stakeholder perceptions, and local characteristics of the Hamasen area, and analyze the interview data by Grounded theory. Through theories path dependency and stakeholder participation, we analyze the views of stakeholders on the EcoMobility World Festival and explore whether the Hamasen area has introduced transformation too early or missed an opportunity to transform, and provide reference for subsequent policy implementation.. The research process can also serve as a reference for future participatory planning in other places.

中文部分
王皓平. (2006). 地方利害關係人治理模式之研究：以臺北市大理街社區運動為例. 國立臺灣大學, Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2006.03138
王雯萱. (2012). 都市復甦–打狗驛站區之再生. (碩士). 國立成功大學, 台南市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/29t3r3
呂啟宏. (2012). 永續社區類型分類之研究. (碩士). 國立成功大學, 台南市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/z42std
宋威穎, 吳濟華, 曹瀚文, & 洪嘉聰. (2017). 高雄市交通型態轉型發展生態交通的困難與挑戰. 中國地方自治, 70(7), 3-17. doi:10.6581/lsgc.2017.70(07).02
宋威穎, 曹瀚文, & 侯彥廷. (2019). 高雄辦理生態交通全球盛典對哈瑪星社區衝擊與影響－政策利害關係人角度分析. 中國地方自治, 72(1), 3-27. doi:10.6581/lsgc.201901_72(1).0002
凃春杏. (2017). 誰在乎生態交通？影響哈瑪星居民生態交通行為意向之因素. (碩士). 國立中山大學, 高雄市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p7b8ax
施松汶（2011）。既有社區減碳潛力之研究-環保署低碳社區政策之改善建議。國立成功大學建築學系碩博士班碩士論文，台南市。 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3xax7k
柯於璋. (2015). 利害關係人分析在政策分析之應用－以大社石化專業工業區土地使用計畫為例. [Applying Stakeholder Analysis into Policy Analysis: The Case of the Future Land Use Plan of the Dashe Industrial Park]. 政策與人力管理, 6(2), 21-60. doi:10.29944/PPM.201512_6(2).0002
高雄市政府交通局. (2016). 2017 高雄生態交通全球盛典─哈瑪星生態交通示範計畫. 「城市發展」半年刊 第二十期, P26-46. Retrieved from https://research.kcg.gov.tw/Upload/EpaperFile/636057436865113955.pdf
張守真. (2000). 哈瑪星紀事. Retrieved from http://hamasen.tacocity.com.tw/
郭淑芳. (2004). 高雄市哈瑪星漁業的發展與變遷研究. (碩士). 國立高雄師範大學, 高雄市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/y5467y
陳韋任（2019）。生態交通社區評估模式之建立與應用。國立成功大學交通管理科學系碩士在職專班碩士論文，台南市。 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/au2pbq
曾冠球. (2017). 良善協力治理下的公共服務民間夥伴關係. 國土及公共治理季刊, 5(1), 67-79. Retrieved from https://www.AiritiLibrary.com/Publication/Index/P20150327001-201703-201703200012-201703200012-67-79
黃于津, & 李文環. (2015). 日治時期高雄市「哈瑪星」的移民與產業－以戶籍資料為主的討論. 高雄文獻, 5(1), 6-37. Retrieved from https://www.AiritiLibrary.com/Publication/Index/P20180309002-201504-201803310024-201803310024-6-37
董娟鳴. (2005). 西門徒步區步行者空間選擇影響因素之探討. [The Study of Influential Factors of Pedestrian Space Choice in Taipei Shi-Men Pedestrian Mall]. 中華技術學院學報(32), 101-113. doi:10.7095/JCIT.200505.0101
練福星, 林傑宏, & 侯雅壹. (2014). 低碳社區評估指標及排碳量推估. [Low-carbon Community Assessment Indicators and Estimate Carbon Emissions]. 健康與建築雜誌, 1(3), 1-9. doi:10.6299/JHA.2014.1.3.A1.1
鄭幸真, & 施植明. (2006). 當代行人徒步街發展研究－從德國經驗到台灣本土的實踐. [An Experimental Study on Pedestrian Mall-From the Development of German Experience to the Current Practices in Taiwan]. 設計學報, 11(2), 43-63. doi:10.6381/JD.200606.0043

英文部分
Abdullah, M., Ali, N., Hussain, S. A., Aslam, A. B., & Javid, M. A. (2021). Measuring changes in travel behavior pattern due to COVID-19 in a developing country: A case study of Pakistan. TRANSPORT POLICY, 108, 21-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.04.023
Axelsson, K., & Granath, M. (2018). Stakeholders' stake and relation to smartness in smart city development: Insights from a Swedish city planning project. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 693-702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.001
Banister, D. (2003). Critical pragmatism and congestion charging in London. International Social Science Journal, 55(176), 249-264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2003.05502006.x
Basbas, S., Campisi, T., Canale, A., Nikiforiadis, A., & Gruden, C. (2020). Pedestrian level of service assessment in an area close to an under-construction metro line in Thessaloniki, Greece. Transportation Research Procedia, 45, 95-102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.067
Benites, H. S., Osmond, P., & Rossi, A. M. G. (2020). Developing Low-Carbon Communities with LEED-ND and Climate Tools and Policies in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 146(1). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000545
Bickerstaff, K., Tolley, R., & Walker, G. (2002). Transport planning and participation: the rhetoric and realities of public involvement. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(1), 61-73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00027-8
Braithwaite, R. W. (2001). Tourism, Role of. In S. A. Levin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (pp. 667-679). New York: Elsevier. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00272-8
Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2022). Cycling through the COVID-19 Pandemic to a More Sustainable Transport Future: Evidence from Case Studies of 14 Large Bicycle-Friendly Cities in Europe and North America. Sustainability, 14(12). doi:10.3390/su14127293
Cairns, R. C. (2014). Climate geoengineering: issues of path-dependence and socio-technical lock-in. WIREs Climate Change, 5(5), 649-661. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.296
Campisi, T., Basbas, S., Tesoriere, G., Trouva, M., Papas, T., & Mrak, I. (2020). How to Create Walking Friendly Cities. A Multi-Criteria Analysis of the Central Open Market Area of Rijeka. Sustainability, 12(22), 20. doi:10.3390/su12229470
Castelein, B., van Duin, R., & Geerlings, H. (2019). Identifying Dominant Stakeholder Perspectives on Sustainability Issues in Reefer Transportation. A Q-Method Study in the Port of Rotterdam. Sustainability, 11(12), 3425. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/12/3425
Chalmers J, A. M. (2019). The Delphi Technique. Liamputtong P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_99
Daamen, T. A., & Vries, I. (2013). Governing the European port–city interface: institutional impacts on spatial projects between city and port. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 4-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.013
Davidson, D. J. (2010). The Applicability of the Concept of Resilience to Social Systems: Some Sources of Optimism and Nagging Doubts. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 23(12), 1135-1149. doi:10.1080/08941921003652940
De Vos, J. (2020). The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 5, 100121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121
Dobson, A. (2007). Green political thought: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964620
Dooms, M., Verbeke, A., & Haezendonck, E. (2013). Stakeholder management and path dependence in large-scale transport infrastructure development: the port of Antwerp case (1960–2010). Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 14-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.06.002
Esztergár-Kiss, D., & Tettamanti, T. (2019). 9 - Stakeholder engagement in mobility planning. In P. Coppola & D. Esztergár-Kiss (Eds.), Autonomous Vehicles and Future Mobility (pp. 113-123): Elsevier.
Ewing, R., Meakins, G., Hamidi, S., & Nelson, A. C. (2014). Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity – Update and refinement. Health & Place, 26, 118-126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.12.008
Firth, C. L., Stephens, Z. P., Cantinotti, M., Fuller, D., Kestens, Y., & Winters, M. (2021). Successes and failures of built environment interventions: Using concept mapping to assess stakeholder perspectives in four Canadian cities. Social Science & Medicine, 268, 113383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113383
Gaglione, F., Cottrill, C., & Gargiulo, C. (2021). Urban services, pedestrian networks and behaviors to measure elderly accessibility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 90, 102687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102687
Ghareeb, M., Salama, R., & ElSherbini, S. (2022). Impact of the sustainable waterfront proposed development of Bani-Suif corniche on the hydraulics of the Nile River. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 101845. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101845
Greater London Authority. (2020). AIR QUALITY IN LONDON 2016-2020 London Environment Strategy: Air Quality Impact Evaluation.
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y
Hagerman, C. (2007). Shaping neighborhoods and nature: Urban political ecologies of urban waterfront transformations in Portland, Oregon. Cities, 24(4), 285-297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2006.12.003
Hoyle, B. S. (1989). The port—City interface: Trends, problems and examples. Geoforum, 20(4), 429-435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(89)90026-2
Hrelja, R., Isaksson, K., & Richardson, T. (2013). Choosing conflict on the road to sustainable mobility: A risky strategy for breaking path dependency in urban policy making. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 195-205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.029
Hysing, E. (2009). Greening Transport—Explaining Urban Transport Policy Change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(3), 243-261. doi:10.1080/15239080903056417
ICLEI. (2020). Korea’s EcoMobility Cities celebrated M-LEAD Launch. Retrieved from https://sustainablemobility.iclei.org/koreas-ecomobility-cities-celebrated-m-lead-launch/
Le Pira, M., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Pluchino, A., & Rapisarda, A. (2016). Modelling stakeholder participation in transport planning. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 4(3), 230-238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2016.06.002
Lee, J., Arts, J., & Vanclay, F. (2021). Stakeholder views about Land Use and Transport Integration in a rapidly-growing megacity: Social outcomes and integrated planning issues in Seoul. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102759
Lima, J. P., & Machado, M. H. (2019). Walking accessibility for individuals with reduced mobility: A Brazilian case study. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(2), 269-279. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2019.02.007
Lindenau, M., & Böhler-Baedeker, S. (2014). Citizen and Stakeholder Involvement: A Precondition for Sustainable Urban Mobility. Transportation Research Procedia, 4, 347-360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.11.026
LONDON LIVING STREETS. (2020). LOW-TRAFFIC NEIGHBOURHOODS
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Priani, A., Connors, S., Péan, C., & Berger, S. (2021). IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK.
Medeiros, E. (2021). Urban participatory planning approaches in capital cities: the Lisbon case. EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1973379
Norcliffe, G., Bassett, K., & Hoare, T. (1996). The emergence of postmodernism on the urban waterfront: Geographical perspectives on changing relationships. Journal of Transport Geography, 4(2), 123-134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6923(96)00005-1
Nundy, S., Ghosh, A., Mesloub, A., Albaqawy, G. A., & Alnaim, M. M. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on socio-economic, energy-environment and transport sector globally and sustainable development goal (SDG). Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127705. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127705
Okraszewska, R., Romanowska, A., Wołek, M., Oskarbski, J., Birr, K., & Jamroz, K. (2018). Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning. Sustainability, 10(2). doi:10.3390/su10020479
Pira, M. L., Inturri, G., & Ignaccolo, M. (2020). Competence, interest and power in participatory transport planning: framing stakeholders in the “participation cube”. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 2385-2400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.281
Pulipati, S. B., & Mattingly, S. P. (2013). Establishing Criteria and their Weights for Evaluating Transportation Funding Alternatives Using a Delphi Survey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, 922-931. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.187
Puppim de Oliveira, J. A. (2019). Intergovernmental relations for environmental governance: Cases of solid waste management and climate change in two Malaysian States. Journal of Environmental Management, 233, 481-488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.097
Renault Group. (2020). LOW EMISSION ZONES (LEZS) IN EUROPE. Retrieved from https://www.renaultgroup.com/en/news-on-air/news/low-emission-zones-lezs-in-europe/
Schepel, S. (2005). WOONERF REVISITED, Delft as an example.
Serra-Coch, G., Chastel, C., Campos, S., & Coch, H. (2018). Graphical approach to assess urban quality: Mapping walkability based on the TOD-standard. Cities, 76, 58-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.007
Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2014). Neighborhood sustainability assessment in action: Cross-evaluation of three assessment systems and their cases from the US, the UK, and Japan. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 72, 243-258. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.006
Sustrans. (2020). What is a low traffic neighbourhood? Retrieved from https://www.sustrans.org.uk/our-blog/get-active/2020/in-your-community/what-is-a-low-traffic-neighbourhood/
Tracy Logan, R. M., Amy Young, Emily King. (2021). Low Traffic Neighbourhoods Residents' Survey.
Tran, V. D., Dorofeeva, V. V., Loskutova, E. E., Lagutkina, T. P., Kosova, I. V., Gribkova, E. I., . . . Cao, T. T. N. (2020). Elderly consumers' satisfaction with the quality of community pharmacy services in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a Q-methodology study. PHARMACIA, 67(4), 303-309. doi:10.3897/pharmacia.67.e56511
Transport for LONDON. APPENDIX SIX (A): SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDANCE ON LOW TRAFFIC NEIGHBOURHOODS.
UrbanAccessRegulationsinEurope. Impact of Low Emission Zones. Retrieved from https://urbanaccessregulations.eu/low-emission-zones-main/impact-of-low-emission-zones#Non-air%20quality%20impacts
UrbanAccessRegulationsinEurope. Low Emission Zones. Retrieved from https://urbanaccessregulations.eu/low-emission-zones-main
Wang, X. M., Zhao, G. C., He, C. C., Wang, X., & Peng, W. J. (2016). Low-carbon neighborhood planning technology and indicator system. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 57, 1066-1076. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.076
Wiegmans, B. W., & Louw, E. (2011). Changing port–city relations at Amsterdam: A new phase at the interface? Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 575-583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.06.007
Wilson, G. A. (2014). Community resilience: path dependency, lock-in effects and transitional ruptures. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(1), 1-26. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.741519
Wright, K., & Dia, H. (2019). Path Dependence: A Framework for Understanding Active Transport Implementation. Journal of Transport & Health, 14, 100749. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100749
Xia, T., Zhang, Y., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Crabb, S. (2017). Public attitudes toward encouraging sustainable transportation: An Australian case study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(8), 593-601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1287316
Zhao, X., Ke, Y., Zuo, J., Xiong, W., & Wu, P. (2020). Evaluation of sustainable transport research in 2000–2019. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120404