簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳宥銜
Chen, Yo-Shien
論文名稱: 半尺度七層樓RC結構受扭轉不規則之3D有限元素非線性分析研究
Study on the Nonlinear Finite Element 3D Analysis of Half-scale Seven-story RC structures with Torsional Irregularity
指導教授: 胡宣德
Hu, Hsuan-Teh
共同指導教授: 蕭輔沛
Hsiao, Fu-Pei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 195
中文關鍵詞: 半尺度七層樓RC結構物有限元素分析混凝土塑性損傷模型非線性扭轉扭轉不規則ABAQUS
外文關鍵詞: Half-scale seven-story RC structure, Finite element analysis, Concrete Damage Plastic model, Nonlinear torsion, Torsional irregularity, ABAQUS
相關次數: 點閱:113下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   有鑑於近年來921集集地震和2016年美濃地震造成的地震危害,台灣的鋼筋混凝土結構易受到偏心和扭轉不規則的破壞。因此,專家和學者們致力於扭轉不規則結構的抗倒塌分析和模擬,並使用大型振動台試驗針對一系列具有不同扭轉不規則來源的半尺度七層樓鋼筋混凝土結構進行測試,期望可以對鋼筋混凝土結構的非線性扭轉反應進行研究。
      本研究旨在透過NCREE所進行的振動台試驗,研究既有鋼筋混凝土建築物在近斷層地震作用下的非線性扭轉行為,並強調軟弱底層系統的特性。搭配使用有限元素分析軟體“ ABAQUS”進行動力分析,並詳細討論如何建立合適的分析模型來有效地模擬其結構勁度、混凝土的塑性行為、破壞模式和非線性扭轉反應。最終,將通過模擬分析獲得的動態行為和相關數據與NCREE量測到的實驗數據進行比較,討論非線性扭轉分析技術的準確性,並提出結論和未來的建議。

    In view of the recent earthquake damage caused by the 921 Chi-Chi Earthquake and the 2016 Meinong Earthquake, reinforced concrete structures in Taiwan are vulnerable to eccentric and irregular torsional damage. Therefore, experts and scholars are devoted to the analysis and simulation of the collapse resistance of the structures with torsional irregularity, and a series of half-scale seven-story reinforced concrete structures with different sources of irregularities were tested on the shake-table at the National Earthquake Engineering Research Center (NCREE) Tainan laboratory. It is expected that the nonlinear torsional response of the reinforced concrete structures can be experimentally studied.
    This study aims to research the nonlinear torsional behavior of existing reinforced concrete buildings under seismic motion through the shake-table tests performed by NCREE, and emphasize the characteristics of the weak first-story system, and use the finite element software “ABAQUS” for dynamic analysis, which discusses in detail how to establish an appropriate analysis model to effectively simulate its stiffness, plastic behavior of concrete, failure mode and nonlinear torsional response. Finally, the dynamic behavior and related data obtained by simulation are compared with the experimental data measured by NCREE to discuss the accuracy of the analysis technology for nonlinear torsion, and draw conclusions and future suggestions.

    ABSTRACT II 摘要 III ACKNOWLEDGMENTS IV ARTICLES OUTLINE V TABLES OUTLINE XI FIGURES OUTLINE XIII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Objective 2 1.3 Thesis structure 2 1.4 Research procedure 3 CHAPTER 2 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS 4 2.1 Concrete model 4 2.1.1 ABAQUS concrete model 4 2.1.2 Concrete Damaged Plastic Model (CDP) 5 2.1.3 Compressive stress, strain and damage behavior 6 2.1.4 Tensile stress, strain and damage behavior 9 2.1.5 CDP plastic behavior 11 2.2 Steel model 15 2.3 Finite element analysis 16 2.3.1 Element type 17 2.3.1.1 Solid element 17 2.3.1.2 Truss element 19 2.3.2 Analytical method 19 2.3.2.1 Static nonlinear analysis 20 2.3.2.2 Dynamic analysis 20 2.4 Literature review of NCREE shak-table test 21 2.5 Torsional iregularity effect 22 CHAPTER 3 COMPONENT PUSHOVER ANALYSIS 23 3.1 Test introduction 23 3.1.1 Test specimen introduction 23 3.1.2 Test procedure 28 3.1.2.1 Column 28 3.1.2.2 Beam-column joint 29 3.1.3 Measuring instruments 30 3.1.3.1 Column 30 3.1.3.2 Beam-column joint 31 3.1.4 Test results 32 3.1.4.1 Column 32 3.1.4.2 Beam-column joint 33 3.2 Numerical model 35 3.2.1 Model introduction 35 3.2.1.1 Column model 35 3.2.1.2 Beam-column joint model 35 3.2.2 Model size 36 3.2.3 Material properties 37 3.2.3.1 Steel 37 3.2.3.2 Concrete 38 3.2.4 Boundary condition and contact condition 42 3.2.4.1 Column model 42 3.2.4.2 Beam-column joint model 42 3.2.5 Elements and meshing 43 3.3 Numerical results compared with experiments 44 3.3.1 Analysis results of the column model 44 3.3.2 Analysis results of the beam-column joint model 47 3.3.3 Comparison result discussion 50 CHAPTER 4 THREE-DIRECTION DYNAMIC SEISMIC DURATION ANALYSIS 51 4.1 Test introduction 51 4.1.1 Test specimen introduction 51 4.1.2 Seismic duration 53 4.1.3 Measuring instruments 56 4.1.4 Test results 57 4.1.4.1 Photos after earthquake inputs 57 4.1.4.2 Acceleration and Displacement test data 60 4.2 Numerical model 66 4.2.1 Model introduction 66 4.2.2 Model size 66 4.2.3 Material properties 69 4.2.3.1 System identification period 69 4.2.3.2 Modal analysis 71 4.2.3.3 Concrete 75 4.2.3.4 Steel 75 4.2.4 Boundary conditions 76 4.2.5 Contact conditions 77 4.2.6 Elements and meshing 77 4.3 Numerical results compared with experiments 78 4.3.1 CHY063-50% 78 4.3.2 CHY063-100% 83 4.3.3 CHY063-150% 89 4.3.4 CHY063-200% 95 4.3.5 Peak displacement response of each floor 101 4.3.6 Diaphragm rotation 103 4.3.7 CHY063-100% resonance response correction 107 4.3.7.1 100%-Correction 1 107 4.3.7.2 100%-Correction 2 112 4.3.7.3 100%-Correction 3 116 4.3.8 Comparison result discussion 120 CHAPTER 5 DYNAMIC SEISMIC DURATION ANALYSIS WITH TORSIONAL IRREGULARITY 121 5.1 Test introduction 121 5.1.1 Test specimen introduction 123 5.1.2 Seismic duration 126 5.1.3 Measuring instruments 128 5.1.4 Test results 129 5.1.4.1 Photos after earthquake inputs 129 5.1.4.2 Acceleration and Displacement test data 134 5.2 Numerical model 141 5.2.1 Model introduction 141 5.2.2 Model size 141 5.2.3 Material properties 144 5.2.3.1 System identification period 144 5.2.3.2 Modal analysis 144 5.2.3.3 Masonry wall 145 5.2.3.4 Concrete 146 5.2.3.5 Steel 151 5.2.4 Boundary conditions 151 5.2.5 Contact conditions 152 5.2.6 Elements and meshing 152 5.3 Numerical results compared with experiments 152 5.3.1 Series-1A 153 5.3.2 Series-1B 164 5.3.3 Series-2 174 5.3.4 Peak displacement response of each floor 177 5.3.5 Diaphragm rotation 181 5.3.6 2-40% resonance response correction 188 5.3.7 Comparison result discussion 189 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 190 6.1 Conclusion 190 6.2 Suggestion 192 REFFERENCE 193

    [1] Abaqus (2018). Abaqus analysis user's manual Vol. 3 Materials. Dassault Systèmes Simulia.
    [2] J. J. Lubliner, S. O. Oliver, and E. Oñate (1989). A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 25(3), 229-326.
    [3] J. Lee, and G. L. Fenves (1998). Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124(8), 892-900.
    [4] L. Saenz (1964). "Equation for the stress-strain curve of concrete" by Desayi P, and Krishnan S. Journal of ACI Structural, 61(9), 1229-1235.
    [5] A. A. Elwi, and D. W. Murray (1979). A 3D hypoelastic concrete constitutive relationship. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 105(4), 623-641.
    [6] V. Birtel, P. Mark, and R. Bochum (2006). Parameterised finite element modeling of RC beam shear failure. Ruhr university institute for reinforced and prestressed concrete structures.
    [7] B. L. Wahalathantri, D. P. Thambiratnam, T. H. T. Chan, and S. Fwzia (2011). A material model for flexural crack simulation in reinforced concrete elements using ABAQUS. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Engineering, Designing the built Environment for sustainable Wellbeing.
    [8] P. Kmiecik, and M. Kamiński (2011). Modelling of reinforced concrete structures and composite structures with concrete strength degradation taken into consideration. Journal of Archives of civil and mechanical engineering, 11(3), 623-636.
    [9] R. Pascu (2008). Behavior and computation of reinforced concrete elements. Technical University of Civil Engineering.
    [10] Abaqus theory manual (2007). Dassault Systèmes Simulia.
    [11] P. Pita (2018). Studies on behavior of non-ductile reinforced concrete columns and beam-column joints subjected to cyclic loading. Master’s Thesis, National Cheng Kung University.
    [12] G. S. Lisha (2018). Finite element 3D modeling of reinforced concrete structures subject to earthquake loading. Master’s Thesis, National Cheng Kung University.
    [13] L-Y. Chan (2019). Nonlinear Finite Element 3D Analysis of Non-ductile RC Structures Subjected to Near-fault Ground Motions. Master’s Thesis, National Cheng Kung University.
    [14] ASCE (1982). State of the art report on finite element analysis of reinforced concrete. New York: Task committee on concrete and masonry structures.
    [15] ACI318-14 (2014). Building Code Requirement for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-2014) and Commentary (318R-2014). Mich: American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills.
    [16] 中華民國內政部營建署(2019),混凝土結構設計規範。
    [17] A. K. Chopra (2011). Dynamics of structions Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Pearson College Div.
    [18] P. D. Shambhu, and C. Indrajit (2003). Computation of Rayleigh Damping Coefficients for Large Systems. Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India.
    [19] T. Suzuki, K. J. Elwood, A. Y. Puranam, H-J. Lee, F-P. Hsiao, and S-J. Hwang (2020). Shake-Table Tests of Seven-story Reinforced Concrete Structures with Torsional Irregularities.
    [20] T. Suzuki, A. Y. Puranam, K. J. Elwood, H-J. Lee, R-J. Tsai, F-P. Hsiao, and S-J. Hwang (2019). Seismic Response of Half-scale Seven-story Reinforced Concrete structure with Torsional and Damage Irregularities.
    [21] T. Suzuki, K. J. Elwood, A. Y. Puranam, H-J. Lee, R-J. Tsai, F-P. Hsiao, and S-J. Hwang (2020). Seismic Response of Half-scale Seven-story Reinforced Concrete systems with Torsional Irregularities: Test results.
    [22] DesignSafe-CI. Experiments details and Test data for indexing. Retrieved from: https://www.designsafe-ci.org/#learning (accessed April 16, 2020)
    [23] L-W. Yu (2019). Shaking Table Test of 1/2-Scale Non-Ductile RC Buildings subjected to Near Fault Earthquakes. Master’s Thesis, National Cheng Kung University.
    [24] Y-T. Hu (2020). Seismic Detailed Assessment of the RC Building with Torsional Irregularity. Master’s Thesis, National Cheng Kung University.

    下載圖示 校內:2025-07-16公開
    校外:2025-07-16公開
    QR CODE