簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 賴昱君
Lai, Yu-Chun
論文名稱: 以動態觀點探討情緒轉換對創造思考歷程之影響
Investigating the effects of Emotional shift on Creative thinking process with a dynamic perspective
指導教授: 彭淑玲
Peng, Shu-Ling
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 教育研究所
Institute of Education
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 97
中文關鍵詞: 情緒轉換解題時期創造思考歷程發想評鑑
外文關鍵詞: emotional shift, idea production time, creative thinking process, ideation, evaluation
相關次數: 點閱:101下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究主要研究目的為:(一)探討大學生在不同的解題時期下,情緒轉換對創造思考歷程之發想能力的影響。(二)探討大學生的情緒轉換對創造思考歷程之評鑑能力的影響。
    據此,針對創造思考歷程之發想能力部分,本研究採用5(情緒轉換組別)× 3(解題時期)二因子混合樣本實驗設計,考驗不同情緒轉換與解題時期在創造思考歷程之發想能力上的交互作用;而針對創造思考歷程之評鑑能力,本研究採用單因子獨立樣本變異數分析,考驗不同情緒轉換對創造思考歷程之評鑑能力的效果。為完成上述研究目的,本研究抽取150位大學生為研究樣本,而在刪除情緒操弄不成功及作答不完整者後實得受試者為133人,進行一對一的實驗操弄,用以探討不同情緒轉換組別在前、中、後三個解題時期的創造力表現。研究工具包含自傳式回憶作業(正、負向情緒)、日常生活回憶作業(中性情緒)、身心狀態調查表及語文創造思考測驗。本研究以二因子混合樣本實驗設計及單因子獨立樣本變異數分析來考驗本研究假設。
    本研究結果發現如下:
    一、在創造思考歷程發想階段方面:
    (一)流暢力:在解題前期,正向情緒比起中性情緒及負向情緒較能促進個體的流暢力表現。在解題中期及解題後期,五個情緒轉換組別的流暢力表現沒有不同。C→P組的流暢力表現會隨著解題時間下滑,而N→P組及C組的流暢力表現僅有從解題前期至解題中期下滑;P→N組與C→N組的流暢力表現在三個解題時期皆沒有變化。
    (二)變通力:在解題前期,正向情緒比起中性情緒及負向情緒較能促進個體的變通力表現。在解題中期及解題後期,五個情緒轉換組別的變通力表現沒有不同。N→P組與C→P組的變通力表現會隨著解題時間下滑;P→N組的變通力表現在三個解題時期沒有變化;C→N組的變通力表現僅有從解題前期及解題中期下滑;C組的變通力表現從解題前期至解題中期下滑。
    (三)獨創力:在解題前期與解題中期,正向情緒比起中性情緒及負向情緒較能促進個體的獨創力表現。在解題後期,五個情緒轉換組別的獨創力表現沒有不同。N→P組的獨創力表現會隨著解題時間下滑,而C→P組的獨創力表現僅有從解題前期至解題中期下滑;P→N組的獨創力表現會隨著解題時間上升,而C→N組的獨創力表現僅有從解題中期至解題後期上升;C組的獨創力表現在三個解題時期皆沒有變化。
    (四)創造力:在解題前期與解題中期,正向情緒比起中性情緒及負向情緒較能促進
    個體的創造力表現。在解題後期,五個情緒轉換組別的創造力表現沒有不同。
    N→P組的創造力表現會隨著解題時間下滑,而C→P組的創造力表現僅有從解題前期至解題中期下滑;C→N組的創造力表現會隨著解題時間上升,而P→N組的創造力表現僅有從解題前期至解題中期上升;C組的創造力表現在三個解題時期皆沒有變化。
    二、在創造思考歷程評鑑階段方面:
    (一)不同情緒轉換組別在準確個數比率及不準確程度上的表現沒有不同。
    (二)負向情緒結尾組別在高估比率上的表現會優於正向情緒結尾組別。
    (三)正向情緒結尾組別在低估比率上的表現會優於負向情緒結尾組別。

    This purpose of this study is to (1) explore the effects of emotional shift and idea production time on creative ideation process, and (2) explore the effects of emotional shift on creative evaluation process. For the first purpose, the study conducted a two-way mixed design ANOVA:5(group) × 3(production time). For the second purpose, the study conducted a one-way ANOVA. A total of 150 university student participants as the research subjects. The participants completed an autobiographical memory task (positive/negative emotion), daily life task (neutral emotion), emotional state scale and “Unusual uses of chopsticks”.The result indicated that positive emotion produce more creativity than neutral emotion and negative emotion in early idea production time, and people in positive emotion are more likely to underestimate their creativity, and people in negative emotion are more likely to overestimate their creativity.

    目次 中文摘要 I 英文摘要 III 目次 VI 表目次 VII 圖目次 IX 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 4 第三節 名詞釋義 5 第二章 文獻探討 10 第一節 創造力的意涵與測量 10 第二節 情緒與創造力之關係 19 第三章 研究方法 32 第一節 研究對象 32 第二節 實驗設計 32 第三節 研究假設 36 第四節 研究工具 37 第五節 資料分析 42 第四章 研究結果 43 第一節 基本統計分析 43 第二節 情緒轉換組別與解題時期對創造思考歷程發想階段之交互效果 48 第三節 情緒轉換組別對創造思考歷程評鑑階段之效果 61 第五章 討論、結論與建議 65 第一節 討論 65 第二節 結論 78 第三節 建議 81 參考文獻 85 一、中文部分 85 二、西文部分 86 附錄一 自傳式回憶作業-負向情緒 93 附錄二 自傳式回憶作業-正向情緒 94 附錄三 日常生活回憶作業-中性情緒 95 附錄四 身心狀態調查表 96 附錄五 竹筷子的不尋常用途測驗-發想能力 97 附錄六 竹筷子的不尋常用途測驗-評鑑能力 97

    一、中文部分
    王強之(1998)。心情一致性主觀機率判斷的理論模式驗證(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁大學,臺北市。
    李乙明(2006)。陶倫斯創造思考測驗。臺北市:心理。
    吳靜吉、林偉文、林士郁、王涵儀、陳秋秀、曾敬梅、徐悅淇(2002)。國際創造力教育趨勢及其對我國創造力教育的啟示。學生輔導雙月刊,79,80-97。
    吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998)。新編創造思考測驗研究。臺北市:教育部。
    吳靜吉、樊學良(2011)。台灣創造力教育相關政策與實踐經驗。創造學刊,2(1),5-28。
    林幸台、王木榮(1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗。臺北市:心理。
    邱皓政(2002)。學校組織創新氣氛的內涵與教師創造力的實踐:另一件國王的新衣?應用心理研究,15,191-224。
    邱發忠(2005)。創造力認知運作機制之探究。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    教育部(2003)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北市:教育部。
    教育部(2004)。創意台灣,全球布局-培育各盡奇才新國民。臺北市:教育部。
    黃瑜(2006)。情感特質、情緒狀態及解題時期對創造力表現之影響。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    葉玉珠、吳靜吉、鄭英耀(2000)。影響科技與資訊產業人員創意發展的因素之量表編製。師大學報:科學教育類,45(2),39-63。
    鄭欣怡(2006)。正負向情緒與基模對創造認知歷程之影響。國立交通大學,新竹市。


    二、西文部分
    Amabile, T., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987). Creativity in the R&D laboratory(Vol. 30).New York: Greensboro.
    Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood -creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological bulletin, 134(6), 779-806.
    Barron, F. (1988). Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 76-98). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Bartlett, J. C., & Santrock, J. W. (1979). Affect-dependent episodic memory in young children. Child Development, 513-518.
    Bledow, R., Rosing, K., & Frese, M. (2013). A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 432-450.
    Brave, S., Nass, C., & Hutchinson, K. (2005). Computers that care : investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied computer agent. International journal of human-computer studies, 62(2), 161-178.
    Brewer, D., Doughtie, E. B., & Lubin, B. (1980). Induction of mood and mood shift. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(1), 215-226.
    Cropley, A. J. (1999). Definitions of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.). Encyclopedia of creativity (vol. 1, pp. 511–524). San Diego, CA: Academic.
    Cropley, A. J. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity research journal, 18(3), 391-404.
    Egloff, B. (1998). The independence of positive and negative affect depends on the affect measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(6), 1101-1109.

    Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
    Florida, R., & Lee, S. Y. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional studies, 38(8), 879-891.
    Fong, C. T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1016-1030.
    Gardner, H. (2000). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books.
    Gasper, K. (2003). When necessity is the mother of invention: Mood and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(3), 248-262.
    Gasper, K. (2004). Permission to seek freely? The effect of happy and sad moods on generating old and new ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2-3), 215-229.
    George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622.
    Groborz, M., & Necka, E. (2003). Creativity and cognitive control: Explorations of generation and evaluation skills. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 183-197.
    Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
    Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological bulletin, 53(4), 267.
    Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3-14
    Hirt, E. R., Devers, E. E., & McCrea, S. M. (2008). I want to be creative: exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of personality and social psychology, 94(2), 214.

    Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-75). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
    Isen, A. M., & Gorgoglione, J. M. (1983). Some specific effects of four affect-induction procedures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(1), 136-143.
    Kaufmann, G. (2003). Expanding the mood-creativity equation. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 131-135.
    Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (1997). “Paradoxical effects of mood on creative problem solving. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 151–170.
    Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (2002). The effects of mood on early and late idea production. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3-4), 317-330.
    Kuhl, J. (2000). The volitional basis of Personality Systems Interaction Theory: Applications in learning and treatment contexts. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(7), 665-703.
    Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European journal of social psychology, 3(4), 361-388.
    Levine, S. R., Wyer, R. S., & Schwarz, N. (1994). Are you what you feel? The affective and cognitive determinants of self‐judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 63-77.
    Loeb, D. F., Stoke, C. (2001). Language changes associated with fast for word language evidence from case studies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(3), 216-230.
    Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and Problem Solving (pp. 289-332). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 295-308.
    Martin, M. (1990). On the induction of mood. Clinical Psychology Review, 10(6), 669-697.
    Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological review, 69(3), 220.
    Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity research journal, 15(2-3), 107-120.
    Niedenthal, P. M., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2006). Psychology of emotion: Interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches. American Psychologist Press.
    Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36-45.
    Panksepp, J. (1995). The emotional sources of " chills" induced by music. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13(2), 171-207.
    Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior workbook. New York, NY: Scribner.
    Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. Strenberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35-61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Rank, J., & Frese, M. (2008). The impact of emotions, moods and other affect-related variables on creativity, innovation and initiative. In N. Ashkanasy, & C. Copper (Eds.), Research companion to emotion in organizations. An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
    Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
    Richards, R. (1999). The “four P’s” of creativity. In M. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 733-742). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Runco, M. A. (1985). Reliability and convergent validity of ideational flexibility as a function of academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61 (3), 1075-1081.
    Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
    Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative Runco, M. A., (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological measurement, 52(1), 213-221.
    Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 93–96.
    Runco, M. A., & Basadur, M. (1993). Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2(3), 166-173.
    Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational psychology review, 7(3), 243-267.
    Runco, M. A., & Mraz, W. (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological measurement, 52(1), 213-221.
    Russell, J. A., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 38(2), 311-322.
    Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 55-71). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
    Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., & Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68.

    Stein, K. B. (1967). Correlates of the ideational preference dimension among prison inmates. Psychological reports, 21(2), 553-562.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.
    Sutherland, G., Newman, B., & Rachman, S. (1982). Experimental investigations of the relations between mood and intrusive unwanted cognitions. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 55(2), 127-138.
    SuzanneK. Vosburg, G. K. (1997). 'Paradoxical' Mood Effects on Creative Problem solving. Cognition & Emotion, 11(2), 151-170.
    Teasdale, J. D., & Russell, M. L. (1983). Differential effects of induced mood on the recall of positive, negative and neutral words. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(3), 163-171.
    Tice, D. M., Baumeister, R. F., Shmueli, D., & Muraven, M. (2007). Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of experimental social psychology, 43(3), 379-384.
    Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
    Torrance, E. P. (1962). Non-test ways of identifying the creatively gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 6(3), 71-75.
    Torrance, E. P. (1969). Prediction of adult creative achievement among high school seniors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 13(4), 223-229.
    Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
    Velten, E. (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behaviour research and therapy, 6(4), 473-482.
    Wakefield, J. F. (1992). Creative thinking: Problem solving skills and the arts orientation. Norwood, NJ: Ablex..
    Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2023-01-01公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE