簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 翁慈婉
Wong, Cih-wan
論文名稱: 會計人員盈餘管理道德觀之研究
A Study on Morality of Earnings Management for Accountants
指導教授: 林松宏
Lin, Song-Horng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accountancy
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 69
中文關鍵詞: 道德強度盈餘管理道德決策過程問題權變模型
外文關鍵詞: Moral intensity, Earnings management, Ethical decision process, Issue contingency model
相關次數: 點閱:65下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究參考Jones (1991)道德權變模型,以十三個盈餘管理情境及四個道德兩難情境,探討(1) 在不同盈餘管理方法下,道德強度對盈餘管理議題之道德決策之影響;(2)道德強度對會計人員道德決策過程三階段:道德認知、道德判斷、道德決策之預測效果。
    研究結果發現: (1) 在不同盈餘管理方法下,道德強度中「社會共識」構面對盈餘管理道德意圖具有顯著預測能力。 (2) 在各情境下道德強度均對道德決策各階段:道德知覺、道德判斷及道德意圖有顯著預測能力,顯示Jones(1991)道德權變模型是適合衡量會計議題的道德決策模式。

    The study was based on the Issue Contingency Model by Jones (1991). I adopted thirteen scenarios of earning management issues and four ethical issues. The first purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of moral intensity on earning management with different earning management method. The second purpose was to validate the predictability between moral intensity and the three stages on ethical decision process: moral recognition, moral judgment and moral intention..
    Empirical results of this study indicate that (1) The dimension of moral intensity: social consensus is significantly predictable to ethical intention of earning management on different earning management method.(2) moral intensity were proven to be significantly predictable to variables in each stage of ethical decision process:ethical recognition、ethical judgment and ethical intention. Such results suggest that the Issue Contingency is a suitable model for measuring ethical decisions in accounting industry.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 論文貢獻 3 第三節 研究流程與論文架構 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 倫理、道德之定義 6 第二節 盈餘管理 8 第二節 道德決策模型之相關文獻 10 第三節 Jones問題權變模型 14 第三章 研究方法 22 第一節 研究架構 22 第二節 研究假說 24第三節 問卷設計與變數操作定義 26 第四節 研究對象與樣本特性描述 30 第五節 資料分析方法 32 第四章 研究結果與討論 33 第一節 問卷信度分析 33 第二節 研究變項之描述性統計分析 34 第三節 道德強度對盈餘管理意圖之影響 36 第四節 道德強度對道德各階段之影響 38 第五章 結果討論與建議 48 第一節 研究結果與討讑 48 第二節 研究建議 51 參考文獻 53 附錄一:問卷 60

    中文部分:
    1. 方能御譯(1993),道德發展心理學,臺灣商務,臺北市。
    2. 袁國寧、王鳳生(1997),倫理、訊息傳遞與競爭性保險市場效率,中山管理評論,第5卷, 75-95,
    3. 余春達(2001)。不確定環境下資訊倫理決策行為探討。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    4.陳依蘋(2002),「革新法案真能革新?」,會計研究月刊,第202期,頁14-17。
    5. 林煌(1991),道德判斷與道德價值取向之相關研究,國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    6. 柯秋萍(2005),價值觀、道德發展期及職業道德知覺關聯性之研究—以金融相關從業人員為例。私立中原大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。
    7. 袁世樽(1998),行銷人員行銷道德決策過程之研究,中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    8. 翁煌哲(2001),以道德強度模型檢測道德判斷與軟體盜版意圖,國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    9. 陳明海(2005),道德強度與道德判斷對消費者購買網路非法數位音樂之影響,國立東華大學國際企業學系碩士論文。 
    10.黃肇陽 (2006) ,金融業理財業務人員行銷道德決策過程之研究。南台科技大學,高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文。 
    英文部分:
    1. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein M., (1980),Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall.
    2. Barton,J.,(2001),Does the Use of Financial Derivatives Affect Earnings Management Decisions?The Accounting Review 76,1-26
    3. Beauchamp, T. L. & Bowie, N. E., (1983). Ethical Theory and Business. N.J,Prentice Hall.
    4. Bird, F., & Gandz, J., (1991). Good Management: Business Ethics in Action, Prentice Hall.
    5. Bommer, M., Gratto, C., Gravander, J. & Tuttle, M., (1987). A Behavioral Modelof Ethical and Unethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 6, 4,265-280.
    6. Chia, A. & Mee, L. S.,(2000). The Effects of Issue Characteristics on the Recognition of Moral Issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 3, 255-269.
    7.Chin S. Ou , Chia Ling Lee, and Mau Kun Chan,(2004),An Empirical Study of the Relationship Between Income Manipulations and Operating Risks in Taiwanese Firms, Journal of Risk Management.
    8. Cottone, R. R. and Claus, R. E., (2000), Ethical Decision-Making Models: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Counseling & Development 78, 275-283
    9. Davis, M. A., Brown, J., Ohmer, N., andDouglas, G. (1998) Issue-contingent effects on ethical decision making: A cross-culturalcomparison, Journal of Business Ethics17, 373-389.
    10. Deborah L. Leitsch(2004). Differences in the Perceptions of Moral Intensity in the Moral Decision Process: An Empirical Examination of Accounting Students. Journal of Business Ethics, 53: 313–323.
    11. Dechow, P. R. G. Sloan and A.P. Sweeney,(1996),Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation:An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC,Contemportary Accounting Research 13,1-36.
    12. DeGeorge, R. R. (1982). Business Ethics. N.Y.,Macmillan Publishing.
    13. Dubinsky, A. J. and Loken, B., (1989), Analyzing Ethical Decision Making In Marketing,Journal of Business Research 19, 83-107
    14. Dukerich, J. M., Waller, M. J., George, E., and Huber, G. P. ,( 1993) ,Moral Intensity in Group Problem Solving, Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings, Atlanta, GA
    15. Dunfee, T. W., Craig Smith, N. & Ross Jr, W. T., (1999). Social Contracts and Marketing Ethics. Journal of Marketing, 63, 3, 14-32.
    16. Ferrell, O. C. and Gresham, L. G., (1985), A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing, Journal of Marketing, Vol 49, 87-96.

    17. Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G. and Fraedrich, J., (1989), A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Making for Marketing, Journal of Macromarketing, Fall, 55-64.
    18. Fischer, M. and K.Rosenzweig,(1995),Attitudes of Stundents and Accounting Practioners Concerning the Ethical Acceptability of Earnings Management,Journal of Business Ethics 14,433-444.

    19. Flannery, B. L. & May, D. R., (2000). Environmental Ethical Decision Making in the U.S. Metal-Finishing Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 4,642-662.
    20. Ford, R. C. & Richardson, W. D., (1994). Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 3, 205-211.
    21. Franke, G.. R., Deborah, F. C. & Deborah, F. S., (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: a social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 6, 920-34.
    22. Fritzsche, D. J. and Becker H. ,(1983), EthicalBehavior of Marketing Managers,Journal of Business Ethics (2), 291-299.
    23. Fritzsche, D. J. and Becker , H. , (1988), An Examination of Marketing Ethics: Role of the Decision Maker, Consequences of Decision, Management Position and Sex of theRespondent, Journal of Macromarketing 8(2), 29-39.
    24. Glover, S. H., Bumpus, N. A., Logan, J. E. & Ciesla, J. R., (1997). Re-examining the influence of individual values on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 12/13, 1319-29.
    25. Healy,P.M. and J.M.Wahlen,(1999),A Review of the Earnings Mangement Literture and its Implications for Standard Setting,Accounting Horizon 13,365-383.
    26. Hosmer, L. T., (1985). Moral Standards for Strategic Decisions: The Philosophical Tool. In Handbook of Business Strategy, Gutheds, W. D., Boston, Warren, Gorham,& Lamont Inc.
    27. Hunt, S. D. & Vitell, S., (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6, 1, 5-16.
    28. Hunt, S. D. and Vasquez-Parraga A. Z., (1993), Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics, and Salesforce Supervision, Journal of Marketing Research System, Vol 15, 78-90.
    29. Jalajas, D. S., (1993), Ethical Deciaion Making in College Student: A Test of Jones’s Moral Intensity Concept, Paper presented at the Eastern Academy of Management Meeting, Providence, Rhode Island.
    30. Janet M. and Dukerich Mary J.( 2000) . Moral Intensity and Managerial Problem Solving, Journal of Business Ethics ,24: 29–38.
    31. Jones, E. E., and McGills , D.(1991) Correspondent Inferences and the Attribution Cube: A Comparative Appraisal,In New Directions in Attribution research (Vol. 1),
    32 . Jones, T. M. and Huber, V. L. , (1992), Issue Contingency in Ethical Decision Making, 3rd Annual Conference of the International Association for Business and Society.
    33. Jones, T. M,(1991,) “Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model,” Academy of Management Review (16:2), 366-395
    34. Joseph G. P. Paolillo(2002).An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Selected Personal,Organizational and Moral Intensity Factors on Ethical Decision Making.Journal of Business Ethics ,35: 65–74.
    35. Kaszick,R.,(1999),On the Association between Voluntary Disclosure and Earnings Management,Journal of Accounting Research 37,57-82.
    36. Kohlberg, L. (1958) The development of modes of thinking and choices in the years from 10 to 16. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.
    37. Kohlberg, L. (1969) Moral education in the school. School Review, 74:1-30.
    38. Kohlberg, L.(1969) Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research.Chicago: Rand McNall
    39. Kohlberg, L (1984) Essays on Moral Development, Vol. Ⅱ: The Psychology of Moral Development. New York: Harper & Row.
    40. Kohlberg, L and Candee, D. (1984) The Relation of Moral Judgment to Moral Action In W. Kurtines and J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development. New York: Wiley.
    41. Kohlberg, L (1985) A just community approach to mroal education in theory and practice. In M.Berkowitz and F. Oser(Eds.),Moral Education: Theory and Pratice.Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    42. Kohlberg, L with DeVries, R., Fein, G., Hart, D., Mayer, R., Noam, G.., Snarey, J.,and Wertsch, J.(1987)Child Psychology and Childhood Education: A Cognitive Developmental View. New York: Longman.
    43. Kujala, J., (2001). A Multidimensional Approach to Finnish Managers’ Moral Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 3/4, 231-254.
    44. Laczniak, G. R. and Inderrieden, E. J. ,(1987), The Influence of Stated Organizational Concern upon Ethical Decision Making,Journal of Business Ethics (6), 297-307.
    45. Levuitt,A.,Jr.,(1998),The Number Game,The CPA Journal 68,14-19.
    46. Loe T. W., Ferrel, L. and Mansfield, P. ,(2000), A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business, Journal of Business Ethics, (25), 185-204
    47. Marshall, B. and Dewe, P. ,(1997), AnInvestigation of the Components of MoralIntensity, Journal of Business Ethics (16), 521-590.
    48. McMahon,J.M. and R.J. Harvey(2006).An Analysis of the Factor Structure of Jones’ Moral Intensity Construct.Journal of Business Ethics 64,381–404
    49. Merchant,K.A.,(1989), Rewarding Results:Motivating profit Center Manaders,Harvard Business School Press,Boston,MA
    50. Merchant,K.A (1990), The Effect of Financial Controls on Data Manipulation and Management Myopia,Accounting Organizations and Society 15,297-313.
    51.. Morris, S. A. & McDonald, R. A., (1995). The role of moral intensity in moraljudgments: an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 9, 715-726.
    52. Murphy, P. E. and Laczniak, G. R. ,(1981),Marketing Ethics: A Review withImplications for Managers, Educators,and Researchers,Review of Marketing,Chicago: American Marketing Association, 251-266.
    53. Philip Dewe(1997). An Investigation of the Components of Moral Intensity. Journal of Business Ethics 16: 521–529, 1997.
    54.. Rest, J. R. ,(1986),Moral Development: Advancesin research and Theory, Praeger, New York, 29.
    55. Robin, D. P., (1980). Value Issues in Marketing, in Theoretical Developments in Marketing. American Marketing Association. Chicago.
    56. Schipper,K.(1989),Commentary on Earnings Management,Accounting Horizons 3,91-102.
    57. Schwepker, C. H., & Good, D. J., (1999). The impact of sales quotas on moral judgment in the financial services industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 13, 1,38-58.
    58. Singer, M. S.,(1996), The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgements of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public, Journal of Business Ethics 15(4), 469–474.
    59. Singer, M. S.and A. E. Singer,(1997), Observer Judgements about Moral Agents’ Ethical Decisions:The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity,Journal of Business Ethics 16(5), 473–484.
    60. Singer, M. S. (1998), “The role of subjective concerns and characteristics of the moral issue in moral considerations,” British Journal of Psychology (89), 663-679
    61. Singer, M. S.and Turner, J.“Consideration of moral intensity in ethical judgment: Its relationship with whistle-blowing and need-for-cognition,” Journal of Business Ethics(17:5), Apr 1998, pp. 527-541.
    62. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J, and Kraft, K.L. ,(1996), Moral intensity and ethicaldecision-making of marketingprofessionals,Journal of Business Research (36), 245-255.
    63. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J & Franke, G.. R.,(1999). Antecedents, consequences,and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 1, 19-35.
    64. Taylor, P. W., (1975). Principles of Ethics: An Introduction. Dickenson Publishing Company,Inc.
    65. Terry W. Loe and Linda Ferrell(2000).A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business.Journal of Business Ethics 25: 185–204.
    66. Thong, J. Y. and Yap, C. ,(1998), Testing an Ethical Decision-Making Theory: The Case of Softlifting, Journal of Management Information Systems (15:1), 213-237.
    67. Trevino, L. K.,(1986),Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model, Academy of Management Review, Vol 11, No 3,
    68. Trevino, L. K and S. A. Youngblood,(1990), 'Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior', Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 378-385.
    69. Trevino, L. K and B. Victor,(1992), 'Peer Reporting of Unethical Behavior: A Social Context Perspective', Academy of Management Journal 35,38-64.
    70. Tsalikis, J., & Fritizsche, D. J., (1989). Business Ethics: A Literature Review with a Focus on Marketing Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 9, 695- 743.
    71. Vitell, S. J., (1986). Marketing Ethics: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations of a Positive Theory of Decision Making in Marketing Decision Having Ethical Content. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas Tech University.
    72. Vitell, S. J. and Davis, D. L., (1990), Ethical Beliefs of MIS Professionals: The Frequency and Opportunity for Unethical Behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 9, 63-70.
    73. Wotruba, T. R.,﹙1990﹚,A comprehensive framework for the analysis of ethical behavior, with a focus on sales, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 10,.29-42.
    74. Weber, J.(1990) "Managers' Moral Reasoning: Assessing their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas," Human Relations (43), pp. 687-702.
    75. Weber, J.(1990) 'Managers' Moral Reasoning:Assessing Their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas', Human Relations 43, 687-702.
    76. Weber, J.(1993) ,Assessing the Role of the Moral Issue and its Intensity upon Managerial Decision Making, International Association for Business and Society Proceedings, 390-394.
    77. Weber, J(1996 )“Influences upon Managerial Moral decision Making: Nature of the Harm and Magnitude of Consequences,” Human Relations (49:1), 1-22.

    下載圖示 校內:2009-07-01公開
    校外:2012-07-01公開
    QR CODE