近年，時間觀議題逐漸受到組織行為研究重視，已有一些研究成果。然而，多數研究聚焦於個體對於特定時間點的認知與情感反應，忽略整體時間軸的情緒感受。特別是，當個體感知其生命時間軸達到平衡狀態，有助於應對環境變化並預測諸多重要的生活結果。這樣的特性亦可能影響員工效能，卻尚未有研究著墨。因此，本研究透過兩個子研究，揭示平衡時間觀在職場的重要意涵。研究一驗證Zimbardo時間觀量表（ZTPI）在台灣職場的適用性。首先，透過60位大學生的向度歸類，剔除量表中語意不適切的試題，修訂為17題的中文化短版量表。隨後，以224位台灣私營企業員工的問卷資料進行因素分析與效標檢驗，結果顯示修訂後的量表仍維持五向度，並具有良好的信效度。研究二探究平衡時間觀在職場中的前因後果與中庸思維視的調節效果。分析181筆台灣私營企業員工的兩階段問卷資料，結果顯示：（1）內外控性格與平衡時間觀顯著關聯；（2）平衡時間觀顯著預測員工幸福感（文化客位與文化主位）；（3）平衡時間觀中介內外控性格與員工幸福感間的關係；（4）中庸思維強化平衡時間觀與文化客位之員工幸福感間的正向關聯，並形成調節式中介模型。整體而言，本研究突顯了生命時間軸在華人職場中的重要性，以及平衡時間觀在華人文化中的根深蒂固性。最後，根據本研究結果，建議實務界將時間觀介入方案納入人力資源管理策略，以協助員工適應職場環境。

Recent organizational behavior research has increasingly focused on time perspective (TP), yet the emotional perception of the overall timeline remains understudied. Specifically, when individuals perceive their life timeline as balanced, it aids in adapting to environmental changes and predicting important life outcomes, potentially influencing employee effectiveness, an area previously unexplored in research. This study, through two investigations, reveals the significant implications of balanced time perspective (BTP) in the workplace. Study 1 validates the applicability of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory in Taiwanese workplaces. Through dimension classification by 60 university students, inappropriate items are eliminated, resulting in a 17-item Chinese short version. Subsequently, factor analysis and criterion validation are conducted using questionnaire data from 224 Taiwanese employees, demonstrating that the revised scale maintains five dimensions with good reliability and validity. Study 2 explores the antecedent and consequence of BTP in the workplace, as well as the moderating effect of Zhong-Yong thinking. Analysis of two-stage questionnaire data from 181 Taiwanese employees reveals: (1) a significant association between locus of control (LOC) and BTP; (2) BTP significantly predicts employee well-being (EWB; both etic and emic); (3) BTP mediates the relationship between LOC and EWB; (4) Zhong-Yong thinking strengthens the positive relationship between BTP and etic EWB, forming a moderated mediation model. Overall, this study highlights the importance of life timeline in Chinese workplaces and the deep-rooted nature of BTP in Chinese culture. Based on these findings, it is recommended that practitioners incorporate time perspective intervention programs into human resource management strategies to assist employees in enhancing effectiveness.

余思賢、林以正、黃金蘭、黃光國、張仁和（2010）。長期取向思維與心理適應之關聯。中華心理衛生學刊，23，347-375。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.201009_23(3).0001 [Yu, S.-H., Lin, Y.-C., Huang, C.-L., Huang, K.-K., Chang, J.-H. (2010). The relationship between long-term orientation and psychological adjustment. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 23, 347-375.]
李子萱、王曉剛、畢重增（2019）。什麼樣的人偏愛中庸思維？—社會認知基本維度框架的初步描述。心理技術與應用（中國），7(1)，17-22。https://doi.org/10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2019.01.003 [Li, Z.-X., Wang, X.-G., Bi, C.Z. (2019). What kind of person prefers zhongyong thinking?—a preliminary description in the fundamental dimensions of social cognition. Techniques and Application (China), 7(1): 17-22.]
李新民、陳密桃（2006）。實用智能、緣分信念與心理健康、工作表現之相關：以幼兒教師為例。中華心理學刊，48(2)，183-202。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2006.4802.05 [Li, H.M., Chen, M.-T. (2006). The relationship among practical intelligence, yuarn-feng beliefs, mental health and job performance for the preschool teachers. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 183-202.]
林文政、許嘉珉、李秉懿（2022）。中高齡職涯未來時間觀、職場成功老化和就業力之關係－探討工作要求與資源的調節式中介作用 。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，10(3)，163-189。https://doi.org/10.6283/JOCSG.202209_10(3).163 [Lin, W.-J., Hsu, C.-M., Li, P.-I. (2022). A study on aging employees' employability: Moderated mediation effects of perceiving job demands and job resources for older workers. Journal of Gerontechnology and Service Management, 10(3), 163-189.]
林姿葶（2015-2018）。團隊協時歷程探討：成員時間觀特性與團隊效能（計畫編號：MOST104-2410-H004-053-MY3）[補助]。國科會。[Lin, T.-T. (2015-2018). Entrainment Process in Team: Temporal Perspective Characteristics and Team Effectiveness (Project No. MOST104-2410-H004-053-MY3) [Grant]. National Science and Technology Council.]
林姿葶（2021）。一心多用抑或一心一意：組織中的多工時間觀研究回顧。人力資源管理學報，21(2)，1-31。https://doi.org/10.6147/JHRM.202112_21(2).0001. Airiti Library [Lin, T.-T. (2021). Multiple track mind or one track mind: A review of research on polychronicity in organizational context. Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(2), 1-31.]
林姿葶、姜定宇、蕭景鴻、鄭伯壎（2014）。家長式領導效能：後設分析研究。本土心理學研究，42，181-249。https://doi.org/10.6254/2014.42.181 [Lin, T.-T., Jiang, D.-Y., Hsiao, J.-H., Cheng, B.-S. (2014). Paternalistic leadership and subordinates' effectiveness: A meta-analytic study. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 42, 181-249.]
林姿葶、廖元希、黃雅娟、楊建銘（2023）。魚與熊掌必然不可兼得？多工時間觀對工作壓力、工作生活平衡、身心健康間耗損關係的緩減效果。中華心理衛生學刊，36(2)，121-156。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.202306_36(2).0001 [Lin, T.-T., Liao, Y.-H., Huang, Y.-C., Yang, C.-M. (2023). The buffering effect of polychronicity on the effects of job stress on work-life balance and indicators of physical and mental health. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 36(2), 121-156.]
林姿葶、鄭伯壎（2013）。組織中的時間與時間觀：回顧與展望。本土心理學研究，40，143-195。https://doi.org/10.6254/2013.40.143 [Lin, T.-T., Cheng, B.-S. (2013). Time and temporal perspective in organizations: A literature review and future research directions. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 40, 141-195.]
林美蘭、王思峯（2019）。時間觀視角之國中青少年敘說認同介入質性研究。輔仁社會研究，9，53-107。[Lin, M.-L., Wang, S.-F. (2019). A qualitative research on narrative identity intervention for adolescent in middle school: A time perspective. Fu Jen Social Studies, 9, 53-107]
林偉芳、黃金蘭、林以正（2015）。中庸與轉念：以字詞分析體現中庸思維之情緒調節動態歷程。本土心理學，44，119-150。https://doi.org/10.6254/2015.44.119 [Lin, W.-F., Huang, C.-L., Lin, Y.-C. (2015). A lingiuistic analysis of the impact of zhong yong thinking on emotion regulation. Indigenous Psychological Rsearch in Chinese Societies, 44, 119–150.]
林瑋芳、黃金蘭、林以正（2014）。來得好不如來得巧：中庸與陰陽轉折的時機。載於楊中芳、韋慶旺（主編），中庸心理學研究—I，中國社會心理學評論（中國），7，89-107。[Lin, W.-F., Huang, C.-L., Lin, Y.-C. (2014). Timing makes a difference! An interaction effect between Zhong-Yong belief/value and Yin-Yang convertibility belief on psychological well-being. In Yang, C.-Y., Wei, C.-W. (Eds), Zhong-Yong Psychological studies-I, Chinese Social Psychological Review (China), 7, 89-107.]
周麗芳（2015-2018）。邁向圓滿---台灣職場健康心理學的實踐(子計畫七)華人職場中的員工幸福感：本土文化取徑的研究與介入（計畫編號：MOST104-2420-H006-010-MY3）[補助]。國科會。[Chou, L.-F. (2015-2018). Employee’s well-being in Chinese workplace: The research and intervention of indigenous cultural approach (Project No. MOST104-2420-H006-010-MY3) [Grant]. National Science and Technology Council.]
周麗芳（2020-2022）。家長式領導的再深化與理解 ：權力基礎與社會網絡的整合探討（計畫編號：NSTC 109-2410-H-006 -037 -MY2）[補助]。國科會。[Chou, L.-F. (2018). Deepening and understanding of paternalistic leadership: Integrated research of power source and social network perspective (Project No. NSTC 109-2410-H-006 -037 -MY2) [Grant]. National Science and Technology Council.]
孫蒨如（2014）。陰陽思維與極端判斷：陰陽思維動態本質的初探。載於楊中芳、韋慶旺（主編），中庸心理學研究—I，中國社會心理學評論（中國），7，108-130。[Sun, C.-R. (1997). Yin-Yang dynamic thinking; Zhong-Yong belief/value; extremity judgments. In Yang, C.-Y., Wei, C.-W. (Eds), Zhong-Yong Psychological studies-I, Chinese Social Psychological Review (China), 7, 108-130]
徐欣萍（2012）。華人關係互動中的緣分運作及其心理適應歷程。本土心理學研究，37，57-97。https://doi.org/10.6254/2012.37.57 [Hsu, H.-P. (2012). The operation and coping process of yuanfen in Chinese guanxi interaction. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 37, 57–97.]
康正男、陳亮君、黃渼茜、林姿葶（2023）。運動場館業員工多工時間觀對顧客不文明行為負向影響之緩衝效果。體育學報56(3)，353-373。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202309_56(3).0008 [Kang, C.-N., Chen, L.-C., Huang, M.-C., Lin, T.-T. (2023). The buffering effect of polychronicity on the negative effects of customer incivility in sports stadium. Physical Education Journal, 56(3), 353-373.]
許珈綺（2023）。新進員工組織未來時間觀之前因與後果驗證：心理所有權觀點之解釋 [未出版之碩士論文]。國立台灣大學心理學系。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202301536 [Hsu, C.-C. (2023). The antecedents and consequences of newcomers’ organizational future time perspective: An explanation from psychological ownership theory [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. National Taiwan University Department of Psychology.]
費孝通（1984）。鄉土中國。上海：觀察社。[Fei, X.-T. (1984). Xiang-Tu Zhong-Guo. Shanghai: Guan-Cha-She]
黃金蘭、林以正、楊中芳（2012）。中庸信念－價值量表之修訂。本土心理學研究,，38，3-41. https://doi.org/10.6254/2012.38.3 [Huang, C.-L., Lin, Y.-C., Yang, C.-F. (2012). Revision of the Zhong-Yong belief-value scale. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 38, 3-41.]
黃金蘭、鍾育君、林以正（2014）。見林或見樹？—整體處理與中庸的關聯性。載於韋慶旺、楊中芳（主編），中庸心理學研究—II，中國社會心理學評論（中國），8，49-65。[Huang, C.-L., Chong, Y.-J., Lin, Y.-C. (2014). Seeing tree or forest? The relationship between global perceptual processing and Zhong-Yong thinking style. In Yang, C.-Y., Wei, C.-W. (Eds), Zhong-Yong Psychological studies-I, Chinese Social Psychological Review (China), 7, 108-130.]
楊中芳（2001）。有關關係與人情構念化之綜述。載於楊中芳（主編），中國人的人際關係、情感與信任（頁3–26）。台北：遠流。[Yang, C.-F. (2001). You guan Guan-Xi yu Ren-Qing gou-nian-hua zhi zong-shu. In Yang, C.-Y. (Ed), Zhong-guo-ren de Ren-Ji Guan-Xi, Qing-Gan yu Xin-Ren (pp. 3-26). Taipei: Yuan-Liou.]
楊中芳（2010）。中庸實踐思維體系探研的初步進展。本土心理學研究，34，3-96。https://doi.org/10.6254/2010.34.3 [Yang, C.-F. (2010). Multiplicity of Zhong-Yong studies. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 34, 3-96.]
楊中芳（2022）：中庸心理學研究：起源及現狀。載於楊中芳與張仁和（主編），華人本土心理學30 年：本土研究取徑及理論（頁155-232）。台北：五南圖書。[Yang, C.-F. (2022b). Maybe, we should try to rethink about how to study the Chinese？In Yang, C.-F. & Chang, J.-H. (Eds.), Chinese Indigenous psychology, 30 years after (pp. 155-232). Taipei: Wu-Nan.]
趙志裕（2000）。中庸思維的測量。香港社會科學學報（香港），18，33-55。[Chiu, C. Y. (2000). Assessment of Zhong-Yong thinking: Preliminary findings from across-regional study. Hong Kong Journal of Social Science (Hong Kong), 18, 33-35.]
劉蓉果、朱瑞玲（2020）。臺灣民衆幸福感變動趨勢：世代、年齡及人格的影響。人口學刊，60，43-94。https://doi.org/10.6191/JPS.202006_(60).0002 [Liu, R.-K., Chu, R.-L. (2020). Change in subjective well-being during adulthood in Taiwan: The impact of cohort, age, and personality. Journal of Population Studies , 60, 43-94]
樊景立、鄭伯壎（1997）。華人自評式績效考核的自謙偏差：題意、謙虛價值及自尊之影響。中華心理學刊，39(2)，103-118。[Farh, J.-L., Cheng, B.-S. (1997). Modesty bias in self-ratings in Taiwan: Impact of item wording, modesty value, and self-esteem. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 103-118]
蔡明璋（2024，4月30日）。收入高的人，更快樂的程度是多少？。中央研究院調查研究專題中心， 43。https://survey.sinica.edu.tw/?p=18356&lang=zh [Tasi, M.-C. (2024, April 30). Shou-ru gao de ren, geng kuai-le de cheng-du shi duo shao? Center for Survey Research, Research Center for Humanities and Social Science, Academia Sinica, 43.]
謝廷豪、廖元良、吳崇蘭（2023）。緣分信念歸因對工作績效之影響：自我效能及幸福感的角色探討。教育心理學報，54(4)，807-834。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202306_54(4).0003 [Hsieh, T.-H., Liao, Y.-L., Wu, C.-L. (2023). Influence of Yuanfen attribution on job performance: An exploration of the roles of self-efficacy and well-being, Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 54(4), 807-834]
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.
Akirmak, U., & Ayla, P. (2021). How is time perspective related to burnout and job satisfaction? A conservation of resources perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 181, Article 109667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109667
Akirmak, U., Tuncer, N., Akdogan, M., & Erkat, O. B. (2019). The associations of basic psychological needs and autonomous-related self with time perspective: The cultural and familial antecedents of balanced time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.008
Allen, D. G., Weeks, K. P., & Moffitt, K. R. (2005). Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: The moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 980-990. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.980
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991). Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.732
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social Indicators of Well-Being. New York: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2253-5
Ariely, D., & Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psychological Science, 13(3), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00441
Bal, P. M., de Lange, A. H., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Zacher, H., Oderkerk, F. A., & Otten, S. (2015). Occupational Future Time Perspective Scale [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t46838-000
Ballabrera, Q., & Pérez-Burriel, M. (2023). The role of balanced time perspective mediating the relationship between mindfulness as a trait and life satisfaction in Catalan University students. Current Psychology, 42, 28728–28737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03795-4
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bennett, P., Moore, L., Smith, A., Murphy, S., & Smith, C. (1994). Health locus of control and value for health as predictors of dietary behaviour. Psychology & Health, 10(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449408401935
Bennett, P., Norman, P., Moore, L., Murphy, S., & Tudor-Smith, C. (1997). Health locus of control and value for health in smokers and nonsmokers. Health Psychology, 16(2), 179-182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.16.2.179
Block, R. A. (1990). Models of psychological time. In R. A. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 1–35). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Boniwell, I. (2005). Beyond time management: How the latest research on time perspective and perceived time use can assist clients with time-related concerns. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 3(2), 61–74.
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing Time Perspective in Pursuit of Optimal Functioning. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–178). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939338.ch10
Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903271181
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (pp. 389-444). Allyn and Bacon.
Brookings, J. B., & Wilson, J. F. (1994). Personality and family-environment predictors of self-reported eating attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6302_10
Brosschot, J. F., Gebhardt, W. A., & Godaert, G. L. R. (1994). Internal, powerful others and chance locus of control: Relationships with personality, coping, stress, and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(6), 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90228-3
Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain's default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. In A. Kingstone & M. B. Miller (Eds.), The year in cognitive neuroscience 2008 (pp. 1–38). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011
Byun, H., & Kirsch, D. A. (2017). Organizational Timing Norms: Evidence from Email Time-To-Responses. Academy of Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.17825
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation.
Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 309–336). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Chang, T.-Y., & Yang, C.-T. (2014). Individual differences in Zhong-Yong tendency and processing capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1316.
Chiu, C.-Y., & Yang, C.-F. (1987). Chinese subjects' dilemmas: Humility and cognitive laziness as problems in using rating scales. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 18, 39–50.
Chou, L.-F., Chu, C.-C., Yeh, H.-C., & Chen, J. (2014). Work stress and employee well-being: The critical role of Zhong-Yong. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12055
Coleman, D. F., Irving, G. P., & Cooper, C. L. (1999). Another look at the locus of control–organizational commitment relationship: It depends on the form of commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(6), 995–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199911)20:6<995::AID-JOB955>3.0.CO;2-3
Cooper, B., Eva, N., Zarea Fazlelahi, F., Newman, A., Lee, A., & Obschonka, M. (2020). Addressing common method variance and endogeneity in vocational behavior research: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 121, 103472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103472
Cunningham, K. F., Zhang, J. W., & Howell, R. T. (2015). Time Perspectives and Subjective Well-Being: A Dual-Pathway Framework. Time Perspective Theory: Review, Research, and Application (pp. 403-415). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_26
Diaconu-Gherasim, L. R., Mardari, C. R., & Măirean, C. (2021). The relation between time perspectives and well-being: A meta-analysis on research. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01949-4
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
Dilmaghani, M. (2021). There is a time and a place for work: comparative evaluation of flexible work arrangements in Canada. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 167-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-12-2019-0555
Dondi, M., Klier, J., Panier, F., & Schubert, J. (2021, June 25). Defining the skills citizens will need in the future world of work. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/defining-the-skills-citizens-will-need-in-the-future-world-of-work
Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X07086304
Epel, E. S., Bandura, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Escaping homelessness: The influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(3), 575–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01402.x
Eslami, A., Kanai, A., & Matsumoto, M. (2023). The moderating role of time perspective profiles in the association of workaholism, work engagement and perfectionism among Japanese employees. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 16(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-05-2022-0079
Fischer, R., & Boer, D. (2015). Motivational basis of personality traits: A meta-analysis of value-personality correlations. Journal of Personality, 83(5), 491-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12125
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Freud, A. (1946). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. International Universities Press.
Ganster, D. C., & Fusilier, M. R. (1989). Control in the workplace. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology 1989 (pp. 235–280). John Wiley & Sons.
Germano, G., & Brenlla, M. E. (2021). Effects of time perspective and self-control on psychological distress: A cross-sectional study in an Argentinian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110512
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305
Gupta, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2020). Future time perspective and group performance among students: Role of student engagement and group cohesion. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(5), 1265-1280. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2019-0128
Gupta, R., Hershey, D. A., & Gaur, J. (2012). Time perspective and procrastination in the workplace: An empirical investigation. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 31(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-012-9136-3
Hai, S., & Park, I. J. (2023). How and when does the career future time perspective motivate service performance? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 35(6), 1193–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2023.2266678
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). England: Pearson Prentice.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Harnett, N. G., Wheelock, M. D., Wood, K. H., Ladnier, J. C., Mrug, S., & Knight, D. C. (2015). Affective state and locus of control modulate the neural response to threat. NeuroImage, 121, 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.034
Hayes, A. F., & Rockwood, N. J. (2020). Conditional process analysis: Concepts, computation, and advances in the modeling of the contingencies of mechanisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(1), 19–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219859633
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.561
Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The Analysis of Covariance Structures: Goodness-of-Fit Indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124183011003003
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and Organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill Professional.
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01316
Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hung, C., & Hsu, K. T. (2011). Impact of Locus of Control, Changes in Work Load and Career Prospects on Organisational Commitment of Employees of Life Insurance Companies during Merger and Acquisition. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 7542-7556. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.610
Jain, M., & Singh, S. (2015). Locus of control and its relationship with mental health and adjustment among adolescent females. Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour, 20(1), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-8990.164803
Jankowski, K. S., Zajenkowski, M., & Stolarski, M. (2020). What are the optimal levels of time perspectives? Deviation from the Balanced Time Perspective-Revisited (DBTP-r). Psychologica Belgica, 60(1), 164-183. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.487
Johnson, S., Robertson, I., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2018). Productivity and happiness at work (2nd ed.). Well-being series. Routledge.
Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100511
Kairys, A., & Liniauskaite, A. (2015). Time perspective and personality. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time Perspective Theory: Review, Research, and Application (pp. 115-136). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_6
Khumalo, T., & Plattner, I. E. (2019). The relationship between locus of control and depression: A cross-sectional survey with university students in Botswana. South African Journal of Psychiatry, 25, 1221. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v25i0.1221
Kim, J., Hong, H., Lee, J., & Hyun, M. (2017). Effects of time perspective and self-control on procrastination and Internet addiction. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(2), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.017
King, R. B. (2016). Does your approach to time matter for your learning? The role of time perspectives on engagement and achievement. Educational Psychology, 36(7), 1261–1281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1045835
Koh, H. P., Scully, G., & Woodliff, D. R. (2018). Can anticipating time pressure reduce the likelihood of unethical behaviour occurring? Journal of Business Ethics, 153(1), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3352-y
Kooij, D. T. A. M., Tims, M., & Akkermans, J. (2016). The influence of future time perspective on work engagement and job performance: the role of job crafting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1209489
Košťál, J., Klicperová-Baker, M., Lukavská, K., & Lukavský, J. (2016). Short version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI–short) with and without the Future-Negative scale, verified on nationally representative samples. Time & Society, 25(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15577254
Kren, L. (1992). The moderating effects of locus of control on performance incentives and participation. Human Relations, 45(9), 991–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500906
Kuan, T. Y. J., & Zhang, L. F. (2022). Educating students about time perspective and its effect on subjective well-being. Educational Psychology, 42(5), 644–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2060496
Kuan, T.-Y. J. (2023). Time perspective optimization promotes reflection and collaboration. PsyCh Journal, 12(4), 540-542. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.643
Lee, H. (2013). Locus of control, socialization, and organizational identification. Management Decision, 51(5), 1047-1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2012-0814
Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 1, pp. 15-63). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-443201-7.50006-3
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers (Edited by Dorwin Cartwright.). Harpers.
Lewis, J., & Sauro, J. (2020, June 17). How to convert between five- and seven-point scales. MeasuringU. Retrieved from https://measuringu.com/convert-point-scales/
Loose, T., Robiou Du Pont, L., Acier, D., & El-Baalbaki, G. (2019). Time perspectives mediate the relationship between personality traits and alcohol consumption. Time & Society, 28(3), 1148-1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X18758515
Luk, C. L., & Bond, M. H. (1993). Personality variation and values endorsement in Chinese university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(3), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90312-Q
Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00355.x
Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Fetter, R. (1991). Organizational citizenship behavior and objective productivity as determinants of managerial evaluations of salespersons' performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(1), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90037-T
Marczak, M., Sorokowski, P., & Sobol, M. (2021). Balanced time perspective as a facilitator of immigrants’ psychological adaptation: A study among Ukrainian immigrants in Poland. Transcultural Psychiatry, 58(6), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461520949673
Marko, K. W., & Savickas, M. L. (1998). Effectiveness of a career time perspective intervention. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1996.1566
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1998). The cultural psychology of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198291004
Martin, G. F., Reed, G. E., Collins, R. B., & Dial, C. K. (2002). The road to mentoring: Paved with good intentions. Parameters, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2111
Matthews, G. (2018). Cognitive-adaptive trait theory: A shift in perspective on personality. Journal of Personality, 86(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12319
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51–87). Guilford Press.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A Five-Factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). Guilford Press.
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
Mitchell, J. M., Weinstein, D., Vega, T., & Kayser, A. S. (2018). Dopamine, time perception, and future time perspective. Psychopharmacology, 235(10), 2783–2793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-4971-z
Motaghi Pisheh, M. H. (2011). A study of the relationship between locus of control and job involvement in Iran public employees. African Journal of Business Management, 5(34), 13217-13226. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.1482
Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962). Consulting Psychologists Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/14404-000
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Olivera-Figueroa, L. A., Muro, A., Feliu-Soler, A., Chishima, Y., Jankowski, K. S., Allen, M. T., Servatius, R. J., Unger, A., & Papastamatelou, J. (2023). The role of time perspective and mindfulness on life satisfaction in the United States of America, Spain, Poland and Japan: A cross-cultural study. Current Psychology, 42, 17682–17699. https://doi.org/10.3390/app124817682
Olver, J. M., & Mooradian, T. A. (2003). Personality traits and personal values: A conceptual and empirical integration. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00145-9
Padmanabhan, S. (2021). The impact of locus of control on workplace stress and job satisfaction: A pilot study on private-sector employees. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100026
Page, K. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2009). The 'what', 'why' and 'how' of employee well-being: A new model. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9270-3
Pan, W., & Sun, L.-Y. (2017). A self-regulation model of Zhong Yong thinking and employee adaptive performance. Management and Organization Review, 14(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2017.33
Papastamatelou, J., & Unger, A. (2018). Differences in Burnout Proneness depend on Time Perspective – Evidence from an Occupational Sample of Industrial Employees and MBA-Students. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health, 1, 52-57. https://doi.org/10.26386/obrela.v1i1.8
Parkes, K. R. (1984). Locus of control, cognitive appraisal, and coping in stressful episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 655-668. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.46.3.655
Pelly, D. (2023). Worker well-being and quit intentions: Is measuring job satisfaction enough? Social Indicators Research, 169(1-2), 397–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03166-x
Peng, M. W., Lu, Y., Shenkar, O., & Wang, D. Y. L. (2001). Treasures in the China house: A review of management and organizational research on Greater China. Journal of Business Research, 52(2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00063-6
Peterson, M. F., Smith, P. B., Akande, A., Ayestaran, S., Bochner, S., Callan, V., Jesuino, J. C., D'amorim, M., Francois, P.-H., Hofmann, K., Koopman, P. L., Mortazavi, S., Munene, J., Radford, M., Ropo, A., Savage, G., & Setiadi, B. (1995). Role conflict, ambiguity, and overload: A 21-nation study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/256687
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
Roberts, B. W. (2006). Personality development and organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27001-1
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Prentice-Hall, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10788-000
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 9(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
Schmitt, S., Besteher, B., Gaser, C., & Nenadić, I. (2021). Human time perspective and its structural associations with voxel-based morphometry and gyrification. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 15(5), 2237-2245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-020-00416-1
Schriesheim, C. A., Powers, K. J., Scandura, T. A., Gardiner, C. C., & Lankau, M. J. (1993). Improving construct measurement in management research: Comments and a quantitative approach for assessing the theoretical content adequacy of paper-and-pencil survey-type instruments. Journal of Management, 19(2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(93)90058-U
Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). Achieving sustainable gains in happiness: Change your actions, not your circumstances. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(1), 55-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-0868-8
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
Shute, G. E., Howard, M. M., & Steyaert, J. P. (1984). The relationships among cognitive development, locus of control, and gender. Journal of Research in Personality, 18(3), 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(84)90017-5
Simmers, C. A., & McMurray, A. J. (2022). Navigating work career through locus of control and job satisfaction: The mediation role of work values ethic. Merits, 2(4), 258-269. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits2040018
Sircova, A., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Osin, E., Milfont, T. L., Fieulaine, N., Kislali-Erginbilgic, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2015). Time perspective profiles of cultures. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time perspective theory; Review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo (pp. 169–187). Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_11
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-321. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723
Sobol, M., Sorokowski, P., Misiak, M., Oleszkiewicz, A., & Butovskaya, M. (2024). Only “here and now?” time perspective and helping in Hadza hunter-gatherers. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 18(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000319
Sobol-Kwapinska, M. (2013). Hedonism, fatalism and 'carpe diem’: Profiles of attitudes towards the present time. Time & Society, 22(3), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X13487043
Sormaz, M., Murphy, C., Wang, H. T., Hymers, M., Karapanagiotidis, T., Poerio, G., Margulies, D. S., Jefferies, E., & Smallwood, J. (2018). Default mode network can support the level of detail in experience during active task states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(37), 9318-9323. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721259115
Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00470.x
Spector, P. E. (2002). Employee control and occupational stress. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00185
Stolarski, M., Bitner, J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2011). Time perspective, emotional intelligence and discounting of delayed awards. Time & Society, 20(3), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X11414296
Stolarski, M., Matthews, G., Postek, S., Zimbardo, P. G., & Bitner, J. (2014). How we feel is a matter of time: Relationships between time perspectives and mood. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 15(4), 809–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9450-y
Stolarski, M., Vowinckel, J., Jankowski, K. S., & Zajenkowski, M. (2016). Mind the balance, be contented: Balanced time perspective mediates the relationship between mindfulness and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.039
Tatarkiewicz, W. (1976). Analysis of Happiness. Dordrecht: Springer Dordrecht.
van Beek, W., Berghuis, H., Kerkhof, A., & Beekman, A. (2011). Time perspective, personality and psychopathology: Zimbardo’s time perspective inventory in psychiatry. Time & Society, 20(3), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X10373960
Vowinckel, J., Westerhof, G. J., Bohlmeijer, E., & Webster, J. D. (2015). Flourishing in the now: Initial validation of a present-eudaimonic time perspective scale. Time & Society, 26(2), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X15577277
Wang, S., Tu, Y., Zhao, T., Zhao, T., & Yang, Y. (2022). Focusing on the Past, Present, or Future? Why Proactive Personality Increases Weekly Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23, 1543–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00461-7
Wang, Y., Chen, X., Cui, J., & Liu, L. (2015). Testing the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory in the Chinese context. PsyCh Journal, 4(3), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.103
Webster, J. D. (2011). A new measure of time perspective: Initial psychometric findings for the Balanced Time Perspective Scale (BTPS). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 43(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022801
Weinstein, S. E., & Quigley, K. S. (2006). Locus of control predicts appraisals and cardiovascular reactivity to a novel active coping task. Journal of Personality, 74(3), 911-931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00396.x
Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M., & Yaeger, A. M. (2001). Time perspective and early-onset substance use: A model based on stress–coping theory. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.15.2.118
Wojtkowska, K., Stolarski, M., & Matthews, G. (2021). Time for work: Analyzing the role of time perspectives in work attitudes and behaviors. Current Psychology, 40, 5972–5983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00536-y
Yang, X., Zhang, P., Zhao, J., Zhao, J., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Ding, S., & Zhang, X. (2016). Confucian culture still matters: The benefits of Zhongyong thinking (Doctrine of the Mean) for mental health. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(8), 1097-1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116658260
Yik, M. S. M., & Tang, C. S. (1996). Linking personality and values: The importance of a culturally relevant personality scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(5), 767–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00114-6
Zajenkowski, M., Stolarski, M., Witowska, J., Maciantowicz, O., & Łowicki, P. (2016). Fluid Intelligence as a Mediator of the Relationship between Executive Control and Balanced Time Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1844). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01844
Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996). Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: A review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(2), 145-169. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.1.2.145
Zhang, J. W., & Howell, R. T. (2011). Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits? Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.021
Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Bowerman, T. (2013). Validating a brief measure of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Time & Society, 22(3), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X12441174
Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M. (2013). Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 14(1), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9322-x
Zhou, H., & Yang, Y. (2021). How does employees’ Zhong-Yong thinking improve their innovative behaviours? The moderating role of person–organisation fit. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(4), 803-814. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1925103
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
Zong, M., Dong, D., Yang, Z., & Feng, Y. (2022). Role of time perspectives and self-control on well-being and ill-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multiple mediation model. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00933-2