| 研究生: |
陳憶綺 Chen, Xavier Yi-Chi |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
「我非我」:《奧賽羅》與《哈姆雷特》兩劇裡的情慾、瘋癲、及死亡 “I Am Not What I Am”: Sexuality, Madness, and Death in Othello and Hamlet |
| 指導教授: |
邱源貴
Chiou, Yuan-Guey |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
文學院 - 外國語文學系 Department of Foreign Languages and Literature |
| 論文出版年: | 2011 |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 180 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 《奧賽羅》 、《哈姆雷特》 、拉崗 、鏡像理論 、情慾 、瘋癲 、死亡 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Othello, Hamlet, Lacan, the Mirror Stage, Sexuality, Madness, Death |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:162 下載:10 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘要
伊阿哥對自我的註解「我非我」揭露了他偽裝在良善外表下的邪惡心性。然而,在《奧賽羅》劇中,他並非唯一一個呈現出多重面像的角色!多數的主要角色都被賦予了和伊阿哥一樣衝突又矛盾的多重形象。本論文即以此為發想,旨在探討在莎士比亞的《奧賽羅》與《哈姆雷特》兩劇中有關情慾、瘋癲、和死亡的呈現。在此兩劇中,莎士比亞運用了「隱晦」這種戲劇手法來描繪他的角色們及其心理微妙的轉折。同樣被歸類為家庭悲劇的兩劇,呈現出每個角色在面臨其矛盾的情慾時,同時顯現出的雙重形象: 其所冀望呈現的形象及其所真正表現出的形象。而對奧賽羅、哈姆雷特與奧菲麗雅而言,這雙重形象所隱含的矛盾情結更迫使他們被疏離於父權主體之外。也因此,瘋癲便成為他們逃離父權壓迫的手段。同時,瘋癲也使他們得以表現出內心的衝突與困境。而對哈姆雷特來說,他更得以自由在假瘋癲與真瘋癲之間來去轉換。然而,對大眾利益而言,瘋癲是危險且不可理解的,因此這三名主角的瘋癲也加深了他們自身的疏離,並使他們更進一步被排除於父權主體之外。最後,當謀殺與陰謀一一被揭露之後,死亡便扮演了其多重的角色: 它是懲罰、贖罪、也是淨化被誣蔑的名聲的手段。在本論文中,拉崗的「鏡像理論」及其與主體建立的關係被用來檢視情慾、瘋癲、與死亡在這兩劇中的呈現。藉由拉崗對主體如何由他者眼中的倒影來建立自我主體的理論,本論文探討的是莎士比亞在運用「隱晦」手法的同時所呈現出的不僅是「我非我」,更包含了「我是我」。而此兩種面像則是莎士比亞更能完整描繪每個角色的「我」的關鍵。
Abstract
Iago’s notion “I am not what I am” discloses his villainy masked by his pretended good image. Nevertheless, he is not the only character who contains such diverse images in Othello. Most characters are also endowed with such conflicted images so that they are opaque, difficult to understand. This dissertation aims to discuss the presentation of sexuality, madness, and death in Shakespeare’s Othello and Hamlet through the notion of opacity. In the two plays, Shakespeare employs the dramatic strategy of opacity to depict his main characters. Similarly labeled as domestic tragedies, Othello and Hamlet demonstrate how characters confront their sexuality, displaying the images they desire to present and the images they actually reveal. The contradictory images for Othello, Hamlet, and Ophelia further impel them to be agonized and alienated. Hence, for these three characters, madness is both the means to escape from the oppression of the dominant patriarchal authority and the outlet to present their predicament. Moreover, madness is applied by Hamlet, for instance, to switch between his feigned madness and the chaotic feelings inside. Madness also underlines the alienation of Othello, Hamlet, and Ophelia because their madness is regarded to be dangerous to the public interest. Therefore, despite their original intention of adopting madness as the means to escape from oppression, the three characters end up being further alienated and rejected by their society. Finally, when murder and vicious deeds are disclosed, death serves in the two plays as the resort to punishment, repentance, and purification of tarnished names. Lacan’s theory of the Mirror Stage and the construction of subjectivity are applied to read the contradictory presentation of sexuality, madness, and death in the two plays. By Lacan’s theory of how a subject constructs his own image through the reflection in the eyes of the Other, the dissertation examines Shakespeare’s use of opacity to present not only “what I am not” but also “what I am” in order to depict a totality of the “I.”
Works Cited
Adelman, Janet. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in
Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to The Tempest. New York: Routledge, 1992.
Andrews, Michael C. “Honest Othello: The Handkerchief Once More.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 13.2 (1973): 273-84.
Belsey, Catherine. “Erotic Politics: Desire on the Renaissance Stage.” Desire’s Excess and the English Renaissance Theatre—Edward II, Troilus and Cressida, Othello. Ed. Susan Zimmerman. New York: Routledge, 1992. 84-102.
---. Shakespeare and the Loss of Eden: The Construction of Family Values in Early Modern Culture. London: Macmillan, 1999.
Berger, Harry Jr. “Impertinent Trifling: Desdemona’s Handkerchief.” Shakespeare Quarterly 47.3 (1996): 235-50.
Berry, Edward. “Othello’s Alienation.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 30.2 (1990): 315-33.
Blincoe, Noel. “Is Gertrude an Adulteress?” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes, and Reviews 10.4 (1997): 18-24.
Bloom, Harold. Introduction. William Shakespeare’s Othello. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea, 1987. 1-5.
Calderwood, James L. “Speech and Self in Othello.” Shakespeare Quarterly 38.3 (1987): 293-303.
---. The Properties of Othello. Amherst: The U of Massachusetts P, 1989.
Callaghan, Dympna. Woman and Gender in Renaissance Tragedy: A Study of King Lear, Othello, the Duchess of Malfi and the White Devil. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities, 1989.
Camden, Carrol. “On Ophelia’s Madness.” Shakespeare Quarterly 15.2 (1964): 247-55.
Campbell, Lily B. Shakespeare’s Tragic Heroes: Slaves of Passion. Gloucester:
Peter Smith, 1973.
Charney, Maurice and Hanna Charney. “The Language of Madwomen in Shakespeare and His Fellow Dramatists.” Signs 3.2 (1977): 451-60.
Clemen, Wolfgang. The Development of Shakespeare’s Imagery. London: Methuen, 1977.
Cressy, David. “Gender Trouble and Cross-Dressing in Early Modern England.” The Journal of British Studies 35.4 (1996):438-65.
Crompton, Louis. Homosexuality and Civilization. Cambridge: Belknap, 2003
Daileader, Celia R. Eroticism on the Renaissance Stage: Transcendence, Desire, and the Limits of the Visible. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998.
Edgecombe, Rodney Stenning. “Notes on ‘Put out the Light’ in Othello 5.2.” ANQ 21.3 (2008): 8-11.
Erlich, Avi. Hamlet’s Absent Father. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1977.
Evans, Dylan. An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge, 1996.
Farrell, Kirby. Play, Death, and Heroism in Shakespeare. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1989.
Feder, Lillian. Madness in Literature. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1980.
Findlay, L. M. “Enriching Echoes: Hamlet and Orpheus.” MLH 93.5 (Dec 1978): 982-89.
Foakes, R. A. Shakespeare and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003.
Freud, Sigmund. On Sexuality: Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality and Other Works. Trans. James Strachey. London: Penguin, 1987.
---. The Interpretation of Dreams. Trans. Joyce Crick. New York: Oxford, 1999.
Gohlke, Madelon. “‘I Wooed Thee with My Sword’: Shakespeare’s Tragic Paradigms.” The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare. Eds. Gayle Greene, Carol Thomas Neely, and Carolyn Ruth Swift Lenz. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1983. 150-70.
Goodland, Katharine. Female Mourning in Medieval and Renaissance English Drama: from The Raising of Lazarus to King Lear. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.
Greenblatt, Stephen. "The Improvisation of Power." William Shakespeare's Othello. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House P, 1987. 37-59.
---. Will in the Word: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. New York: Norton, 2004.
Grennan, Eamon. “The Women’s Voices in Othello: Speech, Song, Silence.” Shakespeare Quarterly 38.3 (1987): 275-92.
Hall, Michael. The Structure of Love: Representational Patterns and Shakespeare’s Love Tragedies. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1989.
Hallstead, R. N. “Idolatrous Love: A New Approach to Othello.” Shakespeare Quarterly 19.2 (1968): 107-24.
Heilbrun, Carolyn G. Hamlet’s Mother and Other Women. New York: Columbia UP, 1990.
Heilman, Robert, B. Magic in the Web: Action and Language in Othello. Lexington: U of Kentucky P, 1956.
Holland, Norman. “Freud on Shakespeare.” PMLA 75.3 (1960): 163-73.
Jones, Ernest. Hamlet and Oedipus. New York: Norton, 1976.
Jordan, Hoover H. “Dramatic Illusion in Othello.” Shakespeare Quarterly 1.3 (1950):
146-52.
Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Norton, 1977.
---. “Desire and the Interpretation of Desire in Hamlet.” Yale French Studies 55/56 (1997):11-52.
Landau, Aaron. “‘Let Me Not Burst in Ignorance’: Skepticism and Anxiety in Hamlet.” English Studies: A Journal of English language and Literature 82.3 (2001):218-30.
Leverenz, David. “The Woman in Hamlet: An Interpersonal View.” Signs 4.2 (1978): 291-308.
Levy, Eric P. “The Problematic Relation between Reason and Emotion in Hamlet.” Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature 53.2 (2001): 83-95.
Loberg, Harmonie. “Queen Gertrude: Monarch, Mother, Murderer.” Atenea 24.1 (2004): 59-71.
Logan, Sandra. “Domestic Disturbance and the Disordered State in Shakespeare’s Othello.” Textual Practice 18.3 (2004): 351-75.
MacFoul, Tom. Male Friendship in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007.
Mebane, John S. Renaissance Magic and the Return of the Golden Age—the Occult Tradition and Marlowe, Jonson, and Shakespeare. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1989.
Muir Kenneth. Shakespeare’s Sources I: Comedies and Tragedies. London:
Routledge, 2005.
Muller, John P. “Psychosis and Mourning in Lacan’s Hamlet.” New Literary History. 12.1
(1980): 147-65.
Nardo, Anna K. “Hamlet, ‘A Man to Double Business Bound’.” Shakespeare Quarterly 34.2 (1983): 181-99.
Neely, Carol Thomas. “‘Documents in Madness’: Reading Madness and Gender in Shakespeare’s Tragedies and Early Modern Culture.” Shakespeare Quarterly 42.3 (1991): 315-38.
---. “Women and Men in Othello: “What Should such a Fool Do with so Good a Woman?” The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare. Eds. Gayle Greene, Carol Thomas Neely, and Carolyn Ruth Swift Lenz. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1983. 211-39.
Nordlund, Marcus. “Theorising Early Modern Jealousy: A Biocultural Perspective on Shakespeare’s Othello.” Studia Neophilologica 74 (2002): 146-60.
Parker, Patricia. “Othello and Hamlet: Dilation, Spying, and the ‘Secret Place’ of
Women.” Representations 44 (1993): 60-95.
Pyles, Thomas. “Ophelia’s Nothing.” Modern Language Notes 64.5 (1949):322-23.
Ranald, Margaret Loftus. “The Indiscretions of Desdemona.” Shakespeare Quarterly 14.2 (1963): 127-39.
Romanska, Magda. “Ontology and Eroticism: Two Bodies of Ophelia.” Women’s Studies 34 (2005): 485-513.
Salkeld, Duncan. Madness and Drama in the Age of Shakespeare Manchester: Manchester UP, 1993.
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. The Norton Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt. New York: Norton, 1997. 1668-759.
---. The Tragedy of Othello, the Moor of Venice. The Norton Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt. New York: Norton, 1997. 2100-74.
Shapiro, James. Rival Playwrights: Marlowe, Jonson, Shakespeare. New York: Columbia UP, 1991.
Smith, Rebecca. “A Heart Cleft in Twain: The Dilemma of Shakespeare’s Gertrude.” The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare. Eds. Gayle Green, Carol Thomas Neely, and Carolyn Ruth Swift Lenz. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1983. 171-210.
Smith, Shawn. “Love, Pity, and Deception in Othello.” Papers on Language and Literature: A Journal for Scholars and Critics of Language and Literature 44.1 (2008):3-51.
Snyder, Susan. “Beyond Comedy: Othello.” William Shakespeare's Othello. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House P, 1987. 23-36.
Stempel, Daniel. “The Silence of Iago.” PMLA 84.2 (1969): 252-63.
Sterrett, Joseph. “Confessing Claudius: Sovereignty, Fraternity and Isolation at the Heart of Hamlet.” Textual Practice 23.5 (2009): 739-61.
Tiffany, Grace. “Hamlet, Reconciliation, and the Just State.” Renascence 58.2 ( 2005): 111-33.
Toole, William B. III. “‘Iagothello’: Psychological Action and the Theme of Transformation in Othello.” South Atlantic Bulletin 41.2 (1976):71-77.
Traub, Valerie. “Jewels, Statues, and Corpses: Containment of Female Erotic Power.” Shakespeare and Gender. Eds. Orgel Stephen and Sean Keilen. New York: Garland, 1999.
Vanita, Ruth. “‘Proper’ Men and ‘Fallen’ Women: The Unprotectedness of Wives in
Othello.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 34.2 (1994):341-56.
Wagner, Linda Welshimer. “Ophelia: Shakespeare’s Pathetic Plot Device.” Shakespeare Quarterly 14.1 (1963): 94-97.
Weedin Jr, E. K. “Love’s Reason in Othello.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900 15.2 (1975): 293-308.
Wells, Stanley. Shakespeare: The Poet and His Plays. London: Random House, 1997.
Williams, Craig A. Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity. New York: Oxford UP, 1999.
Womack, Peter. English Renaissance Drama. Malden: Blackwell, 2006.
Zimmerman, Susan. “Psychoanalysis and the Corpse.” Shakespeare Studies 33 (2005): 101-08.