簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林柔萱
Lin, Jou-Hsuan
論文名稱: 以知覺創新特性與自我決定理論探討教師對電子化學習平台之意願
A Study of Teachers Willingness of Using an e-Learning – Perspectives from Perceived Characteristics of Innovation and Self-determination Theory
指導教授: 張心馨
Chang, Hsin-Hsin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 119
中文關鍵詞: 電子化學習自我決定理論知覺創新特性
外文關鍵詞: e-Learning, Self-determination Theory, Perceived Characteristics of Innovation
相關次數: 點閱:115下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 電子化學習除輔助傳統教學方法外,更能有效跨越時間與空間限制,成為獲取知識的學習管道之一。過去有許多研究者探討學生使用電子化學習的動機與成效,然而在電子化學習環境中除了學習者之外,授課者的態度與意願也是影響電子化學習使用的關鍵因素。因此,本研究以自我決定理論(包含內在激勵與外在激勵)為基礎,以知覺創新特性、知覺自主性、知覺勝任感、知覺聯繫感、主觀規範與組織政策為前置因子,探討國高中與大學教師再使用或接受電子化學習之意願。研究對象以國高中與大學教師為主,採用紙本與網路問卷,有效樣本388份,並以結構方程模型檢驗研究假設。由資料分析結果,得知內在激勵、外在激勵以及態度對教師使用電子化學習會有正向且顯著的影響。另外,是否使用過電子化學習教師的知覺自主性、知覺勝任感對其內在激勵皆有正向影響,在主觀規範及組織政策對外在激勵也有顯著影響。最後,研究建議學校對使用過電子化學習的教師,應多尊重其教學自主性,並充分授權教師使用電子化學習之教學方式。更可改善電子化學習環境提供更加人性化且方便使用的教學平台,進而提升教師內在激勵之長期使用意願。而對於未使用過電子化學習的教師,必需授權教師自行決定是否參與電子化學習教學方式;也可提供教學優良教師等獎勵或將電子化學習列為教師考績及升等項目,以提升教師參與電子化學習之意願。

    E-learning is not only an auxiliary tool of traditional teaching methods, but it also can cross boundaries of time and space for the purpose of interacting with learners. Learners’ motivation and its outcomes have been studied; however, the attitude of teachers and willingness of acceptance of e-learning are also important elements that affect the use of e-learning. Therefore, this study adopts self-determination theory, including intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation and applies the perceived characteristics of innovation, perceived autonomy, competence, relatedness, subject norm and organizational policy as antecedents to examine teachers’ willingness to reuse or adopt e-learning. The research object is focused on teachers in Taiwan. Paper- and Internet-based questionnaires are used for data collection, and, as a result, 388 questionnaires are found to be valid, and are subsequently analyzed by SEM. The results indicate that intrinsic, extrinsic motivation and attitude have a positive and significant influence on willingness to use e-learning. Further, perceived autonomy and competence have a positive influence on intrinsic motivation, and subject norm and organizational policy also have a positive influence on extrinsic motivation in both the reuse and the adoption model. Finally, this study suggests that schools should respect teachers’ decisions and should fully authorize them to use e-learning. Additionally, an improvement with regard to the accessibility and ease of use of the e-learning platform can facilitate teachers’ intrinsic motivation for continuous use. However, for teachers who have never used e-learning, schools can provide more freedom for the use of e-learning and authorization to design course content using it as a tool. The school also can implement a reward system, such as award of excellence or performance evaluations for the purpose of enhancing teachers’ willingness to use e-learning systems.

    摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 III Contents IV List of Tables VI List of Figures VII Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Research Objectives 5 1.3 Research Procedure 6 Chapter 2 Literature Review and Hypothesis Development 7 2.1 E-learning 7 2.2 Self-Determination Theory 10 2.3 Attitude toward E-learning 15 2.4 Intrinsic Motivation 17 2.4.1 Perceived Autonomy 20 2.4.2 Perceived Competence 22 2.4.3 Perceived Relatedness 23 2.5 Extrinsic Motivation 24 2.5.1 Subject Norm 25 2.5.2 Organizational Policy 27 2.6 Perceived Characteristics of Innovation 28 2.7 Willingness to Reuse/Adopt E-learning 31 Chapter 3 Conceptual Framework and Methodology 34 3.1 Conceptual Framework 34 3.2 Construct Definition and Measurement Development 38 3.2.1 Construct Definition 38 3.2.2 Measurement Development 39 3.3 Pilot test 40 3.4 Data Analysis Method 46 Chapter 4 Data Analysis and Hypotheses Testing 49 4.1 Descriptive Analysis 49 4.1.1 Response Rate 49 4.1.2 Sample Characteristics 50 4.2 Measurement Model Analysis 51 4.2.1 Reliability Analysis 52 4.2.2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis 52 4.2.3 Convergent Validity and Reliability Analysis 60 4.2.4 Discriminant Validity 61 4.3 Structural Equation Modeling Analysis 62 4.4 Additional Analysis 70 4.5 ANOVA and t-Test 78 Chapter 5 Discussion and Implications 86 5.1 Summary of Hypotheses 86 5.2 Discussion and Conclusions 89 5.2.1 Perceived Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness toward Intrinsic Motivation 89 5.2.2 Intrinsic Motivation, Attitude toward E-learning and Willingness to Reuse/Adopt E-learning 90 5.2.3 Subject Norm and Organizational Policy toward Extrinsic Motivation 92 5.2.4 Extrinsic Motivation, Attitude toward E-learning and Willingness to Reuse/Adopt E-learning 92 5.2.5 Perceived Characteristics of Innovation on Attitude toward E-learning 93 5.2.6 Additional Analysis 95 5.2.7 Demographic Variable 96 5.3 Theoretical Implication 98 5.4 Practical implications 100 5.5 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 101 References 103 Appendix 110

    Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., & Day, G. S, (2001). Marketing Research, (7th Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179−211.

    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Al-Gahtani, S. (2003). Computer technology adoption in Saudi Arabia: Correlates of perceived innovation attributes. Information Technology for Development, 10(1), 57-69.

    Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185-201.

    Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967.

    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.

    Bagozzi1, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74-94

    Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 2045–2068.

    Berge, Z. L., Muilenburg, L. Y., & Haneghan, J. V. (2002). Barriers to distance education and training: survey results. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 409–418.

    Chiang, T. H. (2009). The Professional Status of Taiwanese Primary School Teachers: A Historical Analysis. Asian Conference on Education 2009, 24-25, 2009, Osaka, Japan.

    Chiu, C. M., Sun, S. Y., Sun, P. C., & Ju, T. L. (2007). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of web-based learning continuance. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1224–1245.

    Coffin, R., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1999). Motivational influences on computer-related affective states. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 549−569.

    Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C.A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.

    Czerniewicz, L., & Brown, C. (2009). A study of the relationship between institutional policy, organizational culture and e-learning use in four South African universities. Computers & Education, 53(1), 121-131

    Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic.

    Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press

    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘‘what” and ‘‘why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Education Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 325-346.

    Engelbrecht, M. (2005). Adapting to changing expectations: Postgraduate students’ experience of an e-learning tax program. Computers & Education, 45(2), 217–229.

    Eyitayo, O. T. (2005). Experimenting e-learning with a large class. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 1(3), 160-172.

    Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (2002). Lessons learned from implementing the steps to self- determination curriculum. Remedial and Special Education, 23(2), 90-99.

    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981), Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50

    Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199-223.

    Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.

    Govindasamy, T. (2002). Successful implementation of e-learning pedagogical considerations. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 287-299.

    Hair, J, F., William, C. B., Barry, J. B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis (6 ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.

    Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use, Management Science, 40(4), 440-465.

    Haas, S. M., & Senjo, S. R. (2004). Perceptions of effectiveness and the actual use of technology-based methods of instruction: A study of California criminal justice and crime-related faculty. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 15(2), 263–285.

    Heath, T. B., & Gaeth, G. J. (1994). Theory and method in the study of ad and brand attitudes: Toward a systemic model. In E. M. Clark, T. W. Brock & D. W. Stewart (eds.), Attention, Attitude and Affect in Response to Advertising, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Howell, S. L., Saba, F., Lindsay, N. K., & Williams, P. B. (2004). Seven strategies for enabling faculty success in distance education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 33–49.

    Hsu, M. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2004). Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(5), 359–373.

    Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853-868.

    Hsu, M. H., Yen, C. H., Chiu, C. M., & Chang, C. M. (2006). A longitudinal investigation of continued online shopping behavior: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. International Journal Human–Computer Studies, 64(9), 889–904.

    Ho, L. A., & Kuo, T. H. (2010). How can one amplify the effect of e-learning? An examination of high-tech employees’ computer attitude and flow experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 23-31.

    Hong, S., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1819–1834.

    Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and perceived ease-of-use. Information & Management, 35(4), 237–250.

    Kartha, C. P. (2006). Learning business statistics vs. traditional. Business Review, 5(1), 27-33.

    Kelly, T., & Bauer, D. (2004). Managing Intellectual capital via e-learning at Cisco. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Kim, S., Healey, M. K., Goldstein, D., Hasher, L., & Wiprzycka, U. J. (2008). Age differences in choice satisfaction: A positivity effect in decision making. Psychology and aging, 23(1), 33-38.

    Lee, B. C., Yoon, J. O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320–1329.

    Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095-1104.

    Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506-516.

    Lepper, M. R., Greene, D. & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the over justification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129-137.

    Liao, H. L., & Lu, H. P. (2008). The role of experience and innovation characteristics in the adoption and continued use of e-learning websites. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1405-1416.

    Liaw, S. S. (2002). An Internet survey for perceptions of computer and World Wide Web: relationship, prediction, and difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1), 17–35.

    Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066–1080.

    Lin, C. S., Wu, S. & Tsai, R. J. (2005). Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context, Information & Management, 42(5), 683-693.

    Lin, C. B., Young, S. S. C., Chan, T. W., & Chen, Y. H. (2005). Teacher-oriented adaptive web-based environment for supporting practical teaching models: A case study of school for all. Computers & Education, 44(2), 155–172.

    Liu, W. C., Wang. C. K. J., Tan, O. S., Ee, J., & Koh, C. (2009). A self-determination approach to understanding students' motivation in project work. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 139-145.

    Malthotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.

    Markee, N. (1993). The diffusion of innovation in language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13(13), 229-243.

    Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York:
    Harper.

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2010). MIT OpenCourseWare. Retrieved May 03, 2010, from http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/about/about/index.htm.

    McFarland, D., & Hamilton, D. (2006). Factors affecting student performance and satisfaction: Online versus traditional course delivery. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(2), 25−32.

    Meyer, A. D., & Goes, J. B. (1988). Organizational assimilation of innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis. Academic Management Journal, 31(4), 897–923.

    Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context, Information and Management, 38(4), 217-230.

    Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems, 2(3), 192-222.

    Noyes, J., & Garland, K. (2006). Explaining students' attitudes toward books and computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 351−363.

    Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.), NY: Mc Graw-Hill.

    Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222-2229.

    Parker, S. L., Jimmieson, N. L., & Amiot, C. E. (2009). Self-determination as a moderator of demands and control: Implications for employee strain and engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 52-67

    Ramaseshan, B., & Tsao, H. Y. (2007). Moderating effects of the brand concept on the relationship between brand personality and perceived quality. Journal of Brand Management, 14(6), 458-466.

    Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M., & Martinez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696.

    Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1585–1604.

    Rogers, E. M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations (4th eds.). New York: The Free Press.

    Rogers, E. M. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations (5th eds.).
    New York: The Free Press.

    Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y, & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761-774.

    Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(4), 68–78.

    Saadé, R. G., Nebebe, F, & Mak, T. (2009). The role of intrinsic motivation in system adoption: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations, 4(3), 107-126.

    Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90-103.

    Serna, L. A., & Lau-Smith, J. (1995). Learning with purpose: Self-determination skills for students who are at risk for school and community failure. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(2), 142-146.

    Shroff, R. H., Vogel, D., Coombes, J., & Lee, F. (2007). Student e-learning intrinsic motivation: A qualitative analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19(12), 241-260.

    Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30(2), 74-99.

    Sørebø, Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F., & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1177-1187.

    Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2006). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202.

    Synovate (2010). Latest synovate survey shows young Asians are inseparable from their mobiles. Retrieved August 02, 2010, from http://www.synovate.com/news/article /2010/08/latest-synovate-survey-shows-young-asians-are-inseparable-from-their-mobiles.html

    Taiwan, Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education (2009). The statistics number of higher education school in Taiwan, from http://www.edu.tw/index.aspx.

    Taiwan Network Information Center (2010), Internet statistics in Taiwan, from http://statistics.twnic.net.tw/item04.htm.

    Tan, M., & Teo, T. S. H. (2000). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(5), 1-44.

    Tao, Y. H. (2008). Typology of college student perception on institutional e-learning issues – An extension study of a teacher’s typology in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1495-1508.

    Tao, Y. H., & Yeh, C. C. R. (2008). Typology of teacher perception toward distance education issues – A study of college information department teachers in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 50(1), 23-36.

    Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.

    Thompson, R., Higgins, C., & Howell, J. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization, MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125-142.

    Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, J. K. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption–implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-29(1), 28-45.

    Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Tsai, M. J. (2001). Developing an internet attitude scale for high school students. Computers & Education, 37(1), 41–51.

    Van Slyke, C., Lou, H., & Day, J. (2002). The impact of perceived innovation characteristics on intention to use groupware. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(1), 5-12.

    Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

    Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 71-102.

    Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118.

    Ward, J. H. (1963), Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236-244

    Weise, G. (1975). Psychologische Leistungstests, Hogrefe, Germany: Göttingen.

    Wehmeyer, M. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27(1), 302-314

    Wehmeyer, M. L. (1999). A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14 (1), 53-61.

    White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 65(5), 297-333

    Williams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 115–126.

    Wirtz, J., & Bateson, J. E. G. (1999). Consumer satisfaction with services: Integrating the environment perspective in services marketing into the traditional disconfirmation paradigm. Journal of Business Research, 44(1), 55–66.

    Yick, A. G., & Gupta, R. (2002). Chinese cultural dimensions of death, dying and bereavement: Focus group findings. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 9(2), 32-42

    Zanna, M. P., & Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A New Look at an Old Concept, in the Social Psychology of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2020-12-31公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE