簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳冠宗
Wu, Guan-Zong
論文名稱: 以資料視覺化技術進行工程研究機構之影響力評估
Utilizing Data Visualization to Facilitate Benchmarking in Engineering Research Institutions
指導教授: 鄧維光
Teng, Wei-Guang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工程科學系
Department of Engineering Science
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 55
中文關鍵詞: 資料視覺化產學落差學術研究發展產出評估
外文關鍵詞: data visualization, industry-academia gap, academic research development, impact evaluation
相關次數: 點閱:57下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 當前學術研究發展日益蓬勃,產生越來越多具有社會應用價值的成果。政府持續投入大量資源,推動不同機構如中央研究院和大專院校執行各項研究計畫,期望獲得豐富的產出成果,不僅僅在學術領域,還能在社會上實際應用。本研究旨在評估學術界的資源投入與產出,同時考量學術成果對社會應用的效果,並以視覺化方式呈現研究結果。過往對產出的評估資料來源較單一,難以進行全面的影響力評估。因此,我們收集了工程學者的相關資料,包括發表論文、由政府各部會補助執行的計畫情況和歷史新聞資料等,藉由我們建立的方法流程,以多元客觀的方向進行評估,並利用視覺化方式展現結果。透過這樣的評估方法,我們期望能夠深入了解學術界的資源投入效益,客觀評估學術界與社會應用之間的關係,有助於提供學術界的發展方向,為政府和決策者提供有力參考。

    The current academic research and development are flourishing, generating an increasing number of outcomes with practical societal applications. The government continues to invest substantial resources, driving various institutions such as the Academia Sinica and universities to execute diverse research projects. The expectation is to yield rich results not only within the academic realm but also in practical applications within society. This work aims to assesses the allocation and output of resources in academia, concurrently considers the impact of academic achievements on societal applications. The results of this work are present through visualization methods. Evaluate the output is challenging due to a relatively singular data source, making it difficult to conduct a comprehensive impact assessment. Therefore, we collect related data on engineering scholars, include their published papers, projects executed with government department subsidies, and historical news data. Through the methodology we establish in this work, we approach the evaluation in a diverse and objective manner, present the results through visualization techniques. Through this evaluation approach, we aim to gain an in-depth understanding of the cost-effectiveness of resource allocation in academia, objectively assess the relationship between academia and societal applications. This endeavor aims to provide valuable insights for the development of academia and serve as a robust reference for government and decision-makers.

    Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and Overview 1 1.2 Contributions of This Work 3 Chapter 2 Preliminaries 4 2.1 Government Policy Impact on Technological Development 5 2.2 Applications of Technology Scouting Reports 6 2.2.1 Enhancing Technology Scouting Through Bibliometric Analysis 7 2.2.2 Leveraging Ordinal Classification for TRL Multi-Class Classification 9 2.2.3 Visualization of Benchmarking Evaluation 10 2.3 Relationship Between Government Technology Policies and the "Valley of Death" 12 Chapter 3 Proposed Scheme for Benchmarking 15 3.1 Design of Our Proposed Scheme 15 3.1.1 Evaluating Resource Input and Output 17 3.1.2 TRL Evaluation with BERT for Project Document Classification 19 3.1.3 Evaluation of the Gap Between Academia and Industry 22 3.2 Presenting Evaluation Outcomes Through Data Visualization Techniques 25 Chapter 4 Prototyping and Empirical Studies 27 4.1 The Dataset Used in the Study 27 4.2 Evaluating Resource Input and Output 30 4.3 Evaluate Industry-Academia Gap Through our System 35 4.4 Another Output of the Executed Projects 38 4.5 Discussion of the Experimental Results 39 Chapter 5 Conclusions and Future Work 41 Bibliography 43

    [1] A. Rossini “Bridging the technological valley of death” Teknisk Ukeblad, 2019, https://alessandrorossini.org/bridging-the-technological-valley-of-death/
    [2] A. F. d. Paulo, G. S. Porto, “Solar energy technologies and open innovation: A study based on bibliometric and social network analysis” Energy Policy, Volume 108: 228-238, September 2017
    [3] H. Okamuro, J. Nishimura, “Whose business is your project? A comparative study of different subsidy policy schemes for collaborative R&D” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127(85), February 2018
    [4] W. S. Ashton, H.M Marta, N. M. Anid, N. R. Khalili, M. A. Panero, S. McPherson “Pathways to cleaner production in the Americas I: bridging industry-academia gaps in the transition to sustainability” International Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(1), January 2017.
    [5] W. Dolfsma, D. B. Seo, “Government policy and technological innovation—a suggested typology” Technovation, 33: 173-179, July 2013
    [6] TECH NEWS, https://www.techbusinessnews.com.au/the-social-impact-of-technology/
    [7] Y. Song, J. M. Sahut, Z. Zhang, Y. Tian, L. Hikkerova, “The effects of government subsidies on the sustainable innovation of university-industry collaboration” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174: 121233, January 2022.
    [8] R. Rohrbeck, “Technology Scouting – a case study on the Deutsche Telekom Laboratories,” ISPIM-Asia Conference, 14, January 2007
    [9] Q. Hou, G. Mao, L. Zhao, H. Du, J. Zuo, “Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 20(4): 541–555, January 2015
    [10] K. Saikia, M. Vallès, A. Fabregat, R. Saez, D. Boer, “A bibliometric analysis of trends in solar cooling technology,” Solar Energy, 199: 100-114, March 2020
    [11] J. C. Mankins. Palinkas, S. Czaja, K. H. Chu, C. H. Brown, “TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVELS A White Paper,” Office of Space Access and Technology NASA, April 6, 1995
    [12] L. Gaudette, N. Japkowicz, S. Czaja, K. H. Chu, C. H. Brown, “Evaluation Methods for Ordinal Classification,” Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 5549: 207–210, 2009
    [13] M. N. O. Sadiku, A. E. Shadare, S. M. Musa, C. M. Akujuobi “Data Visualization” International Journal of Engineering Research and Advanced Technology, 2(12), December 2016.
    [14] B. Lee, E. K. Choe, P. Isenberg, K. Marriott, J. Stasko, “Reaching Broader Audiences With Data Visualization,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 40(2), March 2020
    [15] P. Ellwood, C. Williams, J. Egan, “Crossing the valley of death: Five underlying innovation processes” Technovation, 109: 102162, January, 2022
    [16] S. J. Bae, H. Lee, “The role of government in fostering collaborative R&D projects: Empirical evidence from South Korea” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151: 119826, February 2020
    [17] M. P. Feldman, M. R. Kelley, “The ex-ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior” Research Policy, 35: 1509-1521, December 2006
    [18] M. Gulbrandsen, J. C. Smeby, “Industry funding and university professors’ research performance” Research Policy, 34: Pages 932-950, August 2005
    [19] D. Meissner, Y. Zhou, B. Fischer, N. Vonortas, W. Dolfsma, D. B. Seo, “A multilayered perspective on entrepreneurial universities: looking into the dynamics of joint university-industry labs” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178: 121573, May 2022
    [20] D. T. Hoang, N. T. Nguyen, V. C. Tran, D. Hwang, “Research collaboration model in academic social networks” Enterprise Information Systems, 13(7), August 2019
    [21] S. M. Ting, “TRL Labeling by BERT Model” National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan, 2020
    [22] J. Devlin, M. W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding” arXiv, (1810)04805, August 2018
    [23] A. Rogers, O. Kovaleva, A. Rumshisky, “A Primer in BERTology: What We Know About How BERT Works,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8, 2020
    [24] A. Rogers, O. Kovaleva, A. Rumshisky, “Not just financial support? Another role of public subsidy in university–industry research collaborations,” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8, May 2020

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE