簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡宗霈
Tsay, Zong-Pei
論文名稱: 以實證型TOD類型學檢視臺北市發展之特徵與表現
A Classification of Positive TOD Typology Based on Characteristics and Performance of Taipei City
指導教授: 鄭皓騰
Cheng, Hao-Teng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系
Department of Urban Planning
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 91
中文關鍵詞: 大眾運輸導向發展臺北捷運TOD類型學節點—區位—設計模型
外文關鍵詞: Transit-Oriented Development (TOD), Taipei MRT, TOD Typology, Node-Place-Design Model
相關次數: 點閱:153下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • TOD大眾運輸導向發展(Transit-Oriented Development, TOD) 作為近代主流之都市空間規劃策略,在都市中不同建成環境而使實施方式有所差異下,過往文獻藉以研究目的假設其分類模式以反映場站地區的異質性,且多數著重於各別場站或特定面向。實證型TOD類型學(TOD Typology)為以運輸網絡之觀點反映都市發展現況的方法,其本質是對具有共同TOD相關特徵的場站進行分類,能夠很好的衡量大眾運輸系統的效能與場站地區發展現況的程度與相互關係,並呈現場站之於整體運輸網絡中的發展定位,因此有助於釐清都市整體運輸場站之TOD表現,其中「節點—區位—設計」修正模型為衡量TOD類型學研究的主要分析方法與分類依據。
    臺北市的捷運系統建置已二十餘年,TOD策略也隨之實施與調整已久,都市空間也已受到捷運系統建置影響甚深,然而尚未有研究探討TOD所形塑之都市整體樣貌,因此本研究希望透過場站地區的發展現況了解臺北市TOD發展之情形。首先建立符合臺北市情境之「節點—區位—設計」修正模型以衡量臺北市捷運場站之發展現況,以呈現所有場站在運輸服務能力、經濟發展程度與建成環境特徵共三面向之TOD表現建立兩種分類模式,接著以二階段集群分析(Two-step Cluster Analysis) 對場站特徵進行分類與辨識,最後對分類模式進行分析與比較。
    根據研究分析結果指出,臺北市捷運場站在兩個分類模式中皆可分為六個TOD類型,在分類上皆以捷運台北車站為最突出者,中山站、松江南京站、南京復興站以及忠孝敦化站做為全市之社會與經濟活動之核心,位於市區大多數的核心型捷運場站同樣具有相當高的TOD表現,在可發展空間方面則相對受限;市區型場站在經濟活動方面普遍不及大眾運輸系統提供之服務量能,然而具備相對充足之發展空間,顯示其具有一定程度之發展潛力;市郊型場站在TOD表現則普遍偏低,經濟活動與運輸服務能力之間的關係與市區型場站相似,其中市區周圍具有較多居住人口的場站普遍具有不錯的機能混合程度,位於都市最外圍的場站雖發展程度極低,但是具有私人機動運具轉乘捷運的良好能力;將本研究建立之TOD類型應用於臺北市政府現行之EOD策略,顯示以學校為主之市有公共用地在核心型場站地區適合做為引導發展的輔助角色,在市區型與市郊型場站地區則適合做為帶動發展之主要角色。總結而言,本研究凸顯臺北市捷運場站地區TOD發展情形的相似與相異程度,並得以根據不同之發展特性提出相應之規劃應用建議。

    Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) has become a mainstream of urban planning strategy in modern times. The previous study usually presumes the classification based on their research purpose in order to reflect the heterogeneity of mass transit station in practice. This study purpose to clarify the circumstances of Taipei’s TOD planning, using the positive TOD typology as a method to accentuate the difference of TOD’s characteristics and performance between every Taipei MRT stations. As a classification to discrimination every type of TOD, Node-Place model and its modified model are mostly used in the previous study, also used in this study to include transit capacity, social and economics, built environment which known as the main aspects of TOD strategy. We establish two classification modes, and then uses the two-step cluster analysis (Two-step Cluster Analysis) to classify and identify the characteristics of the station, and finally analyze and compare the classification modes.
    According to the research and analysis results, it is pointed out that the MRT stations in Taipei City can be divided into six TOD types in both classification modes. Most of the core-type stations located in the urban area having quite high TOD performance but are relatively limited by development space; The economics aspect of urban-type stations are generally inferior to the service capacity provided by the transit capacity, but having a certain degree of development potential; The TOD performance of suburban-type stations is generally low. Applying the TOD type provided in this study to the current Taipei EOD strategy, showing that the public space in the core-type station area is suitable for being assistant of development, while in the urban and suburban station areas is suitable to be the main role in driving development. In conclusion, this study highlights the similarity and dissimilarity of TOD performances in the MRT station area of Taipei City, also proposes corresponding planning and application suggestions according to different development characteristics.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究範疇 4 第三節 研究內容、方法與限制 6 第四節 研究流程 9 第二章 文獻回顧 10 第一節 TOD理念演進與政策運用 10 第二節 TOD類型學 15 第三節 TOD特徵的衡量 21 第三章 研究設計 26 第一節 研究內容與方法 26 第二節 TOD衡量模型與指標建構 31 第三節 TOD類型的建立 42 第四章 實證分析 46 第一節 捷運場站TOD表現衡量結果 46 第二節 捷運場站類型的建構 58 第三節 分析結果討論 79 第四節 分群成果應用於臺北市都市發展策略 81 第五章 結論與建議 83 第一節 研究結論 83 第二節 研究建議 85 參考文獻 86

    白仁德與劉人華(2014)。大眾運輸導向建成環境特性對捷運運量影響之研究-以臺北捷運為實證對象。建築與規劃學報,15,111-127。
    吳雅萱(2013)。捷運站周邊土地混合使用型態之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
    李怡庭(2005)。大眾運輸導向發展策略對捷運站區房地產價格之影響分析(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
    李家儂(2003)。都會區大眾運輸導向發展之規劃模式(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學,新北市.
    李家儂(2006)。交通運輸與土地使用整合規劃之演變~大眾運輸導向發展的都市發展模式。土地問題研究季刊,5(3),70-83。
    李家儂與賴宗裕(2005)。台灣地區大眾運輸導向發展之落實-借鏡美國的實施經驗。臺北市交通安全促進會,20,1-16。
    李家儂與賴宗裕(2007)。臺北都會區大眾運輸導向發展目標體系與策略之建構。地理學報,19-42。
    李家儂與謝翊楷(2016)。以階層線性模式探討TOD規劃效益對土地開發之影響。臺灣土地研究,19,1-38。
    卓易霆(2013)。大眾運輸導向發展觀點下空間特性之研究─以台北市為例(碩士論文)。 國立成功大學,台南市。
    林孟瑤(2011)。捷運場站周邊土地使用變遷與影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市.
    林楨家、吳建彤與方若庭(2011)。建成環境對捷連轉乘運具選擇的影響:臺北捷連南港線之實證研究。運輸計劃季刊,40,335-366。
    林楨家、李家儂、馮正民、羅健文、蔡耀慶、陳志豪、李欣庭、黃運貴、黃新薰、朱珮芸(2011)。都市計畫案綠色運輸衡量指標之研訂。交通部運輸研究所。
    林楨家與施亭伃(2007)。大眾運輸導向發展之建成環境對捷運運量之影響-臺北捷運系統之實證研究。運輸計劃季刊,36,451-476。
    林楨家、馮正民與胡怡鴦(2004)。台北捷運藍線營運前後沿線發展變化之分析。運輸計劃季刊,33,361-389。
    張惟皓與張效通(2015)。以空間型構法則分析都市型態之研究架構。健康與建築雜誌,2,1-9。
    張學聖與林孟瑤(2011)。捷運場站周邊土地使用變遷之初探─以臺北木柵線為例。建築與規劃學報,12(3),199-213。
    許志堅與林育慈(2003)。大眾運輸導向的都市發展目標與策略-以臺北市為例。經濟前瞻,116-121。
    陳柏維與白仁德(2022)。包容式TOD評估指標在地化之研擬與應用。都市與計劃,49(2),119-218。
    陳姿彤(2018)。捷運場站周邊地區步行空間品質之研究-大眾運輸導向之廊帶空間發展的觀點檢視(碩士論文)。中國文化大學,台北市。
    彭建文、吳森田與吳祥華(2007)。不動產有效稅率對房價影響分析-以台北市大同區與內湖區為例。臺灣土地研究,10,49-66。
    楊徨仁(2020)。場站尺度建成環境探討台北捷運運量影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市)
    臺北市政府都市發展局(2019)。「全市大眾運輸導向發展(TOD)地區計畫委託規劃案」總結報告書。
    蔡育新、王大立與劉小蘭(2011)。土地混合使用對住宅價格的影響:解析混合使用、密度與可及性。都市與計劃,38,119-146。
    蔡佳蓉(2004)。本土化TOD都市設計策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
    羅先豪、孔令傑、王博群、李子璋(2022)。公共自行車轉乘捷運架構下之大眾運輸導向發展概念調整。都市與計劃,49(2),181-198。
    Atkinson-Palombo, C., & Kuby, M. J. (2011). The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000–2007. Journal of transport geography, 19(2), 189-199.
    Austin, M., Belzer, D., Benedict, A., Esling, P., Haas, P., Miknaitis, G., . . . Zimbabwe, S. (2010). Performance-based transit-oriented development typology guidebook.
    Belzer, D., & Autler, G. (2002). Transit oriented development: moving from rhetoric to reality: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy Washington, DC.
    Bertolini, L. (1999). Spatial development patterns and public transport: the application of an analytical model in the Netherlands. Planning Practice and Research, 14(2), 199-210.
    Bertolini, L., & Spit, T. (1998). The redevelopment of railway station areas: E & FN Spon.
    Boarnet, M., & Crane, R. (1997). LA story: A reality check for transit-based housing. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(2), 189-204.
    Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream: Princeton architectural press.
    Cervero, R. (1998). The transit metropolis: a global inquiry: Island press.
    Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199-219.
    Cervero, R., & Murakami, J. (2009). Rail and property development in Hong Kong: Experiences and extensions. Urban Studies, 46(10), 2019-2043.
    Chorus, P., & Bertolini, L. (2011). An application of the node place model to explore the spatial development dynamics of station areas in Tokyo. Journal of transport and land use, 4(1), 45-58.
    Crockett, J., & Hounsell, N. (2005). Role of the Travel Factor Convenience in Rail Travel and a Framework for its Assessment. Transport Reviews, 25(5), 535-555.
    Delpirou, A., Doulet, J.-F., & Delaunay, T. (2016). Why research on TOD in China have helped pinpoint key challenges for a better integration between urban and transportation planning? A critical review of the literature. Journal of transport and land use, 10.
    Dittmar, H., & Poticha, S. (2004). Defining transit-oriented development: The new regional building block. The new transit town: Best practices in transit-oriented development, 19-40.
    Evans IV, J., Pratt, R. H., Stryker, A., & Kuzmyak, J. R. (2007). Transit-Oriented Development--Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes.
    Hancock, M. B. (2014). Transit Oriented Denver: transit oriented development strategic plan 2014.
    Higgins, C. D., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2016). A latent class method for classifying and evaluating the performance of station area transit-oriented development in the Toronto region. Journal of transport geography, 52, 61-72.
    Howard, E. (1902). Garden Cities of Tomorrow. In: London.
    Huang, R., Grigolon, A., Madureira, M., & Brussel, M. (2018). Measuring transit-oriented development(TOD) network complementarity based on TOD node typology. Journal of transport and land use, 11(1), 305-324.
    ITDP. (2017). TOD Standard (3rd edition). In: New York.
    Ibraeva, A., Correia, G. H. d. A., Silva, C., & Antunes, A. P. (2020). Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges. In Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice(Vol. 132, pp. 110-130).
    Jenks, M., & Dempsey, N. (2005). Future forms and design for sustainable cities: Routledge.
    Kamruzzaman, M., Baker, D., Washington, S., & Turrell, G. (2014). Advance transit oriented development typology: case study in Brisbane, Australia. Journal of transport geography, 34, 54-70.
    Li, Z., Han, Z., Xin, J., Luo, X., Su, S., & Weng, M. (2019). Transit oriented development among metro station areas in Shanghai, China: Variations, typology, optimization and implications for land use planning. Land use policy, 82, 269-282.
    Lin, J.-J., & Gau, C. (2006). A TOD planning model to review the regulation of allowable development densities around subway stations. Land use policy, 23(3), 353-360.
    Lindau, L. A., Hidalgo, D., & Facchini, D. (2010). Curitiba, the cradle of bus rapid transit. Built Environment, 36(3), 274-282.
    Lyu, G., Bertolini, L., & Pfeffer, K. (2016). Developing a TOD typology for Beijing metro station areas. Journal of transport geography, 55, 40-50.
    Monajem, S., & Nosratian, F. E. (2015). The evaluation of the spatial integration of station areas via the node place model; an application to subway station areas in Tehran. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 40, 14-27.
    Nasri, A., & Zhang, L. (2014). The analysis of transit-oriented development(TOD) in Washington, DC and Baltimore metropolitan areas. Transport policy, 32, 172-179.
    Parker, T., McKeever, M., Arrington, G. B., & Smith-Heimer, J. (2002). Statewide Transit-Oriented Development Study: Factors for Success in California: Final Report.
    Peter Hall, M. T.-J. (2010). Urban and Regional Planning. In(5th Edition ed.). London: Routledge.
    Renne, J., Wells, J., & Voorhees, A. (2005). Transit-Oriented Development: Developing a Strategy to Measure Success. Research Results Digest, 294, National Cooperative Highway Research Program(NCHRP). Transportation Research Board, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
    Renne, J. L. (2009). From transit-adjacent to transit-oriented development. Local Environment, 14(1), 1-15.
    Renne, J. L. (2016). Transit oriented development: making it happen: Routledge.
    Reusser, D. E., Loukopoulos, P., Stauffacher, M., & Scholz, R. W. (2008). Classifying railway stations for sustainable transitions–balancing node and place functions. Journal of transport geography, 16(3), 191-202.
    Schlossberg, M., & Brown, N. (2004). Comparing transit-oriented development sites by walkability indicators. Transportation Research Record, 1887(1), 34-42.
    Singh, Y. J., Fard, P., Zuidgeest, M., Brussel, M., & van Maarseveen, M. (2014). Measuring transit oriented development: a spatial multi criteria assessment approach for the City Region Arnhem and Nijmegen. Journal of transport geography, 35, 130-143.
    Singh, Y. J., Lukman, A., Flacke, J., Zuidgeest, M., & Van Maarseveen, M. (2017). Measuring TOD around transit nodes-Towards TOD policy. Transport policy, 56, 96-111.
    Su, S., Zhang, H., Wang, M., Weng, M., & Kang, M. (2021). Transit-oriented development(TOD) typologies around metro station areas in urban China: A comparative analysis of five typical megacities for planning implications. Journal of transport geography, 90, 102939.
    Terán, F. d. (1964). Revisión de la Ciudad Lineal: Arturo Soria. In Arquitectura(Vol. 72, pp. 3-20).
    Vale, D. S. (2015). Transit-oriented development, integration of land use and transport, and pedestrian accessibility: Combining node-place model with pedestrian shed ratio to evaluate and classify station areas in Lisbon. Journal of transport geography, 45, 70-80.
    Vale, D. S., Viana, C. M., & Pereira, M. (2018). The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon's subway network. Journal of transport geography, 69, 282-293.
    Yang, L., & Song, X. (2021). TOD Typology Based on Urban Renewal: A Classification of Metro Stations for Ningbo City. Urban Rail Transit, 7(3), 240-255.
    Yang, P. P.-J., & Lew, S. H. (2009). An Asian model of TOD: The planning integration in Singapore. Transit-Oriented Development: Making it Happen, edited by C. Curtis, JL Renne, and L. Bertolini, 91-109.
    Zemp, S., Stauffacher, M., Lang, D. J., & Scholz, R. W. (2011). Classifying railway stations for strategic transport and land use planning: Context matters! Journal of transport geography, 19(4), 670-679.
    Zhang, M. (2007). Chinese edition of transit-oriented development. Transportation Research Record, 2038(1), 120-127.
    Zhang, Y., Marshall, S., & Manley, E. (2019). Network criticality and the node-place-design model: Classifying metro station areas in Greater London. Journal of transport geography, 79, 102485.

    下載圖示 校內:2023-06-30公開
    校外:2023-06-30公開
    QR CODE