一般情況下，提出評價模型是最感興趣的研究重點在信息系統。事实上，信息系统的设计需要指定评估模型的应用识别有效的设计战略，而不是预测设计的有效性。该评估是很重要的决策规划移动学习在那里的设计师需要决定的设计，技术是有效的调解学习特别是在移动学习应用程序的利用率。当前生效的评价模型可以是一个合适的根本，发展的经理和设计师的标准在分析设计策略。使用两个移动学习应用 Pleco和Trainchinese作为一个例子, 本研究的目的是为扩展评价模型，提出了设计评估框架，移动学习并通过应用指定的标准检验两个移动学习应用的设计。在信息系统中的域帐户策略设计作为评估動科技輔助語言學習應用(MCDM)在战略信息系统管理问题。关于潜在的多准则的复杂性，本研究采用了集成的多目标决策方法相结合决策试验与评价实验室模型(DEMATEL)和网络分析法(ANP)。在多目标决策分层框架是基于专家访谈（学者信息系统域）和有经验的用户建立動科技輔助語言學習應用(MALL)。验证通过专家后，有五个标准（硬件和软件，用户界面，互动学习，学习个性化和服务支持）和16个子标准（稳定，高速，审美可视化，系统集成，用户友好性，互动性图形用户界面，接口灵活性，与其他学习者互动，与教师互动，学习资料交换，课程定制，教师反馈，反馈学习，学习材料的更新，朋友的帮助，以及在线和离线支持）。两种类型的受访者被邀请的评价，首先设计师或商场的程序员评估DEMATEL问卷，其次为评估ANP问卷有经验的用户。本研究发现，学习和个性化学习的互动是很重要的方面，在商场的设计。因此，设计者应保证这些素质，提供商场的有效设计。此外，理论内涵和实践意义，包括进一步研究在各章的末尾讨论。

Generally, proposing evaluation model is the most interest research focus in information system. In fact, the design of information system requires the application of designated evaluation model for identifying effective design strategy rather than predicting the design effectiveness. The evaluation is important in the decision making for planning the design of mobile learning where designers need to decide which technologies are effective to mediate learning particularly in the utilization of mobile learning application. The current validated evaluation model can be a proper fundamental to develop criteria for manager and designer in analyzing design strategy. Using two mobile learning applications Pleco and Trainchinese as an example, this study aims for extending the evaluation model to propose the design evaluation framework for mobile learning application and examining the design of two mobile learning applications by applying designated criteria. Evaluating design strategy in information system domain accounts as multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems in strategic information system management. Concerning the potential complexity of multiple criteria, this research adopted integrated MCDM approach which combines Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory Model (DEMATEL) and the Analytical Network Process (ANP). The MCDM hierarchical framework is established based on interview with experts (scholars in information system domain) and experienced users of mobile assisted language learning (MALL). After the validation by the experts, there are five criteria (hardware and software, user-interface, learning interaction, learning personalization, and service support) and sixteen sub-criteria (stability, speed, aesthetic visualization, system integration, user friendliness, interactive GUI, interface flexibility, interaction with other learner, interaction with teacher, learning material exchanging, curriculum customization, teacher feedback, learner feedback, learning material update, friend’s help, and online and offline support). Two types of respondents are invited to for the evaluation, firstly the designers or programmers of MALL for evaluating DEMATEL questionnaire, and secondly the experienced user for evaluating the ANP questionnaire. This research finds that learning personalization and learning interaction is important aspect in design of MALL. Therefore, designers should assure these qualities to provide effective design of MALL. Moreover, the theoretical implication and practical implication including further research is discussed at the end of the chapters.

Aboulafia, M. (1991). Philosophy, social theory, and the thought of George Herbert Mead. In M. Aboulafia (Ed.), SUNY series in philosophy of the social sciences. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning - A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 1-10.
Alm, A. (2013). Socially multilingual: An exploration of informal language learning practices through Facebook. Paper presented at the WorldCALL Conference.
Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 129-144). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Andrade, M. S., & Bunker, E. (2009). A model for self-regulated distance language learning. Distance Education, 30(1), 47-61.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). How classroom envrionment and student engagement affect learning in internet-based MBA courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(4), 9-26.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2002). Managing the on-line classroom: A study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based MBA courses. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 3, 203-223.
Ardito, C., Marsico, M. D., Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T., Rossano, V., et al. (2004). Usability of elearning tools. Paper presented at the Working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, Palermo, Italy.
Artut, P. D. (2009). Experimental evaluation of the effects of cooperative learning on kindergarten children's mathematics ability. International Journal of Educational Research, 48, 370-380.
Au, N., Ngai, E. W. T., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2008). Extending the understanding of end user information systems satisfaction formation: An equitable needs fulfillment model approach. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 43-66.
Avison, D., & Fitzgerald, G. (2006). Information system development: Methodologies, techniques, and tools. Maidenhead, UK.: McGraw Hill.
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34-47.
Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530-545.
BenMoussa, C. (2003). Workers on the move: New opportunities through mobile commerce. Paper presented at the IADIS International Conference e-Society.
Berge, Z. L. (2000). Evaluation web-based training programs. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based training (pp. 515-522). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publication.
Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2006). Product customization on the web: An empirical study of factors impacting choiceboard user satisfaction. Information Resources Management Journal, 19(2), 69-81.
Blanton, J. E., Watson, H. J., & Moody, J. (1992). Toward a better understanding of information technology organiation: A comparative case study. MIS Quarterly, 16(4), 531-555.
Blattner, M. M., & Dannenberg, R. B. (1992). Multimedia interface design. New York: ACM Press.
Bolliger, D. U., Supanakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers and Education, 55, 714-722.
Boztepe, S. (2007a). Toward a framework of product development for global markets: A user-value-based approach. Design Studies, 28(5), 613-633.
Boztepe, S. (2007b). User value: Competing theories and models. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 55-63.
Browne, C., & Culligan, B. (2008). Combininng technology and IRT testing to build student knowledge of high frequency vocabulary. The JALT CALL Journal, 4(2), 3-16.
Cagan, J., & Vogel, C. M. (2002). Creating breakthrough products: Innovation from product planning to program approval. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Cantoni, V., Cellario, M., & Porta, M. (2004). Perspectives and challenges in e-learning: Towards natural interaction paradigms. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 15, 333-345.
Chang, T. Y., & Chen, Y. T. (2009). Cooperative learning in e-learning: A peer assessment of student-centered using consistent fuzzy preference. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8342-8349).
Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers and Education, 54, 1222-1232.
Chen, X. B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning and Technologiy, 17(1), 20-36.
Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 10(1), 9-16.
Chiu, Y. J., Chen, H. C., Tzeng, G. H., & Shyu, J. Z. (2006). Marketing strategy based on customer bheaviour for the LCD-TV. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 7(2-3), 143-165.
Chou, J. R., & Hsiao, S. W. (2007). A usability study on human-computer interface for middle-aged learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2040-2063.
Chou, S. W., & Liu, C. H. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a web-based virtual learning environment: A learner control perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 65-76.
Condie, R., & Livingstone, K. (2007). Blending online learning with traditional approaches: Changing practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 337-348.
Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20, 17-41.
Cook, L. S., Bowen, D. E., Chase, R. B., Dasu, S., Stewart, D. M., & Tansik, D. A. (2002). Human issues in service design. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 159-174.
Cukusic, M., Alfirevic, N., Granic, A., & Garaca, Z. (2010). E-learning process management and the e-learning performance: Results of a european empricial study. Computers and Education, 55, 554-565.
Cummins, J. (2000). Academic language learning, transofmative pedagogy, and information technology: Towards a critical balance. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 537-548.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information system success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2002). Information systems success revisited. Paper presented at the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawai.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 9-30.
Denning, P. J. (2013). The profession of IT: Design thinking. 56(12), 29-31
DeRouin, R. E., Fritzsche, B. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Learner control and workplace e-learning: Design, person, and organizational issues. In J. J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (pp. 181-214): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, 49(3), 273-289.
Dewey, J. (1916, 1966). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.
Dewey, J. (1966). How we think. New York: Free Press.
Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D., & Synteta, P. (2002). Virtual learning environments. Paper presented at the 3rd Hellenic Conference "Information and Communication Technology in Education", Rhodes, Grèce.
Dringus, L. P., & Cohen, M. S. (2005). An adaptable heuristic checklist for online courses. Paper presented at the 35th ASEE/IEEE Annual Conference in Frontiers in Education, Indianapolis.
Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2009). Podcasting: An effective tool for honing languege students' prononuncation? Language Learning and Technologiy, 13(3), 66-86.
Duchastel, P. (1986). Intelligent computer assisted instruction systems: The nature of learning control. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(3), 379-393.
EL-Deghaidy, H., & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian instructor education programme. Computers and Education, 51, 988-1006.
Elliot, M. (2002). Blended learning: The magic is in the mix. In A. Rossett (Ed.), The ASTD E-learning Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fang, L. (2007). Perceiving the useful, enjoyable, and effective: A case study of the e-learning experience of tertiary students in Singapore. Educational Media International, 44(3), 237-253.
Faraday, P., & Sutcliffe, A. (1997). Designing effective multimedia presentations. Paper presented at the Computer-Human Interaction (CHI), Atlanta, Georgia.
Fardoun, H., Montero, F., & Jaquero, V. L. (2009). eLearniXML: Towards a model-based approach for the development of e-learning systems considering quality. Advances in Engineering Software, 40, 1297-1305.
Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1974). DEMATEL: Batelle Geneva Research Institute.
Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1976). The DEMATEL observer. Batelle Institute: Geneva Research Center.
Franklin, C. (2007). Factors that influence elementary teachers' use of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 267-293.
Freeze, R. D., Alshare, K. A., Lane, P. L., & Wen, H. J. (2010). IS success model in e-learning context based on students' perceptions. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 173-184.
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Gallarza, M. G., Gil-Saura, I., & Holbrook, M. B. (2011). The value of value: Further excursions on the meaning and role of customer value. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10, 179-191.
Garrison, D. R. (1990). An analysis and evaluation of audio teleconferencing to facilitate education at a distance. The American Journal of Distance Education, 4(3), 13-24.
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
Garrity, E. J., Glassberg, B., Kim, Y. J., Sanders, G. L., & Shin, S. K. (2005). An experimental investigation of web-based information systems success in the context of electronic commerce. Decision Support Systems, 39, 485-503.
Gerlach, J. H., & Kuo, F. Y. (1991). Understanding human-computer interaction for information systems design. MIS Quarterly, 15(4), 527-549.
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19, 207-228.
Graft, F. (2002). Providing security for e-learning. Computers and Graphics, 26, 355-365.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning system: Definition, current trends, future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning. San Fransisco, California: Pfeiffer.
Grint, K. (1989). Accounting for failure: Participation and non-participation in CMC. In R. Mason & A. R. Kay (Eds.), Mindwaeve: Communication, Computers and Distance. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Gromik, N. (2012). Cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case study. Computers and Education, 58(1), 223-230.
Guzdial, M., & Carroll, K. (2002). Exploring the lack of dialogue in computer-supported collaborative learning. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community, Boulder, Colorado.
Hands, D. (2009). Vision and values in design management. Case Postale, Switzerland: AVA Academia.
Harshim, L. M. (1987). Teaching and learning on-line: Issues in computer-mediated graduate courses. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 16(2), 117-135.
Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012). A model for measuring e-learning system success in universities. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10959-10966.
Hayes, D. N. A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from australian classrooms. Computers and Education, 49(2), 385-395.
Haynes, R. M., Pouraghabagher, R., & Seu, A. (1997). Interactive distance education alliance (IDEA): Collaborative model delivers on demand. The Journal: Technological Horizons in Education, 24(8), 60-63.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information system research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.
Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2003). Technology-assisted learning. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(4), 457-464.
Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Leaner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30-42.
Hiltz, S. R. (1986). The virtual classroom: Using computer mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication, 36(2), 95-104.
Hiltz, S. R. (1993). The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Ho, C. L., & Dzeng, R. J. (2010). Construction safety training via e-learning: Learning effectiveness and user satisfaction. Computers and Education, 55, 858-867.
Ho, S. (2002). Evaluating students' participation in on-line discussions. Paper presented at the Australian World Wide Web Conference, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Holsapple, C. W., & Lee-Post, A. (2006). Defining, assessing, and promoting e-learning success: An information systems perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 67-85.
Hong, K. S., Lai, K. W., & Holton, D. (2003). Students' satisfaction and perceived learning with web-based course. Educational Technology and Society, 6(1), 116-124.
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 4, 51-55.
Hsu, C. H., Wang, F. K., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 66, 95-111.
Hsu, C. Y., Chen, K. T., & H., T. G. (2007). FMCDM with fuzzy DEMATEL approach for customers' choice behavior model. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 9(4), 236-246.
Huang, L. L., & Lin, C. C. (2011). EFL learners' reading on mobile phones. The JALT CALL Journal, 8(1), 61-78.
Hui, W., Hu, P. J. J., Clark, T. H. K., Tam, K. Y., & Milton, J. (2008). Technology-assisted learning: A longitudinal field study of knowledge category, learning effectiveness and satisfaction in language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 245-259.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making, methods and applications Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Vol. 186). New York: Springer Verlag.
Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2002). Web-based cases in teaching and learning - The quality of discussions and a stage of perspective taking in asynchrounous communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10(1), 1-21.
Jensen, H. R. (2001). Antecedents and consequences of consumer value assessments: Implications for marketing strategy and future research. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8(3), 299-310.
Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (1999). User evaluation of information systems: By system typology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B Cybernetics, 29(1), 111-116.
Jiang, M., & Ting, E. (1998). Course design, instruction, and students' online behaviors: A study of instructional variables and student perceptions of online learning. San Diego, California: American Educational Research Association.
Johnston, J., Killion, J., & Oomen, J. (2005). Student satisfaction in the virtual classroom. The International Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 3(2), 1-7.
Jonassen, D. H. (1993). Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 33(1), 35-37.
Kahneman, & Tversky. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karsak, E. E., Sozer, S., & Alptekin, S. E. (2002). Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 44(1), 171-190.
Kasavana, M., & Smith, J. (1992). Creating a multi-processor environment through system integration. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 33(4), 57-63.
Kay, J. (2001). Learner control. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 111-127.
Ke, F. (2013). Online interaction arrangements on quality of online interactions performed by diverse learners across disciplines. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 14-22.
Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kember, D., McNaught, C., Chong, F. C. Y., Lam, P., & Cheng, K. F. (2010). Understanding the ways in which design features of educational websites impact upon student learning outcomes in blended learning environments. Computers and Education, 55, 1183-1192.
Kerr, M. S., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. C. (2006). Student characteristics for online learning success. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 91-105.
Kettinger, W. J., & Lee, C. C. (1995). Percieved service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function. Decision Sciences, 25(5/6), 737-765.
Khan, B. H. (2005a). Learning features in an open, flexible, and distributed environment. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 13(2), 137-153.
Khan, B. H. (2005b). Managing e-learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Hershey, London: Information Science Publishing.
Kleindorfer, P. R., Kunreuther, H. C., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Decision scinences: An integrative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koole, M. (Ed.). (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. Athabasca: AU Press.
Koschman, T. (1996). Paradigm shifts and instructional technology: An introduction. In T. Koschman (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and Practice (pp. 1-23). Mahway, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kositanurit, B., Ngwenyama, O., & Osei-Bryson, K. (2006). An exploration of factors that impact individual performance in an ERP environment: An analysis using multiple analytical techniques. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 556-568.
Kotler, P. J. (1972). A generic concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 36, 46-54.
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2000). Management information systems: Organization and technology in the networked enterprise (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall.
Laurel, B. (1990). The art of human-computer interface design. Reading, Massachusetes: Addison-Wesley.
Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25(2), 117-131.
Lee, A. (2000). Systems thinking, design science, and paradigms: Heeding three lessons form the past to resolve three dilemmas in the present to direct a trajectory for future research in the information system field.Unpublished manuscript.
Lee, B. C., Yoon, J. O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learner's acceptance of e-learning in south korea: Theories and results. Computers and Education, 53, 1320-1329.
Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2000). Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers and Operations Research, 27(4), 367-382.
Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers and Education, 54, 506-510.
Lee, S., & Lee, Y. H. K. (1991). Effects of learner-control versus program-control strategies on computer-aided learning of chemistry problems: For acquisition or review? Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 491-498.
Leidner, D. E., & Javernpaa, S. L. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, 19(3), 265-291.
Lepper, M. R. (1985). Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. American Psychologist, 40(1), 1-18.
Lim, H., Lee, S. G., & Kichan, N. (2007). Validating e-learning factors affecting training effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management, 27, 23-35.
Lin, H. F. (2007). Measuring online learning systems success: Applying the updated DeLone and Mclean. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(6), 817-820.
Lin, H. F., & Lee, G. G. (2006). Determinants of success for online communities: An empirical study. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25(6), 479-488.
Liu, J. Y. (2013). Using Facebook for learning writing: EFL students' perceptions and challenges. Paper presented at the 30th International onference on English Teaching and Learning.
Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers and Education, 52, 599-607.
Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact. Computers and Education, 52, 496-508.
Luppicini, R. (2007). Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science, 35, 141-185.
Markus, M. L., Majchrzak, A., & Gasser, L. (2002). A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 179-212.
Martin, B. L., & Briggs, L. J. (1986). The affective and cognitive domains: Integration for instruction and research. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
Mason, R. O. (1978). Measuring information output: A communication systems approach. Information and Management, 1(5), 219-234.
Matarazzo, G., & Sellen, A. (2000). The value of video in work at a distance: Addition or distraction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19(5), 339-348.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of learning and motivation, 41, 85-139.
McGill, T. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2009). A task-technology fit view of learning management system impact. Computers and Education, 52(2), 496-508.
Meade, L. M., & Presley, A. (2002). R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, 59-66.
Merrill, M. D. (1994). Instructional design theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
Miangah, T. M., & Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(1), 309-319.
Milheim, W. D., & Martin, B. L. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(3), 99-105.
Mok, J. C. H. (2012). Facebook and learning: Students' perspectives on a course. Journal of the NUS Teaching Academy, 2(3), 131-143. Retrieved from http://www.nus.edu.sg/teachingacademy/jnusta/v2n3/v2n3p131_MokJ.pdf
Momoh, J. A., & Zhu, J. (2003). Optimal generation scheduling based on AHP/ANP. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B Cybernetics, 33(3), 531-535.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A system view. Wadsworth, California: Belmont.
Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers and Education, 49(3), 581-596.
Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012). Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses. Distance Education, 33(1), 5-30.
Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of information and system quality: An empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 199-235.
Neorman, D. A., & Spohrer, J. C. (1996). Learner centered education. Communications of the Association for the Computing Machinery (ACM), 39(4), 283-290.
O'Dell, T. (2009). Generaltional differences in satisfaction with e-learning environment. University of Houston, Houston, Texas.
O'Loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking technology: Beyond piagetian constructivism toward a socio-cultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 791-820.
Oliver, R. L., & Herrington, J. (2003). Exploring technology-mediated learning from a pedagogical perspective. Interactive Learning Environment, 11(2), 111-126.
Ou Yang, Y. P., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., & Tzeng, G. H. (2008). A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research, 5(3), 160-168.
Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students' evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers and Education, 53, 1285-1296.
Oztekin, A., Kong, Z. J., & Uysal, O. (2010). UseLearn: A novel checklist and usability evaluation method for elearning systems by criticality metric analysis. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40, 455-469.
Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers and Education, 52, 1-12.
Parker, M. A., & Martin, F. (2010). Using virtual classrooms: Student perceptions of features and characteristics in an online and blended course. MERLOT Journal of Online LEarning and Teaching, 6(1), 135-147.
Peranginangin, Y., & Alamsyah, A. (2013). Assessing iTunes U on user experience in higher education using FRAME model. Paper presented at the The Fifth Indonesian International Conference on Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Small Business, Bandung, Indonesia.
Petter, S., DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 236-263.
Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessement of the Delone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information and Management, 46, 159-166.
Piccolli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426.
Pitt, L. F., Watson, R. T., & Kavan, C. B. (1995). Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 173-188.
Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers and Education, 47, 222-244.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design: Behond human-computer interaction. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Reeves, T. C. (1993). Pseudoscinece in computer based instruction: The case of learner control research. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(2), 39-46.
Reeves, T. C., & Harmon, S. W. (1993). Systematic evaluation procedures for instructional hypermedia/multimedia. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Americal Educational Research Association.
Riecken, D. (2003). Personalized views of personalization. Communications of the ACM, 43(8), 27-28.
Ritchie, D., & Hoffman, B. (1997). Incorporting instructional design pricniples with the world wide web. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-Based Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
Rogers, L., & Finlayson, H. (2004). Developing successful pedagogy with information and communications technology: How are science teachers meeting the challenge? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 287-305.
Romiszowski, A. J., & Mason, R. (1996). Computer mediated communication. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
Roschelle, J. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 260-272.
Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rouet, J. F., Levonen, J. J., Dillon, A., & Spiro, R. J. (1996). Hypertest and cognition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedack. Pittsburgh: RWS Publication.
Sabry, K., & Baldwin, L. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 4.
Salmon, G. (2003). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page.
Sandberg, J., Maris, M., & de Geus, K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers and Education, 57, 1134-1347.
Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner contron in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 285-307.
Seddon, P. B., Staples, D. S., Patnayakuni, R., & Bowtell, M. J. (1999). The dimensions of information systems success. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2(20), Article 20.
Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers and Education, 49, 396-413.
Shale, D., & Garrison, D. R. (1990). Introduction. In D. R. Garrison & D. Shale (Eds.), Education at a distance: From issues to practice (pp. 1-6). Melbourne, Florida: Krieger.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, Illionis: University of Illinois Press.
Shee, D. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers and Education, 50, 894-905.
Shih, H. (2008). Using a cognitive-motivation-control view to assess the adoption intention for web-based learning. Computers and Education, 50, 327-337.
Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
Simon, H. A. (1977). The new science of management decision. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5-27.
Soloway, E., Norris, C., Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J. K., & Marx, R. (2001). Devices are ready-at-hand. Communications of the ACM, 44(6), 15-20.
Steinberg, E. R. (1989). Cognition and learner control: A literature review, 1977-1988. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16(4), 117-121.
Stockwell, G. (Ed.). (2013). Tracking learner usage of mobile phones for language learning outside of the classroom. San Marcos, Texas: Calico.
Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning. Retrieved from http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning/
Suh, K., Kim, S., & Lee, J. (1994). End-user's disconfirmed expectations and the success of information systems. Information Resources Management Journal, 7(4), 30-39.
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50, 1183-1202.
Swan, J. E., & Trawick, I. F. (1980). Satisfaction related to predictive vs. expectation. In H. K. Hunt & R. L. Day (Eds.), Refining concepts and measures of consumer satisfaction and complaining behavior (pp. 7-12). Bloomington, Indiana: Department of Marketing, School of Business, Indiana University.
Tamura, M., Nagata, H., & Akazawa, K. (2002). Extraction and systems analysis of factors that prevent safety and security by structural models. Paper presented at the 41st The Society of Instrument and Control Engineers (SICE) Annual Conference, Osaka, Japan.
Tinker, R., & Krajcik, J. (2001). Portable technologies: Science learning in context. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Tseng, M. L., & Lin, Y. H. (2009). Application of fuzzy DEMATEL to develop a cause and effect model of municipal solid waste management in metro manila. Environment Monitoring and Assessment, 158(1-4), 519-533.
Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in E-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multi attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
Ullrich, C., Borau, K., Luo, H., Tan, X., Shen, L., & Shen, R. (2008). Why web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: Principles and prototypes. Paper presented at the The 17th International World Wide Web Conference.
Van Dyke, T. P., Prybutok, V. R., & Kappelman, L. A. (1999). Cautions on the use of the SERVQUAL measure to assess the quality of information systems services. Decision Sciences, 1999(3).
Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Boston, Massachusetes: Harvard Business Press.
Vernadakis, N., Antoniou, P., Giannousi, M., Zetou, E., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2011). Comparing hybrid learning with traditional approaches on learning the microsoft office power point 2003 program in tertiary education. Computers and Education, 56, 188-199.
Villers, R. D. (2004). Usability evaluation of an e-learning tutorial: Criteria, questions and case study. Paper presented at the Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.
Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216-223.
Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36-59.
Wang, W. T., & Wang, C. C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers and Education, 53, 761-774.
Wang, Y. L., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 5600-5615.
Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing e-government systems success: A validation of the Delone and Mclean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717-733.
Wang, Y. S., Wang, H. Y., & Shee, D. Y. (2007). Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 1792-1809.
Warfield, J. N. (1976). Societal systems, planning, policy and complexity. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Weaver, D., Spratt, C., & Nair, C. S. (2008). Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality. Australasian Journal Educational Technology, 24(1), 30-41.
Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Review, 40(6), 1282-1309.
Weller, M. (2006). VLE 2.0 and future directions in learning environments. Paper presented at the The First International LAMS Conference, Sydney, Australia.
Wells, R. A. (1990). Computer-mediated communication for distance education and training: Literature review and international resources. Boise, Idaho: U. S. Army Research Institute.
Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, K. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E-learning: Emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245-258.
Wilkin, C., & Hewitt, B. (1999). Quality in a respecification of DeLone and McLean's IS success model. Paper presented at the Information Resources Management Association (IRMA) International Conference, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85-102.
Wrzesien, M., & Raya, M. A. (2010). Learning in serious virtual worlds: Evaluation of learning effectiveness and appeal to students in the e-junior project. Computers and Education, 55, 178-187.
Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers and Education, 55(155-164).
Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., Hsia, T. L., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Analysis of e-learning innovation and core capability using a hypercube model. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1851-1866.
Wu, W. W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828-835.
Zaiane, O. R. (2002). Buidling a recommender agent for e-learning systems. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE'02), Alberta University, Edmonton, Alta, Canada.