簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張維茹
Chang, Wei-Ju
論文名稱: 民眾參與都市更新整建之行為意願探討-以台南市為例
The Intention of Residents in Urban Renovation-A Case Study in Tainan City
指導教授: 鄒克萬
Tsou, Ko-Wan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系
Department of Urban Planning
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 93
中文關鍵詞: 民眾參與都市整建社會認知理論計畫行為理論
外文關鍵詞: Public Participation, Urban Renovation, Social Cognitive Theory, Theory of Planned Behavior
相關次數: 點閱:185下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 台灣都市在高度發展下面臨環境惡化、交通壅塞、環境品質低落等都市老化問題,為了有效解決台灣都市的機能衰敗問題,我國政府透過都市更做為減緩都式衰退的手段,近年來在民眾對於都市更新重建意願低落,都市住宅老化下,政府以「都市更新整建」為重點施政目標,近年來更積極透過容積獎勵、稅捐減免等措施鼓勵民間參與都市更新,希望透過民間資金和人力的投入加速都市環境的改善。因此,本研究將以計劃行為理論結合社會認知理論和科技接受模式為基礎分析民眾的都市更新整建參與行為,探討個人因素和社會因素對民眾參與都市更新整建意願的影響,從個體角度進行都市更新行為的解構,找出影響民眾都市更新意願的關鍵因素,建構民眾參與都市更新整建行為之意向模式。
    由實證結果可知,民眾參與都市更新整建之意願受到居住滿意度的影響外,亦受到同社區或鄰里住戶的影響,對於都市更新政策態度以及個人知覺都市整建的利益性和知覺執行能力之影響。此外,民眾對於都市整建的知覺利益性會受到相關知識和能力多寡的影響,故未來在推行都市更新整建政策上,應強調以社區或鄰里為單位進行都市更新事業之推行;此外,加強民眾對於都市更新相關政策知識、法令和辦理程序的瞭解,將有助於提升都市更新整建的民眾參與意願。

    The high deveplope in Taiwan's cities bring about the urban decay,include in Environmental degradation, traffic congestion,and the low living quality .In order to effectively address the issue of Taiwan urban decay function,our government through the city more as a means to slow the decline of all type.Because people's will low for urban renewal,, the government take the "urban enewal renovation" as a means to solve the problem with 'Housing aging'.In recent years,the goverment through the volume incentive, tax relief and other measures to encourage private participation in urban renewal.therefore,to achieve improvement of urban environment through private capital and human investment.
    Therefore, this study will combined with the social cognitive theory(SCT),the theory of planned behavior(TPB),and the technology acceptance model(TAM) to analysis the public participation in urban uenovation behavior .Analysis the personal factors and social factors on public participation in urban renovation Intentions,analysis the urban renewal behavior in an individual perspective to find out the the key reason in why people Participate the urban renewal,and construction the intention model of people involved in acts of urban renovation.
    The empirical results reveal that the residents’ desire for renovation work in urban renewal will be influenced by both residential satisfaction and neighborhood residents . and personal perception of the interests of urban renovation work and the impact of perceived ability to execute. In addition, the participation of the public in renovation work will be affected by the knowledge and the ability. As a result, the future urban renewal policy should beImplemented by the unit of community or neighborhood. What’s more, to enhance the participation in urban renewal Renovation ,the public should also be educated the knowledge of urban renewal policies, laws and procedures.

    第一章 緒論...............................................1 第一節 研究動機與目的.....................................1 第二節 研究範疇...........................................3 壹、研究對象............................................3 貳、研究範圍............................................3 参、研究內容............................................4 肆、研究方法............................................4 伍、研究流程............................................5 第二章 文獻回顧...........................................7 第一節 都市更新發展與轉變.................................7 壹、「整建維護」型都市更新..............................7 貳、我國都市更新發展的轉變與困境........................9 第二節  研究範疇........................................13 壹、社會認知理論(Social Cognitive Theory, SCT) ........13 貳、計畫行為理論(Theory of Planned Behavior,TPB).....17 參、科技接受模型(Technology Acceptance Model, TAM)...26 第三節 居住滿意度.......................................29 壹、滿意度定義與內涵...................................29 貳、居住環境品質定義...................................29 參、居住環境品質評估指標...............................30 第三章 研究設計..........................................32 第一節 研究架構.........................................32 第二節 研究操作假設.....................................38 壹、研究假設...........................................38 貳、研究假設路徑圖.....................................39 第三節 研究變項操作型定義與衡量.........................41 壹、居民基本屬性變數說明...............................41 貳、政策態度變數說明...................................41 參、知覺利益性變數說明.................................42 肆、知覺執行能力變數說明...............................43 伍、鄰居影響力變數說明.................................44 陸、居住不滿意度變數說明...............................44 柒、參與整建意願變數說明...............................45 第四節 問卷內容設計.....................................46 壹、居住滿意度.........................................47 貳、知覺執行能力.......................................48 參、鄰居影響力........................................48 肆、知覺利益性........................................49 伍、民眾參與整建意願..................................49 陸、都市更新整建相關政策態度..........................50 柒、受訪者基本資料...................0................51 第五節 資料蒐集方式....................................52 第六節 資料分析方法....................................53 壹、樣本結構分析......................................53 貳、敘述性統計........................................53 參、問卷信度與驗證性因素分析..........................53 肆、結構方程模式(SEM).................................57 第四章 實證結果與分析....................................62 第一節 樣本結構分析.....................................62 壹、受訪者個人資料分析................................63 貳、受訪者家戶資料分析................................64 第二節 敘述性分析.......................................66 壹、受訪者參與整建之態度分析..........................66 貳、受訪者參與整建之目的和需求分析....................67 第三節 問卷信度與因素分析...............................68 壹、問卷信度分析......................................68 貳、問卷驗證性因素分析................................68 第四節 民眾參與整建行為意願探討之結構模式...............71 壹、模式適配度檢定....................................71 貳、模式結果分析......................................74 第五章 研究結論與建議....................................80 第一節 研究結論.........................................80 壹、政策態度..........................................80 貳、知覺利益性........................................80 參、知覺執行能力......................................81 肆、鄰居影響力........................................82 伍、居住不滿意度......................................82 第二節 研究建議.........................................84 壹、政策建議..........................................84 貳、研究發展建議......................................84 參考文獻..................................................86 中文文獻.................................................86 英文文獻.................................................88 附錄 :研究問卷............................................91

    中文文獻
    王秦雪 (2009),環境污染區民眾參與之行為意向變遷-中石化安順廠址污染個案分析,東海大學碩士論文。
    吳明隆 (2007),"SPSS 統計應用學習實務--問卷分析與應用統計.",台北,知城。.
    呂宗盈、林建元 (2002),由制度面探討臺灣土地使用管理制度變遷之研究,建築與規劃學報,第3卷,第2期, 136-158頁。
    李宗旻 (2007),民眾自力更新策略之研究,國立台北科技大學碩士論文。
    李婉鈺 (2008),住宅社區自辦更新參與機制之研究,中國文化大學碩士論文。
    李鴻漢 (2004),以社區營造推動都市更新整建及維護機制之研究,中國文化大學碩士論文。
    沈德裕 (2003),消費者偏好、資訊媒體與政府住宅政策對購屋意向影響之研究-以台中縣市為例,朝陽科技大學碩士論文。
    林佑璘(2003),臺北市實施都市更新歷程及影響之研究,中國文化大學碩士論文。
    林明哲 (2008),探討民眾參與行為在城鄉風貌發展過程中的主要影響因素,國立高雄大學碩士論文。
    侯信安 (2007),臺北市萬華區居民居住環境品質滿意度之研究.,臺北市立教育大學碩士論文。
    柯佩如 (2004),都市計畫形成過程中民眾參與之研究:以臺北市南港區都市計畫主要計畫通盤檢討案為例,國立台北大學碩士論文。
    洪許真 (2003),民眾參與社區公共事務態度之研究,淡江大學碩士論文.
    張松源 (2005),台北市都市更新案執行問題與改善策略之研究,國立台灣科技大學碩士論文。
    張晏臺 (2009),民間辦理都市更新事業遭遇問題之研究-以台北市為例,中華大學碩士論文。
    梁基財 (2008),都市更新政策執行之研究—以台中縣為例,東海大學碩士論文。
    郭彰仁、侯錦雄、郭瑞坤、歐雙磐、謝政勳(2009) ,檢視社區居民參與城鄉風貌計畫的計畫行為理論,建築學報,第69卷 ,137-154頁。
    陳清江 (2002),眷村居民居住品質滿意度與對社區改建需求之研究-以高雄市明建新村為例. 國立中山大學碩士論文。
    曾國雄 (1992),台北都會區土地使用型態與環境品質之研究,都市與計劃,第十九卷,第一期。
    楊國昌 (2006),北投車站周邊地區都市再生之研究,中國文化大學碩士論文。
    楊敏芝 (2002),地方文化產業與地域活化互動模式研究-------以埔里酒文化產業為例,國立台北大學博士論文。
    詹彩鈺(2003),公共政策規劃之民眾參與行為影響因素之研究-以「台中酒廠舊址保存與整體再發展」為例,逢甲大學碩士論文。
    蕭銘雄、鄭曉平,(2008),以延伸式科技接受模型探討消費者線上投保人壽保險之意願,電子商務學報,第10卷,第3期 ,1-25頁。
    賴慧儀 (2000),都市原住民社區類型與環境品質滿意度之研究.,逢甲大學碩士論文。
    賴宗裕 (1998) ,民眾參與都市建設事務之意義與限制,人與地雜誌,第173期,21-31頁。
    賴奎魁、劉松癸 (2002). 居住環境品質概念性模式與其決定性因素之初探. 管理與系統,第9卷,第4期,489-512頁。
    蘇英瑋 (2000),民間參與都市更新災區重建-兼論容積獎勵之迷思,國立政治大學地研所碩士論文。


    英文文獻
    Ajzen, I. (1980). UNDERSTANDING EVENTS - AFFECT AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF SOCIAL-ACTION - HEISE,DR. Contemporary Psychology, 25(10), 775-776.
    Ajzen, I. (1986). DISPOSITIONAL PREDICTION OF BEHAVIOR IN PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGY. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 39, A65-A65.
    Ajzen, I. (1991). THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
    Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). PREDICTION OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOR - ATTITUDES, INTENTIONS, AND PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL-CONTROL. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453-474.
    Bandura, A. (1977). SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
    Bandura, A. (1997). The anatomy of stages of change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 8-10.
    Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). DIFFERENTIAL ENGAGEMENT OF SELF-REACTIVE INFLUENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38(1), 92-113.
    Barrero, F., Toral, S., Vargas, M., Cortes, F., & Manuel Milla, J. (2010). Internet in the development of future road-traffic control systems. Internet Research, 20(2), 154-168.
    Beaumont, J., & Loopmans, M. (2008). Towards radicalized communicative rationality: Resident involvement and urban democracy in Rotterdam and Antwerp. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 95-113.
    Bellush, J., & Hausknecht, M. (1966). ENTREPRENEURS AND URBAN RENEWAL. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 32(5), 289-299.
    Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1986). APPLICATIONS OF SELF-EFFICACY THEORY TO UNDERSTANDING CAREER CHOICE BEHAVIOR. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 279-289.
    Burby, R. J., Salvesen, D., & Creed, M. (2006). Encouraging residential rehabilitation with building codes: New Jersey's experience. [Article]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(2), 183-196.
    Camison-Zornoza, C., & Boronat-Navarro, M. (2010). Does regulation perform better than self-regulation? An analysis of Spanish environmental policies. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 28(4), 733-758.
    Chang, H.-S., & Yang, H.-M. (2010). Public acceptance of the Cyber Taipei initiative and cyber-government services. Habitat International, 34(2), 210-218.
    Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY - DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE AND INITIAL TEST. Mis Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
    Davis, F. D. (1989). PERCEIVED USEFULNESS, PERCEIVED EASE OF USE, AND USER ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Mis Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
    EGRUP. (2004). Assessing the impacts of spatial intervention: The 3Rs guidance. Interdepartmental Group on the EGRUP Review Office: London.
    Elliott, M. A., & Thomson, J. A. (2010). The social cognitive determinants of offending drivers' speeding behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(6), 1595-1605.
    Ercan, M. A. (2010). Searching for a Balance Between Community Needs and Conservation Policies in Historic Neighbourhoods of Istanbul. [Article]. European Planning Studies, 18(5), 833-859.
    Ercan, M. A. (2011). Challenges and conflicts in achieving sustainable communities in historic neighbourhoods of Istanbul. [Article]. Habitat International, 35(2), 295-306.
    Gullino, S. (2009). Urban regeneration and democratization of information access: CitiStat experience in Baltimore. [Article]. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(6), 2012-2019.
    Gunay, Z. (2010). Conservation versus Regeneration?: Case of European Capital of Culture 2010 Istanbul. [Article]. European Planning Studies, 18(8), 1173-1186.
    Heberlein, T. A., & Black, J. S. (1976). ATTITUDINAL SPECIFICITY AND PREDICTION OF BEHAVIOR IN A FIELD SETTING. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(4), 474-479.
    Kim, J. H., Lee, S., Chan, K. W. C., Lau, J., Tsang, A., & Griffiths, S. M. (2010). A population-based study on the prevalence and correlates of drinking and driving in Hong Kong. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(4), 994-1002.
    Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.
    Mugabi, J., & Kayaga, S. (2010). Attitudinal and socio-demographic effects on willingness to pay for water services and actual payment behaviour. Urban Water Journal, 7(5), 287-300.
    Oosterhof, L., Heuvelman, A., & Peters, O. (2009). Donation to disaster relief campaigns: Underlying social cognitive factors exposed. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), 148-157.
    Primmer, E., & Karppinen, H. (2010). Professional judgment in non-industrial private forestry: Forester attitudes and social norms influencing biodiversity conservation. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(2), 136-146.
    Roberts, A. F., & Roberts, M. N. (2002). A "Saint in the City": Sufi arts of urban Senegal. African Arts, 35(4), 52.
    Rozario, M., Lewis, I., & White, K. M. (2010). An examination of the factors that influence drivers' willingness to use hand-held mobile phones. Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 13(6), 365-376.
    Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I. (1985). INTENTION, PERCEIVED CONTROL, AND WEIGHT-LOSS - AN APPLICATION OF THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 843-851.
    Shin, H. B. (2010). Urban conservation and revalorisation of dilapidated historic quarters: The case of Nanluoguxiang in Beijing. [Article]. Cities, 27, S43-S54.
    Some, W., Hafidz, W., & Sauter, G. (2009). Renovation not relocation: the work of Paguyuban Warga Strenkali (PWS) in Indonesia. [Article]. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 463-475.
    Tapsuwan, S., Leviston, Z., & Tucker, D. (2011). Community values and attitudes towards land use on the Gnangara Groundwater System: A Sense of Place study in Perth, Western Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(1-2), 24-34.
    Thogersen, J., & Gronhoj, A. (2010). Electricity saving in households-A social cognitive approach. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7732-7743.
    Unlu, A. (2010). URBAN REGENERATION, RENEWAL OR REHABILITATION WHAT for and for WHOM ? [Article]. Open House International, 35(4), 51-57.
    Wallbaum, H., Krank, S., & Teloh, R. (2011). Prioritizing Sustainability Criteria in Urban Planning Processes: Methodology Application. [Article]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development-Asce, 137(1), 20-28.
    Wiener, R. L., Winick, B. J., Georges, L. S., & Castro, A. (2010). A testable theory of problem solving courts: Avoiding past empirical and legal failures. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(5-6), 417-427.
    Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
    Woodruff, R. B., Cadotte, E. R., & Jenkins, R. L. (1983). MODELING CONSUMER SATISFACTION PROCESSES USING EXPERIENCE-BASED NORMS. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(3), 286-304.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2012-09-01公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE