簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳永恩
Chen, Yong-En
論文名稱: 碳鋼感應硬化全歷程之多物理場耦合作用研究
Multiphysics Coupling throughout the Induction Hardening Process of Carbon Steel
指導教授: 李旺龍
Li, Wang-Long
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 材料科學及工程學系
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 216
中文關鍵詞: 感應硬化多物理場耦合麻田散鐵相變殘留應力淬裂風險模型建立
外文關鍵詞: Induction Hardening, Multiphysics Coupling, Martensitic Transformation, Residual Stress, Quench-Cracking Risk, Modeling
相關次數: 點閱:23下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 感應硬化以高頻交變磁場在鋼材表層產生渦電流與焦耳熱,經快速淬火後形成高硬度麻田散鐵層,兼顧表面耐磨性與心部韌性。加熱、停留與冷卻過程同時涉及電磁、熱傳、相變及力學行為;溫度梯度與相變體積變化可能使硬化層與心部之間的過渡區出現瞬態拉應力,進而提高淬裂傾向。本研究以 CK45 碳鋼圓棒為對象,建立電磁場、熱傳場、相變場與固體力學的連續耦合有限元素模型,使各階段的溫度、相分率、應力與塑性應變歷程得以延續。模型考慮溫度與相分率相依的材料性質、相變動力學、相變體積應變、相變誘發塑性,以及由表面溫度、水衝擊密度與高斯型空間分布決定的非線性噴霧冷卻邊界。網格收斂後,模型預測加熱結束時表面下 2 mm 處溫度為 841.3 °C,與文獻基準值 840 °C 相近;各應變分量的演變趨勢與轉折時序亦與參考研究一致。

    為評估過渡區在冷卻過程中的應力—強度關係,本研究追蹤麻田散鐵初生前緣(f_M = 0.1),並以最大主應力 σ1 與瞬態混相降伏強度 σy,mix 的比值定義相對指標 R(t)。基準模型的最終殘留應力呈現「表面壓縮—次表層拉伸—心部壓縮」分布,但 R(t) 的最高值出現在冷卻中期的移動前緣,而非最終拉應力最大處。參數分析顯示,3000–7000 A 使有效硬化層由 1.87 mm 增至 6.65 mm,R_max 對電流則呈非單調變化,於 6000 A 達 1.87;加熱時間由 2 s 延長至 6 s 時,R_max 由 1.31 降至 0.74;停留時間由 0.5 s 延長至 3 s 時,R_max 由 1.09 降至 0.95。水衝擊密度 V_s,max = 5–30 kg/(m²·s) 對約 1.86 mm 的硬化層及約 700 HV 的表面硬度影響很小,但使 R_max 由 0.95 增至約 1.1。上述指標中,加熱電流與加熱時間各組採逐時間步階峰值,停留時間與冷卻強度各組採三點移動平均,以濾除前緣快速推進時之單步尖峰。整體而言,硬化深度主要受加熱電流與加熱時間影響;延長停留時間及避免超過完成硬化所需的冷卻強度,可能有助於降低本模型計算的相對指標。由於本研究未直接模擬裂紋,上述數值僅供製程條件間的相對比較,仍需實驗驗證。

    A continuously coupled electromagnetic-thermal-metallurgical-mechanical finite element model of the induction hardening of CK45 carbon steel was established, covering heating, dwell, and spray quenching without resetting the process history. The model reproduces the reference temperature of about 840 °C at 2 mm depth and the reported strain evolution. A relative index R(t), defined as the ratio of the maximum principal stress to the instantaneous mixed-phase yield strength at the moving fM = 0.1 transformation front, is used to compare process conditions. Heating current and heating time mainly govern the case depth, whereas dwell time and spray intensity mainly govern the transient stress-to-strength response. The peak of R(t) occurs during cooling rather than in the final residual stress state. Verification against published temperature and strain data confirms the implementation before the parametric study. Heating current, heating time, dwell time, and spray-water flux are then varied one at a time, and an equal-case-depth comparison identifies combinations that keep the effective hardened depth while lowering the transient risk index.

    中文摘要 iii Extended Abstract iv 誌謝 xx 目錄 xxi 表目錄 xxvi 圖目錄 xxvii 符號表 xxxi 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 文獻回顧 2 1.2.1 感應硬化製程與相變化模型 3 1.2.2 感應加熱物理機制 4 1.2.3 噴霧淬火冷卻 5 1.2.4 殘留應力生成機制 7 1.2.5 淬裂預測準則與評估指標 8 1.2.6 文獻統整與本研究定位 11 第二章 理論背景與數學模型 15 2.1 多物理場模型架構與基本假設 15 2.2 感應加熱原理與效應 15 2.2.1 線圈交變電流與外加磁場產生 16 2.2.2 變動磁通與感應電動勢 16 2.2.3 渦電流生成機制 17 2.2.4 電磁集膚效應與電流分布 18 2.2.5 焦耳熱能量轉化與熱源描述 19 2.3 熱傳導模型 20 2.3.1 能量守恆與熱傳控制方程 20 2.3.2 噴霧冷卻熱傳係數模型 21 2.3.3 熱傳導物理特性與場間耦合角色 24 2.4 相變化模型 25 2.4.1 加熱與冷卻階段之相變機制 26 2.4.2 擴散型相變化 26 2.4.3 非擴散型相變 29 2.4.4 相分率加權材料性質 30 2.4.5 硬度計算模型 31 2.5 固體力學 32 2.5.1 應變分量 32 2.5.2 廣義虎克定律與本構關係 34 2.5.3 多物理場耦合方程式 35 第三章 數值方法 38 3.1 數值計算架構與模擬策略 38 3.1.1 多物理場耦合機制 39 3.1.2 模型假設與簡化 42 3.2 幾何模型與網格收斂性分析 43 3.2.1 二維軸對稱 44 3.2.2 模型幾何參數 44 3.2.3 網格收斂性分析 45 3.3 控制方程式與邊界條件 48 3.3.1 電磁場模型與邊界條件 49 3.3.2 熱傳模型與邊界條件 50 3.3.3 相變化模型與邊界條件 58 3.3.4 固體力學模型與邊界條件 60 3.4 材料參數設定 61 3.4.1 電磁參數設定 63 3.4.2 熱物性參數設定 67 3.4.3 固體力學參數設定 71 3.5 數值模型驗證 76 3.5.1 基準模型驗證參數設定 76 3.5.2 溫度場分布驗證 79 3.5.3 應變歷程驗證 80 第四章 結果與討論 83 4.1 物理場分析 83 4.1.1 溫度場演變 83 4.1.2 相分率演變 86 4.1.3 應力演變與反轉 92 4.1.4 基準模型小結與參數分析規劃 104 4.2 加熱參數之影響 106 4.2.1 電流強度之影響 107 4.2.2 加熱時間之影響 118 4.3 停留與冷卻條件之影響 128 4.3.1 停留時間之影響 129 4.3.2 冷卻強度之影響 138 4.4 固定有效硬化層深度之加熱參數組合比較與候選判定 147 4.4.1 等硬化深度參數設計 147 4.4.2 有效硬化層深度之比較 148 4.4.3 相對風險與候選參數判定 150 4.4.4 組合參數分析結論 151 4.5 本章小結 151 第五章 結論與未來展望 153 5.1 結論 153 5.2 未來展望 155 參考文獻 156 附錄A 主應力與降伏準則之數學推導 159 A.1 最大主應力之數學推導 159 A.2 von Mises 等效應力準則 167 A.3 Tresca 最大剪應力準則 168 附錄B 相分率混合律之推導與適用範圍 170 B.1 混合律之層級與適用範圍 170 B.2 密度:由質量守恆得到的體積平均 170 B.3 比熱容:質量加權與體積分率表示 171 B.4 熱傳導率:等溫度梯度近似 171 B.5 電導率:等電場近似 172 B.6 相對磁導率:等磁場強度近似 173 B.7 楊氏模數:等應變 Voigt 近似 174 B.8 降伏強度:工程混合律 174 B.9 蒲松比:平均橫向應變近似 175 B.10 熱膨脹係數:自由膨脹近似與限制 176

    [1]Ambrosano, M., Induction Hardening Simulation of Crankshaft, Master’s Thesis, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, 2025.

    [2]Areitioaurtena, M., Segurajauregi, U., Fisk, M., Cabello, M.J., Ukar, E., Numerical and Experimental Investigation on the Residual Stresses Generated by Scanning Induction Hardening, Procedia CIRP, 108, pp. 827–832, 2022.

    [3]ASTM International, ASTM E140-12b(2019)e1: Standard Hardness Conversion Tables for Metals Relationship Among Brinell Hardness, Vickers Hardness, Rockwell Hardness, Superficial Hardness, Knoop Hardness, Scleroscope Hardness, and Leeb Hardness, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2019.

    [4]Avrami, M., Kinetics of Phase Change. I General Theory, Journal of Chemical Physics, 7(12), pp. 1103–1112, 1939.

    [5]Behrem, Š., Hrnjica, B., Estimate of Heat Transfer Coefficient during Quenching Steel in Water, Transactions of FAMENA, 42(SI-1), pp. 61–73, 2018.

    [6]Catal-Isik, A.A., Sanchez, L.J., Pantawane, M., Bedekar, V., Galindo-Nava, E.I., A New Microcrack Characterisation Method for Quench Cracking in Induction-Hardened Steels, Metals, 15(12), Article 1303, 2025.

    [7]Choi, J., Lee, S., High-Frequency Heat Treatment of AISI 1045 Specimens and Current Calculations of the Induction Heating Coil Using Metal Phase Transformation Simulations, Metals, 10(11), Article 1484, 2020.

    [8]Geijselaers, H.J.M., Numerical Simulation of Stresses Due to Solid State Transformations: The Simulation of Laser Hardening, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, 2003.

    [9]Greenwood, G.W., Johnson, R.H., The Deformation of Metals under Small Stresses during Phase Transformations, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 283(1394), pp. 403–422, 1965.

    [10]Hashin, Z., Shtrikman, S., A Variational Approach to the Theory of the Effective Magnetic Permeability of Multiphase Materials, Journal of Applied Physics, 33(10), pp. 3125–3131, 1962.

    [11]Hill, R., The Elastic Behaviour of a Crystalline Aggregate, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A, 65(5), pp. 349–354, 1952.

    [12]Holmberg, J., Wendel, J., Stormvinter, A., Progressive Induction Hardening: Measurement and Alteration of Residual Stresses, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 33(15), pp. 7770–7780, 2024.

    [13]Hwang, S., Yi, S., Park, J., Hong, S., Multiphysics Analysis Process of Front-End Process for Induction Hardening of 3D Structures to Predict Structural Deformation, Applied Sciences, 15(5), Article 2410, 2025.

    [14]International Association of Classification Societies, UR M53: Calculations for I.C. Engine Crankshafts, IACS Unified Requirements, Rev. 6, pp. 55–56, 2025.

    [15]Ivanov, D., Markegård, L., Asperheim, J.I., Kristoffersen, H., Simulation of Stress and Strain for Induction-Hardening Applications, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 22(11), pp. 3258–3268, 2013.

    [16]Koistinen, D.P., Marburger, R.E., A General Equation Prescribing the Extent of the Austenite-Martensite Transformation in Pure Iron-Carbon Alloys and Plain Carbon Steels, Acta Metallurgica, 7(1), pp. 59–60, 1959.

    [17]Krauss, G., Tempering and Fracture Behavior of High Carbon Martensite, Final Report, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 1980.

    [18]Kuhn, H., Models for Fracture during Deformation Processing, ASM Handbook, Volume 22A: Fundamentals of Modeling for Metals Processing, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, pp. 346–361, 2009.

    [19]Lakhtin, Y., Engineering Physical Metallurgy, MIR Publishers, Moscow, pp. 158–183, 239–248, 1963.

    [20]Leblond, J.B., Devaux, J., A New Kinetic Model for Anisothermal Metallurgical Transformations in Steels Including Effect of Austenite Grain Size, Acta Metallurgica, 30(1), pp. 51–63, 1982.

    [21]Leidenfrost, J.G., On the Fixation of Water in Diverse Fire, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 9(11), pp. 1153–1166, 1966.

    [22]Leitner, M., Aigner, R., Dobberke, D., Local Fatigue Strength Assessment of Induction Hardened Components Based on Numerical Manufacturing Process Simulation, Procedia Engineering, 213, pp. 644–650, 2018.

    [23]Lemos, G.V.B., Hirsch, T.K., Rocha, A.S., Nunes, R.M., Residual Stress Analysis of Drive Shafts After Induction Hardening, Materials Research, 17(Suppl. 1), pp. 70–74, 2014.

    [24]Li, J., Xu, Y., Wang, H., Liu, Y., Xu, Y., A Novel Model for Transformation-Induced Plasticity and Its Performance in Predicting Residual Stress in Quenched AISI 4140 Steel Cylinders, Metals, 15(4), Article 450, 2025.

    [25]Liščić, B., Heat Transfer Control During Quenching, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 24(7–8), pp. 879–886, 2009.

    [26]Maynier, P., Dollet, J., Bastien, P., Prediction of Microstructure via Empirical Formulae Based on CCT Diagrams, in: Doane, D.V., Kirkaldy, J.S. (Eds.), Hardenability Concepts with Applications to Steel, AIME, New York, NY, pp. 518–545, 1978.

    [27]Montalvo-Urquizo, J., Schwenk, M., A Parallel Multi-Fidelity Optimization Approach in Induction Hardening, COMPEL, 39(1), pp. 133–146, 2019.

    [28]Nukiyama, S., The Maximum and Minimum Values of the Heat Q Transmitted from Metal to Boiling Water under Atmospheric Pressure, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 9(12), pp. 1419–1433, 1966.

    [29]Rice, J.R., Tracey, D.M., On the Ductile Enlargement of Voids in Triaxial Stress Fields, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 17(3), pp. 201–217, 1969.

    [30]Romanov, P., Jahedi, A., Carlestam, A., Moshfegh, B., Norman, V., Peng, R., Calmunger, M., Hardening of Cylindrical Bars with Water Impinging Jet Quenching Technique, Steel Research International, 95, Article 2300884, 2024.

    [31]Rudnev, V., Loveless, D., Cook, R., Handbook of Induction Heating, 2nd Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2017.

    [32]Schöning, H., Kadanik, M., Reich, M., Petersen, S., Kessler, O., Challenges of Numerical Simulation Models for Induction Surface Hardening of Large Bearing Rings, HTM Journal of Heat Treatment and Materials, 77(5), pp. 319–332, 2022.

    [33]Shi, X., Lv, C., Li, G., Wang, K., Chen, J., Tang, J., Study on Induction Hardening Performance of 34CrNi3MoA Steel Crankshaft, Frontiers in Materials, 10, Article 1240087, 2023.

    [34]Simpson, P.G., Induction Heating: Coil and System Design, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, pp. 1–15, 1960.

    [35]Simsir, C., Modeling and Simulation of Steel Heat Treatment—Prediction of Microstructure, Distortion, Residual Stresses, and Cracking, ASM Handbook, Volume 4B: Steel Heat Treating Technologies, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, pp. 410–412, 2014.

    [36]Sugianto, A., Narazaki, M., Kogawara, M., Shirayori, A., Failure Analysis and Prevention of Quench Crack of Eccentric Holed Disk by Experimental Study and Computer Simulation, Engineering Failure Analysis, 16(1), pp. 70–84, 2009.

    [37]Tebbal, M., Mzad, H., An Hydrodynamic Study of a Water Jet Dispersion Beneath Liquid Sprayers, Forschung im Ingenieurwesen, 68, pp. 126–132, 2004.

    [38]Tong, D., Gu, J., Totten, G.E., Numerical Investigation of Asynchronous Dual-Frequency Induction Hardening of Spur Gear, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 142, pp. 1–9, 2018.

    [39]Trzaska, J., Empirical Formulas for the Calculations of the Hardness of Steels Cooled From the Austenitizing Temperature, Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 61(3), pp. 1297–1302, 2016.

    [40]Turner, P.S., Thermal-Expansion Stresses in Reinforced Plastics, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 37(4), pp. 239–250, 1946.

    [41]Wendelstorf, J., Spitzer, K.-H., Wendelstorf, R., Spray Water Cooling Heat Transfer at High Temperatures and Liquid Mass Fluxes, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 51(19–20), pp. 4902–4910, 2008.

    [42]Zeng, B., Dolbow, J.E., A Complete Phase-Field Fracture Model for Brittle Materials Subjected to Thermal Shocks, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2602.09031, 2026.

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE