| 研究生: |
黃志彬 Huang, Chih-Pin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
銀行信評系統與Altman Bankruptcy Model信用狀況與羅吉斯迴歸模型的比較 The comparison between the Banking Rating System and Altman Bankruptcy Model and Logistic Regression Model |
| 指導教授: |
王明隆
Wang, Ming-Long |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所碩士在職專班 Graduate Institute of Finance (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度: | 105 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 51 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 羅吉斯迴歸 、財務危機預警模型 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Altman Bankruptcy Model, Logistic Regression Credit Rating Model |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:142 下載:7 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主要探討利用Altman破產模型(Altman Bankruptcy Model)原先所定義的變數以及羅吉斯信用評等迴歸模型(Logistic Regression Credit Rating Model)衡量最近十年台灣共323家上市櫃公司的危機預警情形,衡量危機發生的前一年及前兩年的預警能力。
由於近年國際社會經濟狀況持續不景氣,時常可見大型公司乃至政府財務違約事件層出不窮,公司借款成本持續低檔導致資金浮濫,控管違約機率已成銀行重要課題,銀行本身內部設計出一套信評模型,對各種不同產業多面向評估違約機率,期能減少呆帳發生的機率進而降低損失。
Altman模型可說是危機預警模型的始祖,國內外許多研究也根據此理論基礎加以創新及改進,本文除了以原模型驗證之外,再嘗試以羅吉斯回歸建立信評模型,另外加上一個自定義的變數設計出新模型,測試危機預警的能力,最後再與銀行內建信評模型進行對照,綜合考量下發現預警正確率仍以傳統Altman破產模型最佳。型一與型二誤差在增加變數下無法有效下降。
This research’s main discussion is using Altman Bankruptcy Model and Logistic Regression Credit Rating Model to measure 323 public offering company of crisis warning case in the last ten years in Taiwan, measuring finance crisis occurred before a years and two years of warning capacity .
Due to the economic recession in recent years worldwide , many large company and government default event occurred endlessly. Company borrowing cost stayed at low point led to funds floating. Controlling default chances has become the most important subject for banks.
Banks itself has an built in assessment model on various industry to assess default chances in different faces, hoping to reduce the chances of default and reduce loss at the same time, Altman Bankruptcy model is said to be the ancestor of crisis warning model. Many researches are based on this theory and did more innovation and improvement . Except the original model to Logistic Regression Credit Rating Model, with one or two defined variables by myself to test the warning chances, and then comparing them with the Bank Ratings Model. Finally considering under early warning correct rate, traditional Altman model was still the best. Type II and type I error in the variables that cannot be effectively decreased.
Altman, E. I. (1968). "Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy." The journal of finance 23(4): 589-609.
Beaver, W. H. (1966). "Financial ratios as predictors of failure." Journal of accounting research: Vol. 4 ,71-111.
Blum, M. (1974). "Failing company discriminant analysis." Journal of accounting research: 1-25.
Gentry, J. A., P. Newbold and D. T. Whitford (1987). "Funds flow components, financial ratios, and bankruptcy." Journal of business finance & accounting 14(4): 595-606.
Ohlson, J. A. (1980). "Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy." Journal of accounting research: 109-131.
Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). "Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models." Journal of Accounting research: 59-82.
王麗淑 (1994). 以財務比率建立銀行放款信用評估模式. 碩士論文, 國立交通大學.
林妙宜 (2001)公司信用風險之衡量Corporate credit risk measurement.碩士論文,E國立政治大學
陳明賢 (1986). 財務危機預測之計量分析研究. 碩士論文, 國立臺灣大學.
陳肇榮 (1983). 運用財務比率預測企業財務危機之實證研究. 博士論文, 國立政治大學.
黃瑞卿, 吳中書, 林金龍 and 蕭兆祥 (2012). "台灣企業財務危機因子的實證研究." 台灣金融財務季刊 13(4): 55-77.
駱琬瑜(2007). 應用財務指標與公司治理建立企業財務危機預警模型. 碩士論文,國立政治大學
張啟任(2012). 台灣股票公開發行未上市櫃公司財務危機預測之研究. 碩士論文,私立淡江大學
潘雅慧(2004),「新巴賽爾資本協定與我國因應之道」,中央銀行季刊第二
十六卷第二期