簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鄭㫾元
Jeong, Sangwon
論文名稱: The Impact of Information Technology on Firm's Size and Productivity in U.S.: A Study of Coordination Costs as Mediating Effect
The Impact of Information Technology on Firm's Size and Productivity in U.S.: A Study of Coordination Costs as Mediating Effect
指導教授: 陳正忠
Chen, Jeng-Chung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 國際經營管理研究所
Institute of International Management
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 75
外文關鍵詞: IT investment, Coordination costs, Firm productivity, Firm size, Competitive advantage, Labor substitution effect
相關次數: 點閱:117下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • There have been many changes in work place since 1975 by adopting IT (IT) in business. The business value of IT has been discussed for a number of years among scholars by using 1980s~1990s dataset. In this paper, the primary goal is to access hypotheses that IT affects firm size and productivity mediated by coordination costs. Previously, it was proved that IT has negative relationship with firm size and also IT has positive relationship with productivity. However, these organizational change studies which are including Firm size and Firm productivity are never touched by IT value-experts at the same time. Also, since this study use recent firm-level data on IT spending by 381 firms from 2011 to 2013, it is assumed the results could be different from previous researches. In present study, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) has been used for best fit model, and autocorrelation, multicollinearity, heteroskedasticity and simultaneity are tested to make corrections and have better quality of data. Moreover, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) is used for regression analysis. As a result, it has been found that adoption of IT makes firm size smaller. However, the result says that IT investment is not related with productivity. Moreover, this research firstly has shown that there is no evidence that coordination costs are appropriate as mediation in the relationship between IT spending and Firm size.

    ABSTRACT I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I TABLE OF CONTENTS III LIST OF TABLES VI LIST OF FIGURES VIII CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation. 1 1.2 Research Objectives and Contributions. 3 1.3 Research Procedure. 5 1.4 Paper Structure. 5 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 7 2.1 Theoretical Background. 7 2.1.1 Competitive Advantage. 7 2.1.2 Labor Substitution Effect. 9 2.2 Definitions of Relevant Research Variables. 10 2.2.1 Firm IT Spending. 10 2.2.2 Coordination Costs. 11 2.2.3 Firm Size. 13 2.2.4 Firm IT Productivity. 14 2.3 Development of Research Hypotheses. 16 2.3.1 The Direct Relationship between Firm IT Spending and Coordination Costs. 16 2.3.2 The Relationship between Coordination Costs and Firm Productivity. 17 2.3.3 The Relationship between Coordination Costs and Firm Size. 18 2.3.4 The Direct Relationship between Firm IT Spending and Firm Productivity. 20 2.3.5 The Direct Relationship between Firm IT Spending and Firm Size. 21 2.3.6 The Relationship between Firm IT Spending and Firm Productivity Is Mediated by Coordination Costs. 22 2.3.7 The Relationship between Firm IT Spending and Firm Size Is Mediated by Coordination Costs. 23 CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 25 3.1 Conceptual Model. 25 3.2 Construct Measurement and Definitions of Variables. 26 3.2.1 Equations of Firm Size. 27 3.2.2 Equations of Firm Productivity. 27 3.3 Summary of Hypotheses. 28 3.4 Data Collection. 28 3.5 Variables Descriptions. 32 3.5.1 Firm IT Spending. 32 3.5.2 Coordination Costs. 32 3.5.3 Firm Productivity. 32 3.5.4 Firm Size. 33 3.6 Control Variable. 33 3.7 Method of Analysis. 34 3.7.1 Model Fitness. 34 3.7.2 Ordinary Least Square. 35 CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 36 4.1 Data Collection. 36 4.2 Descriptive Statistics. 36 4.2 Model Fit. 38 4.2.1 Normality Test. 38 4.2.2 Linearity Test. 39 4.2.3 Autocorrelation. 39 4.2.4 Heteroscedasticity Test. 39 4.2.5 Multi-Colinearity Test. 40 4.3 Hypothesis Analysis. 41 4.3.1 Mediation Test 42 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 44 5.1 Research Conclusion. 44 5.2 Managerial Implication. 48 5.3 Theoretical Implication. 49 5.4 Limitations and Future Research. 50 REFERENCES 52 APPENDICES 58 Appendix 1: Data from Information Week and Compustat (USD) 58 Appendix 2: The result of data Analysis from Eviews 73 Appendix 3: The result of data Analysis from SPSS 74

    Attaran, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between information technology and business process reengineering. Information & Management, 41(5), 585-596.
    Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
    Barua, A., Kriebel, C. H., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1995). Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 6(1), 3-23.
    Barua, A., & Lee, B. (1997). The information technology productivity paradox revisited: A theoretical and empirical investigation in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 9(2), 145-166.
    Berndt, E. R. (1991). The practice of econometrics: Classic and contemporary. MA: Addison-Wesley Reading.
    Berndt, E. R., & Morrison, C. J. (1995). High-tech capital formation and economic performance in US manufacturing industries: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 9-43.
    Berndt, E. R., Morrison, C. J., & Rosenblum, L. S. (1992). High-tech capital formation and labor composition in US manufacturing industries: An exploratory analysis. MA: National Bureau of Economic Research: G. P. Office.
    Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. M. (2001). How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 434-445.
    Bonaccorsi, A. (1992). On the relationship between firm size and export intensity. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 605-635.
    Bruns Jr, W. J., & McFarlan, F. W. (1987). Information technology puts power in control systems. Harvard Business Review, 65(5), 89-94.
    Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 66-77.
    Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42(4), 541-558.
    Brynjolfsson, E., Malone, T. W., Gurbaxani, V., & Kambil, A. (1994). Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Science, 40(12), 1628-1644.
    Cheng, J. L. (1984). Organizational coordination, uncertainty, and performance: An integrative study. Human Relations, 37(10), 829-851.
    Cheong, J. H., & Park, M.-C. (2005). Mobile internet acceptance in Korea. Internet Research, 15(2), 125-140.
    Clark, K. B. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. USA: Harvard Business Press.
    Clemons, E. K. (1991). Evaluation of strategic investments in information technology. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 22-36.
    Clemons, E. K., Reddi, S. P., & Row, M. C. (1993). The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The" move to the middle" hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 9-35.
    Daft, R. L. (2009). Organization theory and design. OH: Thomson Higher Education.
    Dailey, R. C. (1980). A path analysis of R&D team coordination and performance. Decision Sciences, 11(2), 357-369.
    Dewan, S., Michael, S. C., & Min, C.-K. (1998). Firm characteristics and investments in information technology: Scale and scope effects. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 219-232.
    Dewan, S., & Min, C.-k. (1997). The substitution of information technology for other factors of production: A firm level analysis. Management Science, 43(12), 1660-1675.
    Dixon Wilcox, H., Chang, K.-C., & Grover, V. (2001). Valuation of mergers and acquisitions in the telecommunications industry: A study on diversification and firm size. Information & Management, 38(7), 459-471.
    Evans, D. S. (1987). The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 567-581.
    Fisher, F. M., & Temin, P. (1971). Returns-to-scale in research and development; what does the Schumpeterian hypothesis imply? Cambridge M.I.T.
    Foster, K. R. (1998). Software tools [Technology 1998 analysis and forecast]. Spectrum, IEEE, 35(1), 52-56.
    Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organization design: An information processing view. Organizational Effectiveness Center and School, 8(1), 2-64.
    Gordon, R. J. (1989). The postwar evolution of computer prices. MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge: G. P. Office.
    Gordon, R. J. (2002). Technology and economic performance in the American economy. MA: National Bureau of Economic Research: G. P. Office.
    Gorton, G., Kahl, M., & Rosen, R. J. (2009). Eat or be eaten: A theory of mergers and firm size. The Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1291-1344.
    Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics. NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
    Gurbaxani, V., & Whang, S. (1991). The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 59-73.
    Hall, B. H. (1988). The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the US manufacturing sector. MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge. Retrieved from.
    Hansen, D. R., & Mowen, M. M. (1990). Management accounting. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Company.
    Harris, S. E., & Katz, J. L. (1989). Predicting organizational performance using information technology managerial control ratios. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 1989. Vol. IV: Emerging Technologies and Applications Track, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on, Hawaii.
    Hitt, L. M. (1999). Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Information Systems Research, 10(2), 134-149.
    Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 121-142.
    Hu, Q., & Quan, J. (2005). Evaluating the impact of IT investments on productivity: A causal analysis at industry level. International Journal of Information Management, 25(1), 39-53.
    Im, K. S., Grover, V., & Teng, J. T. C. (2013). Do large firms become smaller by using information technology? Information System Research, 24(2), 470-491.
    Kim, H.-W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 567-582.
    Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. (1994). Payoffs from investment in information technology: Lessons from the Asia-Pacific region. World Development, 22(12), 1921-1931.
    Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1-47.
    Leavitt, H. J., & Whisler, T. L. (1958). Management in the 1980's. London: Routledge.
    Lehr, B., & Lichtenberg, F. (1999). Information technology and its impact on productivity: Firm-level evidence from government and private data sources, 1977-1993. The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Economique, 32(2), 335-362.
    Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418-438.
    Loveman, G. W. (1994). An assessment of the productivity impact of information technologies. ALLEN, Ts J. y SCOTT MORTON, M. S, 84-110.
    Lucas Jr, R. E. (1978). On the size distribution of business firms. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 508-523.
    Malone, T. W. (1987). Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Science, 33(10), 1317-1332.
    Malone, T. W., & Rockart, J. F. (1991). Computers, networks and the corporation. Scientific American, 265(3), 128-136.
    Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6), 484-497.
    Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26(6), 430-444.
    Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283-322.
    Milgrom, P. R., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs.
    Mitra, S., & Chaya, A. K. (1996). Analyzing cost-effectiveness of organizations: The impact of information technology spending. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 29-57.
    Mooney, J. G., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. L. (1996). A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. ACM SIGMIS Database, 27(2), 68-81.
    Nicolaou, A. I. (2004). Firm performance effects in relation to the implementation and use of enterprise resource planning systems. Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 79-105.
    Osterman, P. (1986). The impact of computers on the employment of clerks and managers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 39(2), 175-186.
    Panko, R. R. (1991). Is office productivity stagnant? MIS quarterly, 15(2), 191-203.
    Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2005). Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 747-776.
    Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review, Reprint Service.
    Prokopenko, J. (1987). Productivity management: A practical handbook. Geneva: International Labour Office.
    Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Patnayakuni, N. (1997). Technology investment and business performance. Communications of the ACM, 40(7), 89-97.
    Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 31(2), 350-371.
    Ravichandran, T., Han, S., & Hasan, I. (2009). Effects of institutional pressures on information technology investments: An empirical investigation. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 56(4), 677-691.
    Ravichandran, T., Liu, Y., Han, S., & Hasan, I. (2009). Diversification and firm performance: Exploring the moderating effects of information technology spending. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(4), 205-240.
    Rumelt, R. P. (1997). Resources, firms, and strategies: A reader in the resource-based perspective. London: Oxford University Press.
    Shin, N. (1997). The impact of information technology on coordination costs: Implications for firm productivity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference on Information systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
    Shin, N. (1999). Does information technology improve coordination? An empirical analysis. Logistics Information Management, 12(1/2), 138-144.
    Siegel, D. (1997). The impact of computers on manufacturing productivity growth: A multiple-indicators, multiple-causes approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(1), 68-78.
    Soh, C., & Markus, M. L. (1995). How IT creates business value: A process theory synthesis. Paper presented at the ICIS, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    Strassmann, P. A. (1990). The business value of computers: An executive's guide. Connecticut: Information Economics Press.
    Taylor, T. A. (2002). Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects. Management Science, 48(8), 992-1007.
    Triplett, J. E. (1999). The Solow productivity paradox: What do computers do to productivity? The Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(2), 309-334.
    Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423-444.
    Vinekar, V., & Teng, J. T. (2012). IT impact in information and physical product industries. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(1), 65-71.
    Williamson, O. E. (1981). The modern corporation: Origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature, 19(4), 1537-1568.
    Yu, G.-C., & Park, J.-S. (2006). The effect of downsizing on the financial performance and employee productivity of Korean firms. International Journal of Manpower, 27(3), 230-250.

    下載圖示 校內:2024-01-01公開
    校外:2024-01-01公開
    QR CODE